Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, December 03, 2007


When Good Deeds Aren’t Really All That Good

I came across a headline today about Brad Pitt wanting to build 150 new homes in New Orleans for people displaced by Katrina.  That news made me think of another home-building initiative that has been on my mind a lot lately.

Do any of you ever watch that show Extreme Home Makeover?  The one with the really obnoxious guy who surprises a family, sends them away for a week or so, and when they come back has a new house all ready to go for them?  I’ve wondered how much good those new homes actually do those people.

For instance, I saw one episode about a family of a dozen or so people living in what was essentially a shack outside of Fairbanks, Alaska.  During the course of the show the crew essentially built these people an entire new house.  Nay, a new mansion complete with something like 10 bedrooms, and a football field in the backyard (complete with artificial turf).  But my question is this: How can people who could previously afford to live in no more than a shack suddenly afford to live in a mansion?

The new home is going to have a big property tax bill, not to mention big utility bills as well.  So what happens when these people can’t afford the home any more?  You know it has to happen.  Will the television show continue to send them checks forever?

Who knows, but I think it illustrates a good point.  Simply giving people things, whether it be a new home or a new car or even some new government entitlement, rarely makes them better.  It may improve their situation a bit while whatever you’ve given them lasts, but the key to true success is self-sufficiency.  If these people can’t provide for themselves, no amount of help in the form of giving them things is going to change that.

So someone like Brad Pitt may think he’s doing the people of New Orleans a favor by building all these new homes, but what good are the really going to be to people who apparently haven’t managed to put themselves back on their feet almost two and a half years after the original hurricane.

If they haven’t helped themselves already, chances are they won’t help themselves after others have helped them either.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for DianneM

I don’t think they are hungry enough.

DianneM on December 3, 2007 at 11:51 pm

They’re still waiting for a handout.


If govt control of the economy were the way to go, the Soviet Union would be the richest, most powerful nation in the history of the world.

Thanks to Obama, America remains the only country where it is illegal to drill our own oil!

robert108 on December 4, 2007 at 12:57 am
Avatar for Kenny

Most gifts come with property tax. Both the feds and the state are willing to set up payment plans. And the producers set up the new family with a nice check to off set the costs.

Even if they can’t afford it, they sell the home and make off like bandits. The show is good for all.

Kenny on December 4, 2007 at 02:25 am

At least for the homes Brad Pitt is building, I doubt that the combined utilty bills + property tax is going to equal anywhere close to what they pay for rent.

Also New Orleans post Katrina is an unusual situation.

I’m not sure you can judge adequately the difficulty fo the situation for people who are in the lower income class if you haven’t been down there to see yourself.  Low income housing is something that is missing there right now, rented or otherwise.  I’ve been there twice in the last six months and I wouldn’t say that I understand it well enough to be passing judgement on whether a given individual is incapable of taking care of himself.

I’m just saying….

Carrick on December 4, 2007 at 06:22 am

Well I believe in the TEACH a man to fish theory…

On the other hand, there’s SO much money in this country evidently, people can try anything they want as far as I’m concerned, IF they use their OWN money!

The Alaskan football field could have built/repaired a lot of housing in N.O., but I’m not the traffic cop in this game.

God is…

golfmann on December 4, 2007 at 06:54 am

I can’t read Pitt’s mind but I think his motivation may be good (and I think he’s a clown so giving him credit doesn’t come easy). It’s just another of those things that hasn’t been thought through.

A point was made above about selling the house and making out like a bandit. Heh. Years ago John Mellencamp held a drawing to give away a “Little Pink House” and after much hullablloo it was awarded to a single mother, who promptly sold it, pocketed the money, and left.

I like the idea of Pitt building those houses but without controls - rigid controls - it will flop like a landed fish.


The future ain’t what it used to be…..

(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Pilgrim on December 4, 2007 at 07:52 am

It would be interesting to put all of you tough guys in the same position and see how well you do.

Walk a mile in their shoes before you judge them.

ews48 on December 4, 2007 at 08:45 am

As long as it’s private funds being used I say go for it.  They can live in those houses, rent them, sell them…if worse comes to worse they walk away having lost nothing but gained a place to live at least for awhile.  And the morale of the entire city likewise might be raised at least for awhile.  If these were tax dollars I’d say hold your horses and CAREFULLY consider how the law of unintended consequences might apply, but that’s not the case.

iAMbs on December 4, 2007 at 08:49 am

Walk a mile in their shoes before you judge them.

Interesting comment. How do you know some of us haven’t done just that?


The future ain’t what it used to be…..

(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Pilgrim on December 4, 2007 at 08:51 am
Proof
Proof
17234 comments
Send a private message

Walk a mile in their shoes before you judge them.

Yes! Walk a mile in their shoes! And when you’re finished, you’re a mile away from them…and you have their shoes!


Shrugging off the mindless, baseless attacks of Liberal hyenas and jackals since 2007

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

”(Proof) You’re, as we say in Hawaii, No Ka Oi!”

-unsolicited testimonial

Proof on December 4, 2007 at 08:57 am

All I have to compare this with is my experience after Katrina, and several other hurricanes. Drive from Pascagula across to St Bernard Parrish and see how people have rebuilt. Then go into NO proper and it is like stepping through the looking glass. Just no comparison.

As for Pitt’s idea, if there is no controlling authority it will quickly turn into a boondoggle.

ews, Pil lives across the lake from NO, Carrick has worked in the region after Katrina, and I spent a month and a half and $4000 of my own money helping family and friends in Mississippi. I think we have sufficient experience of the situation to look at people not helping themselves and point that small fact out.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on December 4, 2007 at 09:15 am

Here is the BBC article on Pitt’s house building plan, well the plan he is speaking for. The houses, if they would actually workout as designed, aren’t a bad idea. NO gets beuacoup sunshine, and catching rain water for use is something that used to be very common throughout the south. Hope it works.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on December 4, 2007 at 09:38 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.