What If The Sequester Passes, And Life Goes On?


At Reason, Peter Suderman wonders if the opponents of the sequester spending reductions are worried about the impact of those reductions, or that the reductions might not hurt that bad at all:

The display of spending-cut scare tactics offer a window in the worldview of those who seem to believe that government spending is the fuel on which the economy runs, and to undertake any kind of federal spending reduction at all is to start a journey to an apocalyptic hellscape. One can only imagine what they’d say about a package that, unlike the sequester, actually cut spending over the next decade, or even just held it flat at current levels.

If you want a clue as to what some sequester opponents fear the most, though, check out what health care lobbyist Emily Holubowich, who represents 3,000 nonprofits opposed to the sequester, told The Washington Post on Saturday: “The good news is, the world doesn’t end March 2. The bad news is, the world doesn’t end March 2,” she said. “The worst-case scenario for us is the sequester hits and nothing bad really happens. And Republicans say: See, that wasn’t so bad.”

That’s the real fear here: not that sequestration will result in terrible things happening, but that it won’t result in very much at all, that few will notice or be deeply upset by its effects, and that people will learn to live with a government that spends very slightly less than it was planning to over the next ten years (though still far more than it did for the vast majority of the last decade).

Obama and the Democrats have a lot invested in the idea that the government is the driver of the economy. They can’t afford to let Americans get the idea that their prosperity comes from somewhere other than government.

They can’t let Americans get the idea that maybe our government is too bloated, and could actually be quite a bit smaller without hurting anyone.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters.

Related posts

  • Onslaught1066

    What If The Sequester Passes, And Life Goes On?

    Remember Sandy Hook?

    Super storm Sandy wasn’t enough of a tragedy…

  • mikemc1970

    What If The Sequester Passes, And Life Goes On?

    The useful idiots opposing it would have egg on their faces that they would never have to worry about being exposed in the press because the main stream media wouldn’t cover it.

  • borborygmi

    What If The Sequester Passes, And Life Goes On? It will and It will.

  • awfulorv

    Could be coincidental with the sequester but, their are reports of snapping sounds being heard from the main cable at the South end of the Golden Gate bridge, more later.

  • http://nofreelunch.areavoices.com/ Kevin Flanagan

    This is Y2K hysteria all over again.

  • $8194357

    Democrats and the “Alinsky methods”….


    President Obama and MSNBC’s Al Sharpton share a common philosophical connection despite their different styles. Both are disciples of Saul Alinsky, the late community organizer whose book Rules for Radicals, has inspired many liberals to demonize and demagogue their opponents as a means of securing political advantage.

    So when Obama gave an interview yesterday on Al Sharpton’s radio show, the resulting exchange was revealing. Obama used his platform to paint a horrific picture of what America would look like after March 1 if sequestration spending cuts went into effect.
    “We could see mental-health services affected, head start slots taken away. . . . It’s going to have an effect on cutting back on things like meat inspections, or folks at our airports, which means that airport lines may be longer,” Obama said. “Whether or not we can move Republicans to do the right thing is something we’re still trying to gauge.”
    Why would Republicans want to go through with such draconian actions? Well, the president explained, it’s all about their wanting to do the bidding of the rich.
    “My sense is that their basic view is nothing is important enough to raise taxes on wealthy individuals or corporations,” he said. “And they would prefer to see these kinds of cuts that could slow down our recovery over closing tax loopholes, and that’s the thing that binds their party together at this point.”

  • http://flamemeister.com flamemeister

    Life will be exterminated. The Russian meteor was just a warning.

  • Yogibare

    An interesting Op-Ed piece in the Bis. Trib. today by Ross Douthat; seems we are now such a rich nation that we can afford to have half our working population “not working”. This has become a way of life for many of the people in the U.S. Not working, by choice. Is this the “new normal” ????

  • awfulorv

    Are the Republicans afraid to portray this sequester business for what it is, a huge guffaw? Have they no one to lead their members, the role “Jokin” Joe Biden performs so well for the Dems, in a good laugh?

  • awfulorv

    Meanwhile, the Solar Powered, Trayvon Martin Memorial Train, slated to depart from Kissimmee to Okeechobee at noon, has been delayed, due to overcast skies.

  • http://genelalor.com Gene Lalor

    Sequestration vs. Balogna Sandwiches

    Okay, let’s just say Joe Citizen brings home about $40,000 after
    federal, state, and local governments glom up to 50% of his salary and then he
    is hit with another, unanticipated take-home reduction of 2.3% ($920 per annum).

    Joe and Mrs. Citizen have to make some hard decisions on how and
    where to reduce expenditures.

    Do they tell the kids they have to go without dinner once in a while?
    Do they tell their 15 month old that she has to reduce her Pampers consumption
    by 2.3%? Do the Citizens skip the mortgage payment for March?

    Or, do they have a Progresso soup and balogna sandwich supper once a
    month, cancel Billy’s trumpet lessons and Jenny’s ballet classes, forget that
    movie and babysitter, and maybe Joe gets a part-time job at Burger

    Our Democrat leaders in Washington are on the verge of effectively
    choosing fewer dinners, fewer diapers, and risking our credit rating by
    not paying their bills by instituting a grand presidential idea,
    “sequestration,” a variation on the Citizens’ absurd options instead of doing
    what Mr. and Mrs. C. and most rational people would do–reduce unnecessary
    expenses, cut out some family frills, and tighten their collective

    Politicians are rarely the brightest bulbs, despite what they think
    of themselves.

    And Democrat pols certainly think they’re smart as hell–although they
    can’t come close to passing America’s budget, paying off a farthing of America’s
    humongous national debt, or convince Americans that politicians actually fulfill
    any purpose, aside from digging the country deeper and deeper into what could
    soon become a financial morass without a bottom.

    The late, great, (Democrat) humorist Will Rogers once brilliantly
    opined, “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging,” words of wisdom
    today’s Dems either can’t understand or elect to ignore since they have been
    digging and digging and digging America into one of the deepest economic holes
    in recorded history by spending and spending and spending monies we don’t even

    Their solution? Sequestration.

    The latest example of Democrat dearth of smarts is currently being
    exhibited by the guy George Will describes as the “Hysteric in Chief,” none
    other than President Barack Hussein Obama himself who is carrying on like Henny
    Penny/Chicken Licken/Chicken Little of folklore fame who believed “The sky is
    falling!” simply because he had been hit on his fowl head by a falling acorn.

    As far as I know, Obama hasn’t had a falling acorn boink his head
    since his acolytes at the radical ACORN were outed as his minions. However, our
    “scholar president” nevertheless acts much like the chicken-brained Henny Penny
    by threatening to cut essential services and our military when he repeatedly
    says Republicans must agree with him or the sky would virtually

    In an article on HumanEvents.com titled “Will: The Sequester Is a
    Manufactured Crisis,” the astute, conservative political observer George Will
    put Obama’s whole, farcical sequestration charade in perspective. . .

    (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=30298.)

  • two_amber_lamps

    “Much is being made about the possible impact of sequestration on government programs for the poor and middle class, food safety, and the defense of our nation. It is somewhat surprising, therefore, for the White House to be headlining a 100 city government spending tour, transporting representatives from multiple departments and various agencies around the country to promote federal largess. If Washington is truly cutting spending on missions many consider vital, how can we at the same time promise and promote more financial assistance, much less afford this mammoth 100 city cross country tour?”

    –Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK)


  • Snarkie

    The GOP platform (for this week at least):

  • awfulorv

    You just knew that somewhere down the line Obama would do something to emulate one of his heroes, Fidel Castro. With his, in your face, release of the Mexican criminals, he has done just that. Unlike Castro though, who relied on boats to rid his island of his scum, Senor Obama is assuming that his criminals will avail themselves of their expertise at carjacking, or otherwise purloining the required cars, and trucks, needed to transport themselves to, and over, our Southern border. And this, dear friends, is a prime example of the wasting of another mind, which could have been taught to reason, but wasn’t, as a result of your reluctance to contribute to the United Negro College Fund.

  • Rick Olson

    It sounds like the sequesters will have little if any direct impact upon the average American. Congress and the President knew these were coming. Congress voted for these across the board spending cuts and the president signed them into law. There may be longer lines at the airport when you go through the TSA security lines to get to your flight. If the lines do get longer, that’s when there might be some grumbling about the cuts. Get to the airport at least two hours before your flight is scheduled to depart and you’ll be just fine.