Excellent! Like Ann Coulter, I know when I’m making leftie heads explode, I’m doing it right; saying the truth. Truth to a leftie is like a Cross to a vampire.

robert108 on November 28, 2008 at 05:31 pm

Patting yourself on the back, I see!
Knock it off with the absurdity.

The purpose of real marriage has always been to resolve the male/female polarity, to unite families, and to legitimize children.

if you truly believe this then you honestly disgust me.

You keep lying, we keep smackin’ you with the truth.

being incorrect yet being willing to be open to other truths does not make one a liar. Making false truths along with stubborness does make one a “fabulist”. At least in my own eyes…

So,”that “tiny violent minority special interest group” is your future. get used to it friends…

Shit Happens
John Locke on November 28, 2008 at 07:36 pm” you openly, publicly admit your goal is an armed conflict in North America. Thanks for being honest, suckpuppet. At least one of your personalities should be.

Dino,

Others may have, but I did not say that you were Evil. Just because I disagree with you does not mean that you Evil. I merely challenged you to look at how our adversaries treat people before you decide that we are the bad guys. They didn’t start doing this because of us, they did it long before. We are just a convienient excuse.

You say “this EVIL COUNTRY.” So what makes this country so evil, and where would be a better place to live (no I’m not saying move there).

I have lived and visited many places. Few places have our quality of life. The US is a leader in foreign Aid (from agricultural projects in Africa to disaster relief in Asia). We have the best health care (in spite of the access issue). And, for over 230 years we have had a great string of civil transfers of power at the city, state, and federal level (including a peaceful transition from a confederacy under the Articles of Confederation to a federal republic under the Constitution).

like i said, there are no solid reasons besides the fact that a growing number of people around the world think it’s “the right thing to do”. eventually we’ll outnumber you in church and state, and that will be the end of this discussion.

So, if a solid number of people around the world approve of adult sex with minors, will that make it right? Never! My point being, morality is not subject to the ballot box or polls. Either a thing is immoral or it is not, and homosexuality is by any reasonable measure immoral.

How will it end the discussion, the people opposing it will still fight against it because it is perverse, it is perverted sexual relations and a perversion of marriage. By the way, to get the world behind you will require more than a Billion Muslims, a Billion Catholics and hundreds of millions of evangelical Christians to accept it, which means a zillion years from now maybe. Widely accepted in a fat, lazy and liberal western world? Yeah, maybe, but even that is still in doubt.

John LOcke was an idiot of the first order! A wholly self-involved creature, in love with himself and the sound of his own voice!

like i told you, this is easier said then done. the most basic arguement is that it is the right people who meet the requirements of marriage, even if they are of same sex, that they should be allowed to marry. And change is
needed to survive. just thought i ought to add that

Now you have descended into pure bullshit. The primary requirement for marriage, the one that defines it, is that it’s between men and women. Now, in most of the world, it’s one man one woman, but whatever the ration, “marriage” is the union of the male and female. Without that requirement, it’s meaningless, just another “hookup” for temporary pleasure purposes.
Your weak cheese about “change” is noted; again, what is the reason to change this? Please give a reason, if you can.
In what way does changing the basic requirement for marriage help anyone survive? Please give details, with premises and conclusion.

you cannot nullify anything! like i said, expo facto. i’m sure you do not have to look it up to know what that means. And my chronological order was incorrect only because i did not include that prior ruling. you are right on the fact that it was a State Supreme Court ruling that made the “right” of same sex marriage. My apologizes. But like i said, despite that, expo facto laws should protect them. Just because i was incorrect does not make me a “fabulist”. I am always open to corrections and discussion.

like i told you, this is easier said then done. the most basic arguement is that it is the right people who meet the requirements of marriage, even if they are of same sex, that they should be allowed to marry. And change is needed to survive. just thought i ought to add that

Brain dead for sure and certain.

But using the words like self-depracating and debauched is so totally gay.

And the phrase “come now” is over-the-top-I’m-wearing-an-ascot-and-smoking-jacket-and-can’t-stiffen-my-wrists gay.

Look, the problem is that if we try to leave, Iran will almost certainly over throw whatever meager defenses we have set up and absorb the weapons and such that we leave behind. and don’t bother saying that we don’t because we ALWAYS do. I don’t know why, ask our military. Probably because it’s cheaper to leave it there then ship it back to the US. So there in lies the problem. If we even try to mention a sentence with “longer” and “stay”, the speaker will be chastised horribly. But if we go, we are just arming our enemy. What to do what to do….

Locke

Robbie, I never see you posting any links or offering anything beyond bitter commentary.

Perhaps your intellect cannot compete.

More proof of insanity.

Dino once before you accussed the American soldiers of being terrorists and now you deny any terrorism on the part of aggressive gay activists, but let us look at the word:

Terrorism: It is by violence or threats of violence to cause fear in order to force others to accept your will on a particular matter.

Islam is terrorist in that its miltant adherents through actual acts of violence, rape, torture and murder and threatened acts desire cause fear among all Jews and infidels in order to force their religion and way of life on other people.

In Iraq we went in as a legitimate military force under the approval of the United Nations to bring down a murderous, extremely violent dictator. We have stayed long enough to help the Iraqi people build a safe and stable democracy, wherein the people decide their own destiny. Other than a very few, rare criminal acts, there have been absolutely no illegal or immoral acts committed by our military. It was all conducted under the rules of war for the security of the United States and the best interests of the Iraqi people and the Middle East. Our operations there by no stretch of the truth can be reasonably defined as terrorism.

Homosexuals have used the courts and taken to the streets by acts of actual violence, verbal violence and threats of violence to intimidate, to force, those objecting to their lifestyle choice into giving them their way, to validate their perverse sexual lifestyle choice.

The United States does not commit acts of terror, while in both Islam and the activist homosexual community terrorism is their modi operandorum; that is, their standard methods of operation to force others to give them their way.

Just watch, the history revision has already commenced. The media in Europe has been trying to spin this for 2 months, the US media is just ignoring it for the most part. A few”Daddy is not home for Thanksgiving” puff pieces and a passing mention of how America is bugging out of the cities in Iraq.

dino? are you telling us that the USS Abraham Lincoln did not accomplish its mission during deployment to the Middle East? Care to prove that?

Saddam was killing, torturing(actual torture, not interrogation) and disappearing Iraqis for decades before any sanctions. Besides, he got megabucks through the corrupt UN “oil for food” scam, and spent it all on palaces for himself, so he was directly responsible for Iraqi starvation. The bombs the terrorists set were set to kill Iraqi civilians on purpose. No sane person would try to justify that.

You seem to be under the delusion that we care what you think. All we do is smack you with the truth when you lie. You’re a chew toy.

ehh, lets save his sexuality for another discussion. i’m already part of the http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/mccarthyism_hollywood_liberals_blacklisting_people_who_supported_anti_gay_m/P100/
conversation.

John, leave them this board. The poor things have so little to celebrate, that 4% victory over 2% of the population in California is all they have. They got to keep the word “marriage”.

We got:

The White House
The Congress
Many state legislatures

And soon,

3 liberal Supreme Court justices.

there was no “voters has received the same overwhelming response from the electorate: NO.” if you payed attention to the votes, it was pretty god dam close.

Personally, I don’t believe there were that many mass graves and the ones that were real I have not heard why they were there. Lots of propaganda out there particularly from America and Britian. Say, have they ever found those drones capable of hitting London within 45 minutes? How about all those chemical weapons? And what about that vial of horrible toxic material {read “baby [powder”} that Colin Powell was swinging around tesitfying before Congress to freak out people like you? Oh yeah, Saddam shipped all that shit to Syria and we didn’t notice. We just have the most sophisticated surveillance in the world so that if a camel farts in Iraq we knew about it. But oh yeah, they shipped it underground. Do you see where this is going? You people always have an answer.

The propaganda machine was working overtime back then. Every time you hear the numbers they rise. Soon you’ll be hearing that Saddam killed 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of his own people!!!

You know what propaganda is, right? Isn’t that what McCain’s campaign was based on, cough cough, bill ayers, socialism, barak hussein obama, reverend wright?

I’m sure Saddam Hussein (OH MY GOD! He has the same last name as our new President’s middle!) wasn’t a sweet man but that doesn’t absolve us of our part in wrongdoing. I’ll bet the millions displaced and the tens of thousands dead would have preferred life as it was.

The funniest part of thise whole line of debate is a bunch of conservatives trying to convince anyone they invaded Iraq to help dark people- MUSLIMS!- on the other side of the world! I mean, you people HATE to help people in your own backyard! Why would we believe you care about downtrodden Iraqis?

Because you don’t.

We got:

The White House
The Congress
Many state legislatures

And soon,

3 liberal Supreme Court justices.

Dino on November 28, 2008 at 05:12 pm

We? Who is this we shit?

can we just stop with all the name calling? it’s pathetic!

Face it, you’re kind are dying off.

And not a minute too soon.

The violent agenda revealed. This is exactly the same kind of thinking that killed more than 100 million at the hands of the Marxists. Thanks for affirming my call of a “tiny violent minority pressure group”.

Did I forget to mention that States generally regulate the institution of marriage. States recognize marriages outside of religion primarily because the institution of marriage benefits society.

Families are generally better off, the children better behaved and not tax burdens on the rest of society, and are generally formed into better adults. A lot of our criminality is based on the post-1970′s single, welfare mom paradigm, with the guys turning into thugs and the girls Ho’s, often having babies while they themselves are just emerging into the double-digits in age.

(Yeah, so Dan Quail was right after all, at least with respect to Murphy Brown)

States are also responsible for the Health, Safety, Morals and Welfare of their citizens.

Homosexuals have been and remain the leading vector of the deadly, incurable AIDS/HIV virus. What they do DOES affect the rest of society. Through their filthy anal antics they are coming down with a modern-day plague and handing the rest of society the price tag for curing them, and keeping them alive artificially through expensive drug cocktails.

Not satisfied with the substantial and added cost to society, they are also diverting much-needed research dollars from Breast Cancer, Cerebral Palsy, and many other vital research efforts.

Finally, there is the clear and present and very lethal danger they present to society by way of spreading infections to the non-homosexual aspects of society, thus the blood supply and organ donation supply is threatened, as well as the spread of their virus to the general population.

So, the oxymoronic Gay Marriage thing is bad for the rest of society.

Homosexuals should be able to marry and have the same rights and benefits that a man and a women who marry have.

Why? I have yet to hear a positive argument for changing the definition of what is the prime building block of human society to please a very tiny, violent minority pressure group. What do we gain from this?

Heh,

Debauched
insipid
nihilistic the
obnoxious troll,

Can’t cope with mockery. Whiny bitch indeed.

goon,

I second the motion and call for the vote.

Nope.

Debauched
insipid
nihilistic the
obnoxious troll,

Is indeed a winy bitch and “…a pathetic old homosexual.*”

* Same source as before!

Hey Nieman,

Not a problem, my friend. It’s interesting that you should say that. Back during the Clinton administration, my focus was Second Amendment. I posted in something like 40 state and Canadian RKBA Lists. I provided ammo to my friends there as well.

During an international conference someone recognized my Username nametag. He shook my hand and thanked me.

He said he had made a subdirectory specifically for my posts.

Cool.

overcompensating elinas,

I make no comment whatsoever about the content of robert108′s commentary. I was referring only to you and your posting history here on Say Anything Blod when I said:

Were you to follow your own advice:
You’d never again open your mouth or touch a keyboard.

Truth only hurts when it’s supposed to…

the person impersonating John Locke gets fast and loose with his starting point:

It was ruled legal here in California. Then it was over-ruled by the measure during our last election.

Get your chronology strait.

First, a ballot measure (Proposition 22) was qualified for the ballot in 2000 and passed. This proposition (which carried by 61.4%) amended state code to read:

Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.

As previously mentioned, this had no impact on California’s then existing generous Domestic Partnership laws.

That was a rather stunning repudiation for the likes of

Debauched
insipid
nihilistic the
obnoxious troll

and the rest of the “…pathetic old homosexual” whiny bitch fellow travellers. Rather than work the long strategy of convincing the electorate to reconsider, they took their challenges to the courts.

Noting this change in tactics by the “…pathetic old homosexual” whiny bitch crowd, and knowing the California Supreme Court for the bench sitting legislators they long to be, a new voter initiative, which would amend the California State Constitution to define marriage as a union between “one man and one woman” was qualified for the 2008 ballot (after legal maneuvering prevented it from being considered in 2007 when it actually qualified).

It was during this artificial delay that the California Supreme Court invented a “right” to same sex marriage which prior to that time had been invisible (non extant, in fact) in the letter of the actual state constitution. They did so despite petitions to stay their ruling until the voice of the electorate could be heard on the matter.

Proposition 8 of course passed.

In light of the history above, all of the same sex marriages entered into between the Supreme Court’s intercession and the electorate’s repudiation of that intercession should be nullified. Any California Supreme Court Justice who votes to overturn the amendment passed by the electorate should be recalled.

Do try to be less of a fabulist and whiny bitch,

Debauched
insipid
nihilistic the
obnoxious troll

has that niche more than adequately covered.

the person impersonating John Locke opines:

there is no point with you people is there?

If all you are going to bring is whiny bitching, no, not really.

2hotel9 I think you will be waiting a long time for dinomoron to give you proof…

and if you really believe that i’m someone else on here then go right on and think that. I personally don’t really care.

i just hope that in the future we breed out idiots.

Homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end; they have to recruit to increase their ranks, or even to replenish those lost to their AIDS plague. Their terrorism in trying to overturn the will of the people in CA is obvious.

RG: It’s use of “brainstem” as an adolescent insult is also grossly inaccurate. The brain stem is the source for the unconscious, vegetative functions of the body. A person with only brain stem activity would be an unconscious vegetable, incapable of either motion or awareness, much less able to type comments on a keyboard. Instead, the idiot exhibits perfect limbic system activity, appearing rational, but being subject only to preprogrammed responses, and inaccessible to outside information, operating only on the reactive, emotional level, convinced its worldview is the only way to survive, so it clings to its preprogrammed bullshit with the tenacity of someone who feels their life is at risk. It is beneath the level of any measurable intelligence.

Still waiting for you to prove anything you say, dino.

John Locke,

Using the arguement “It’s the right thing to do” is never going to win any arguement or debate with anyone over the age of 12. You could say, hey, let’s all kill those people making too much noise outside, “It’s the right thing to do.” See how dumb that sounds? That’s not a good arguement. As for gay “marriage,” no, I don’t get it. I have several gay friends and acquaintances, some of them are in domestic partnerships, a couple have had civil unions. They think this is so silly, and unneccessary. How come all gays aren’t pushing for it if it is so vital to their lives? It may be the shape of the future, but that doesn’t mean it is correct. My 17 yr. old pregnant daughter had to have me there to sign with her to get married, her fiance had to have his parent sign for him, and they had to have a proof of pregnancy that was signed by the state health dept. that was less than 2 wks. old to get married and it is legal to marry in GA at 17. It isn’t easy for heterosexuals to get married sometimes, either. But we didn’t get violent about it.

then why marry…?

Answered multiple times already. Do you have any affirmative argument for calling what homos do “marriage”? Still waiting.

If ones grits are kissable, why not plant a wet one

I think ALL women should be put on a pedistal…just high enough so that I can see up their dress!
/Lord, I “pologize……
.
.
.
.
//See?! Now I did it!

like i said, there are no solid reasons besides the fact that a growing number of people around the world think it’s “the right thing to do”. eventually we’ll outnumber you in church and state, and that will be the end of this discussion.

It’s use of “brainstem” as an adolescent insult is also grossly inaccurate.

But it’s like any other catch phrase. It get’s overused.
Kinda like Flo used “Kiss my grits”.
Pretty soon, everyone wanted their grits kissed.
THE more immature the person, the more they over use the latest catch phrase.
Just listen to any elementary-aged group of kids.

i was actually quoting something that robert said. In honesty, i don’t see most pro gay groups to be violent.

you cannot compare two people of the same sex getting married to that of a marriage between family, human and animal, or any of those listed above! like i said, change is needed to survive. whether any of you like or not, change is going to come to America eventually. I respect all of your opinions but that fact remains. so get used to it folks.

2HOTEL9,

Did you say something? Wasn’t paying attention. I was listening to President Obama’s last press conference. You remember him, black guy? Won the election? Liberal?

LOL

The US is 19th for per capita foreign aid. We’re not leaders.

Our adversaries didn’t kill over 30,000 Iraqi civilians. We did.

Many places have our quality of life. And better.

A convenient excuse? We invade a country and wreck total havoc and that’s your take on it?

Like I said, we crumbled because of one day’s attack, the loss of two buildings and 3000 people. Pretty harsh and cavalier to dismiss what we’ve done over ther for 6 years as easily as you do. But then, you can because you’re an American.

Oh, and really rebtex, gays committing terror acts? Aren’t we using the term a little lossely, ya drama queen? Gays stop shopping at a Prop 8 supporter’s store and that’s terrorism?

GIve it a rest.

Oh, and dinothefakehomo, your “activists” are committing acts of terrorism. They are physically assaulting people, vandalizing private and public property, and making multiple threats of violence against people who are not even involved in the issue. That is terrorism.

Contrary to your bullshit, this “change” is not necessary in any way, and you have repeatedly failed to furnish even one argument to the contrary. Two people of the same sex cannot be married, no matter how many lies you tell. What homos do isn’t marriage. The people have voted against this abomination every time they have been given the opportunity.

I do not care to change the minds of a depleting number of right winged wackos…

Once we outnumber you and change things, you can still oppose us. But you’ll look increasingly like the old southern cracker sitting in the rocking chair on the front porch complaining about “the nigras”.

Don’t believe me? Look at how your victories are of a lesser and lesser percentage. Face it, you’re kind are dying off.

And not a minute too soon.

if you truly believe this then you honestly disgust me.

Excellent! Like Ann Coulter, I know when I’m making leftie heads explode, I’m doing it right; saying the truth. Truth to a leftie is like a Cross to a vampire.

the person impersonating John Locke asks:

Isn’t John Locke dead?

Dino barely audible: Declare victory? Again? Perhaps on that aircraft carrier?

I’m sure all those children your troops killed, all those families destroyed, generations lost, are so glad you invaded their country. That’s like saying America shouldbe grateful for 9/11 because it rid them of 3000 greedy republican bond traders and demolished those ugly 70s-era office towers.

Conservatives are similar to Islamic terrorists in one, fundamental way: they both celebrate war crimes.

I think the people who supported this war should be forced to pay for it with any and all wealth they have as well as their SS and Medicare money

You really need medication because a sane person would put out such drivel. Also, what you said is vile disgusting and down right nasty. It put the crap written on the Daily Kooks to shame.

I dare you to say that crap to one of our soldiers. In fact as a veteran I find your rhetoric to be disgusting as well.

I was thinking so as well.

Nieman, when I see gay people dropping bombs on churches we can talk about comparing them to American troops in Iraq.

Maybe post some links to this “rein of terror” being carried out by the homos. Try to stay away from sources like NewsMax or World Net Daily.

You know, the more you people use the word “terrorist” to describe anyone you don’t agree with, the more dilutedand meaningless the word becomes.

but using the same logic, you can’t just say that letting them get married would case anyone harm! if anything, i think that it would add some extra revenue for some buisnesses. It’s true that it would only benefit a small majority, but it would most likely hurt an even smaller majority then that, if that! And as for an arguement for gay marriage. The only one truly available is that it’s the right thing to do. at least in the mind of those who are for it.

good idea.

End of discussion, civil unions are legal and legally binding. Period. You don’t like that? There are aircraft, ships, and trains leaving this hate filled, evil country every hour. Put your anti-American, anti-human asses on one of those forms of transport and let your anti-human, anti-America shadows darken our doorstep no more. Goodthefuckbye.

Wow, y’all got dinothefakehomo all in a dither, got it stealing from a womens college webpage. Way to be classy.

Long story short, dinothefakehomo supports terrorists and terrorism because it wants to do the same in America, hence its divisive and hate filled attacks on people commenting on blogs it deems as “conservative”.

The real members of the Gay activist community see dinothefakehomo as the problem. It and its fellow travelers are driving Americans away from the Gay community and its agenda. Each time dinothefakehomo and its buttbuddies attack old women at churches and vandalize homes and businesses and destroy property they are pushing people away from supporting special rights for gays.

Which is exactly what dinothefakehomo and other anti-Gay/Anarchist scumbags want. Balkanization. The “3rd Worlding” of America.

John? You really should be more discriminating in who you take sides with, that knife in dinothefakehomo’s hand can be sunk into your back as easily as it sinks into the backs of Gay Rights activists.

Craig thank you for your service.

Combat operations end in six months.

We’ve won this war despite people like you.

Good call Rob, these lefties tried to surrender and yet the american will came out and we won the war.

Oh my god! Gay terrorists are on the loose, attacking people! They hold them down and redo their hair! Then they break into homes and redecorate!

Yeah, you’ll get about as far with the myth of the homo-terrorists as you will with the Fannie & Freddie brought down the economy. LOL

Win for Bush and the USA.
I think we should declare victory.

Wait for it! Next it will tell us it is actually a lesbian.

Robbie, I never see you posting any links or offering anything beyond bitter commentary.

I tell the truth; you lie. If you think Iraq was just fine under the murderous, dictatorial reign of Saddam, you are simply insane. After you made that statement, you lost all credibility.

It was ruled legal here in California. Then it was over-ruled by the measure during our last election.and i am not speaking for other states. i am speaking about California.

Actually that is a lie!

Historically homosexual marriage was never legal in California! Then, because liberals were making moves in that direction, California voters said it will never become legal in this state. Then a few people in black robes overturned both the historical and expressed will of the people saying it should not be made legal here. Then the people asserted their authority and said “no dammit,” we’ll make sure and make homosexual marriage remains illegal under our Constitution. So, three to zero we the people of California have said no to homosexual marriage. It has never been legal here – NEVER!

Those homosexuals having been married here are in legal limbo, but I dare say the State Supreme Court may try and say their marriages are legal because of their former decision and if they do, then it would be hard to deny others the same privilege. In my opinion, at best the Court should say their marriages are not marriages at all and revert all of them to Civil Union status!

Dino: I feel so sorry for you that you have such a twisted view of history and the world. Bush was not great in many ways, but in leading the war on terror he has been an exceptional President. I noticed you failed to condemn Muslim terrorists, who were responsible for the vast majority of civilian lives in Iraq.

that “tiny violent minority special interest group” is your future. get used to it friends…

I guess if a tiny violent minority group wanted to kill all the homos, that would be OK with you, then? We already vastly outnumber you, which is why you always lose on this issue at the ballot box. No matter how many young boys are recruited by homo priests, you will never outnumber us. This is why you are so desperately trying to force your agenda on us through the courts.
I’m still waiting for an affirmative argument. What’s our incentive to grant you anything? The more you act out, the tougher it’s going to get for you.

the union of two people of the same sex is not singularaly based on “pleasure”. same can be said for any marriage. The point of any marriage is a way to show ones love for another. hopefully you can agree with that. If one man loves another man, or one women loves another women, then why cannot they show their love by getting married? Changing what you consider the “requirement” for marriage is necessary because eventually more and more people will support gay marriage. eventually it will become legal across the US. Look, can we just agree to disagree. I’m certain that i won’t convince any of you to be pro gay marriage, and you will certainly not change my opinion on this topic.

sometimes whether the people California wanted it or not, the judges said there part

The judges defied historical precedent the the expressed will of the people at the ballot box; that is, a kryptocracy, rule by the judiciary and is itself unConstitutional.

however [I] believe that homosexuals should have the same right to a marriage as any other person in this country. It’s going to happen eventually.

(1) Marriage is not a right, it is a privilege granted only to qualified people and homosexuals are not qualified.
(2) Marriage is a sacrament of the Church and it is UnConstitutional for the government to force their will on the church. Look it up, it is in the First Amendment!
(3) Even if it does happen eventually that does not make it right. Eventually adult sex with minor children might become socially acceptable and legal, but nothing on God’s earth will ever make that right. With homosexuality, it is a perversion of Natural Design and Divine Law, and so whether of a secular or religious mindset it is unnatural and nothing will ever make it right.

giving homosexuals the ability to marry wouldn’t hurt anyone, would it?

In those countries allowing homosexual marriage, even heterosexual marriage has declined and that is a conerstone of civilization and we cannot remove it without destroying civilization. Just ask the Roman and Greek Empires among many, that fell from power at the same time sexual liberality and homosexuality became accepted and commonplace. This is to say nothing of a long list of reasons why homosexuality and homosexual marriage hurt everyone, even homosexuals.

Let’s not lose sight of the fact that our government
misled US into the Iraq mess.

An outright lie that has been refuted countless times. Educate yourself.

Cannot is a statement as to ability.

I don’t suggest you bet your life on that one.

If you feel that being called a fabulist for conveniently omitting significant portions of the legislative history is unsporting, I suggest you make greater efforts with regard to factual accuracy.

Way more pathetic than Robert Preston’s “Toddy” and definitely without the self deprecating humor is our

Debauched
insipid
nihilistic
obnoxious

troll (and those are its positive traits!).

Another Dick In Nether Orifice intelligent comment.

What about the Gay priests raping alter boys under the guise of helping them be holier.

The Gays have taken over parts of our culture with their agenda, and are looking for all of society to look the other way.

Not here.

Not on my watch.

Get lost you fag.

i just hope that in the future we breed out idiots. atleast for the most part. we still need workers to make our burgers and such in McDonalds.

Kinda like Flo used “Kiss my grits”.
Pretty soon, everyone wanted their grits kissed.

RebTex on November 29, 2008 at 01:36 pm

If ones grits are kissable, why not plant a wet one?

Gay Dino:

After voters in Florida, Arizona and California joined residents of 27 other states with constitutional protections for traditional marriage — and homosexual activists responded with terroristic threats against Christians and their churches.

“Burn their f—ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers,” wrote “World O Jeff” on the JoeMyGod blogspot after California officials declared Proposition 8 had been approved by a margin of 52 percent to 48 percent. Confirmation on voter approval of amendments in Florida and Arizona came earlier. The amendments in all three states essentially limit marriage to one man and one woman. In California, the measure states the only marriages “valid and recognized” in the state are those between one man and one woman.

On a blog website, “Tread” wrote, “I hope the No on 8 people have a long list and long knives.

We also bombed Churches in Europe during WW-I and WW-II, it is called collateral damage and in virtually all cases the enemy was using churches or Mosques to hide in and use as a sanctuary to hide weapons and attack our troops. In virtually every case bombings were delayed time and time again at the costs of lives of our soldiers out of respect for the people and their religious faith, but permitted only to defend American and/or allied lives and these decisions, with much resistance and reluctance were approved.

You have an upside down, twisted view or reality!

Dino, do you still think that wise? aren’t we stretching ourselves a little thin as it is. i’m more worried about a direct attack on our nation right now to be honest with you. We may have to be thinking a bit more close to home sooner then later.

Oh yeah, you were responding to me despite your
not caring what I post.

I guess you can’t read, either, idiot. I said we don’t care what you think. When you post your lies, we smack you with the truth.

So, now our resident gayrights advocate is saying that being gay/homo is a bad thing.

It’s only bad if you’re a conservative gay person. Can’t have the gays wondering off the liberal plantation.