We Are Becoming A Nation Of Supplicants, Not Citizens

We are in a new era of American politics. One in which the government is taking more and more power over the economy and our lives. We have the Obama administration taking over car companies and closing down dealerships. Obama is taking over finance companies. The federal government is regulating everything from what kind of cars we can drive to what kind of light bulbs we can use. The “stimulus” spending spree passed into law by Obama and his fellow Democrats gives the federal government the power to not only accumulate our medical records into one central database, but to also weigh in when some bureaucrat feels our treatment isn’t efficient enough.
And even as we speak, Obama and his fellow liberals on both sides of the political aisle are pushing through legislation for taxes on carbon emissions (something we emit when we breathe) and nationalized health care (so the government will control the medical care we receive). The FCC is considering creating local boards that would dictate the sort of programming you can and can’t get on broadcast television and radio. The federal government is granting itself regulatory control over privately-owned land for no other reason than the land might be used in some sort of economic development our tourism project.
What all this is doing is turning us from a nation of citizens into a nation of supplicants.
I read news stories about people contacting politicians for help with their loans. I read news stories about politicians intervening to keep the government from closing down businesses in their states or districts.
Would it really be so hard to believe that should nationalized health care and cap-and-trade carbon taxes be put into place, Americans will be lining up in front of their politicians begging for help with getting medical attention or permission to emit more carbon than the government normally allows? Is that an America you would want to live in?
What is going on now reminds me of how monarchs throughout history would set aside special days where their subjects could come and ask them to grant favors, everything from requests for “the Divine Touch” to cure diseases to requests for patronage or mediation in land disputes. The supplicants would be led in one by one, and the monarch would rule on their cases.
Granted, our political leaders today are granted their power through election and not some sort of divine right, but we’re still creating a situation where government is so all-powerful that citizens are not empowered to set their own destinies. Instead they, more and more, must line up to supplicate the political class for permission, subsidy and succor.
We Americans like to talk about how America is a “free country.” Yet more and more it is not a free country. It is a country where your freedom to do (or not do) any given thing – be it driving a certain kind of car to emitting carbon – hinges almost entirely upon the rulings of the political elite.
Which is just the way the political elite like it. Better you must come to them for help and aid – for which they can extract a price from you – than for you to be able to help yourself.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • ellinas

    We Are Becoming A Nation Of Supplicants, Not Citizens
    By Rob on June 7, 2009 at 11:47 am

    Shocker: Fear Of Being Fired Boosts Productivity

    "She estimates she's put in hundreds of hours of unpaid overtime work."

    By Rob on June 7, 2009 at 10:09 am

    We are becoming a nation of slaves!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    She could quit her job if she wanted to, Ellinas. At-will employment is not the same as slavery.

  • docdave

    With Obama and his government in control of everything the choices will be to revolt or grovel at his feet.

  • dirl126

    Interesting post, Rob. I was wondering when someone was going to express the perspective of worried Republicans. Your post sounds like it was from a candide farmer in about the 1770's

    I just hope that the democratic ruling is another pendulum swing, and that some day it will swing back into our favor.
    Thus, I greatly fear the instituionalization of nationalized health care and other irreversible policies.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    you are true Rob….America no longer MAKES anything. We are a "service" economy. This is a truth that condemns US to 3rd world status.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    "If ye love wealth better than liberty,
    the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace.

    We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.

    May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!"
    Samuel Adams

    Some of us will not become supplicants, nor appeasers, nor pacifists!

    Whatever the cost in personal treasure or blood, we will resist, interfere, and undermine these actions within legal means as well we are able.

    Nor will we forget those who brought us to this point. The price may be high for the likes of ourselves, but it will be greater for those who brought us here.

    It may appear that conservative patriots are approving this neo-marxist shift by inaction, but realize that the wolf wisely waits for the opportune moment to strike. Sometimes alone, usually in packs.

    So remember this if you accept shares of the "prize" stolen by politicians from the wealth of your children's future, the sweat of your neighbor, and labor of your friend.

    Look into the eyes of your children and ask yourself if this is really what you want for their future…..

    Ask yourself if you prefer to leave them to be a sheep in the flock, or do have the independent nobility of the wolf?

    drip….. drip…… drip…….

    <img src='http://i33.tinypic.com/2j3gzrm.jpg'&gt;

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    The government can take no power the individuals don't surrender and by playing empty games of empty arguments with people who aren't actually involved intellectually with you all you manage to do is waste time. You need to be dealing with the psychology of the society at large and not so much with the offense or shock theatrics. The society is far past the point of caring and like the liberals themselves increasingly see the entire point of government as the power one gains from being in charge of it.

    Therefore whoever wins, it isn't them, and they don't care but expect all these things.

    You have to take them back to their pride, esteem and dignity. Remind them of their moral and ethical roots, of what principles they derive from their conscience as put to the world around them. Awaken them to their place in all these things.

  • http://verizonwireless.com/ ND in MD

    "…Americans will be lining up in front of their politicians begging for help with getting medical attention…"

    I have often wondered; if a corrupt impeached former governor was willing to auction off a vacated US Senate seat to the highest bidder for personal gain, what price would some politician or bureaucrat try to extract from someone in need of life saving by-pass surgery, cancer treatment etc. I just don't trust these people with my health care.

    "…our political leaders today are granted their power through election and not some sort of divine right…"

    True, but for much longer? With the ever increasing power of incumbency, selling access to power, and lack of term limits, most politicians seam to have their jobs for lifeand it is hard to get rid of them. Just look at the three stooges ND keeps sending to DC.

  • robert108

    In order to give you something, the govt has to take a lot more from someone else. There is no free lunch.

  • http://www.twitter.com/OneAndOnlyZel QueenZel
  • crshedd

    you are so right, rob.

    it is much better that we supplicate to business because the constitution supports only a capitalistic society.

    from history we have learned that business only has the interest of it's customers as it's only driving force. business does nothing to harm it's customers and only produces goods and services that make their life better in every way.

    business owners, likewise, have always (and always will), make sure their employees are well paid, well treated and safety will be the business owner's main concern.

    we need to unshackle ourselves from government and look to business for all. because they care. because they, and only they, know what is best for america and it's citizens.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Last Best Hope, you sound like a protectionist. I don't think the death of our manufacturing at the hands of organized labor and big government has been a good thing but the evolution of our economy from being based on agriculture and manufacturing to one based on "service" (and that doesn't just mean drive through jobs) isn't necessarily a bad one.

  • djer

    so Rob, it's all the union's fault that the manufacturing sector is in trouble. What about the fact that China Japan, et al, won't let us sell our products over in their countries like we allow them to do in ours.

    How about the fact that China controls its currency. It seems you will blame the unions for what ever ails this country and blindly turn your eyes on your friends the Chinese who can do no wrong in your eyes.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    oh my Rob…a society that makes nothing, imports everything, and then provides only the servicing of manufactured goods and out-sources the raw necessities of the staples of life is a society in danger.

    and sadly, that describes US this day

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    LBH is right and that doesn't make him a protectionist. The implication is profound. We do not teach anyone to make anything, and hence we do not teach that they CAN make anything. Only to USE. Eventually we must become nothing but users, hence laborers for others who make the machines. This is because if we cannot make the machines and do not learn that we can, we eventually make nothing with the machines. The skills and motivations are inherently linked.

  • studakota

    Whaddaya mean we don't make anything? We raise food like it's going out of style. Trouble is we're too nice to charge the proper price for it. We even give the stuff away. Often to countries which would soon change their tone, if we didn't. What North Dakota needs is a grain OPEC. I'm told, at most, the farmer gets, maybe, ten cents out of a loaf of $1.75 bread. What kind of crap is that? That makes you look like damn fools. Look, the oil cartel already, largely determines, what you receive for your oil, why not have "Our Breadbasket" determine what they pay for something even more important, food?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    so Rob, it's all the union's fault that the manufacturing sector is in trouble. What about the fact that China Japan, et al, won't let us sell our products over in their countries like we allow them to do in ours.

    We could sell more of our own goods in our own country if we didn't drive the price so high with unnecessary regulation, exorbitant union contracts and burdensome regulation.

    How about the fact that China controls its currency.

    And we control our currency.

    Try knowing things next time.

  • djer

    Really, Rob, you should try "knowing things next time." Are you saying the Chinese float their currency the way the US does? Really? Try again Rob.

    And are you saying that businesses would be able to provide what is needed in this country if only it was cheaper?

    Why are you avoiding the fact that we are not allowed to sell our American made competetive products in China Korea and Japan at the same amounts that those countries are allowed to import into our country?

    Why don't you ever get on your high horse about your friends, the Chinese, why they won't let us compete over there?

    Because it's too easy for you to point your finger at the american working man and say it's their fault they can't compete. You steadfastly refuse to look at the real cause. Why are you so anti-american,Rob?

    You will defend the Chinese at every turn, when they are allowed all the advantages of our markets and we are severely restricted in their markets. Way to defend the USA Rob! Anti-American!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Why don't you ever get on your high horse about your friends, the Chinese, why they won't let us compete over there?

    Because it's too easy for you to point your finger at the american working man and say it's their fault they can't compete.

    I don't care whether or not we get to compete in China, because China competing here benefits us. Do you have any idea how little purchasing power you'd have if it weren't for foreign-made products in our markets?

    I think China's protectionism is stupid, but we should trade anyway because we still win.

    And I'm not blaming the American worker, though I'm not surprised that you'd go to that bit of union-created rhetorical nonsense, but rather big government and the unions themselves for driving American business and manufacturing out of the country.

    It's not my fault you'd rather get emotional than review the facts.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Ants farm aphids. I hardly call that manufacturing.

    You really need to see what's happening to America's manufacturing scene stu. On the other hand, you can always get great machinery from India, China and Russia these days not to mention Germany, England, France and Spain. Us, not nearly so much as we used to.

    That would not be the case had we continued on to space the way we had started with the moon landings. We instead decided to retreat, and when the cold war ended, we no longer had a reason for such levels of manufacture but the rest of the world was helping build up Asia, India and to a lesser extent Africa and South America and they're still going.

    They are of course doing it with coal and oil as we did and increasingly buying into the fuel market thus lowering supply and increasing demand at the same time.

    We could have had much advanced our solar cell and electric motor technology not to mention our metals availability by sticking with lunar and orbital colonization but we didn't. What we do or not has far reaching consequence and if you don't think that's your problem because it will be generation after you are dead, you no doubt have not much good to say about those who centuries past made mistakes that led to things you dislike.

    We if nothing else have a duty to our posterity to see ahead as to what we do will mean.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    You like to cynically claim that Obama is not bringing about change then bitch that things are changing.

    He's going to bring about even more change. Change you won't like one bit.

    Maybe if the republicans hadn't failed so miserably Obama wouldn't have won!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Maybe if the republicans hadn't failed so miserably Obama wouldn't have won!

    I'd say that the only reason Obama won is because the GOP failed. They failed to be ethical. They failed to restrain spending. They failed to limit government.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Rob,

    More than that, they failed to be Republicans.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    More than that, they failed to be Republicans.

    Certainly they weren't what we should expect of Republicans.

    As far as Obama winning. He barely beat out the biggest nothing the Republicans could have nominated.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    More than that, they failed to be Republicans.

    Well, so do you Mr. Authoritarian.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Rob:

    Well, so do you Mr. Authoritarian.

    Wow, what an incredible rejoinder full of thought and introspection.

    (The preceding should be heard in the voice of John Barrowman doing his best sarcastic snark for best effect.)

    Your stock in trade of late Rob seems to be to accuse those who hold to such things as ethics and morality of being "nanny staters" and "authoritarians". At the same time, you fail to actually address the issue put to you regarding the realities of the human civilization around you and reflexively stick to your own neolibertarian talking points.

    They failed to be ethical. They failed to restrain spending. They failed to limit government.

    You're amazingly selective with the application of the word ethical, having no problems with the idea of foisting the legalization of a known mind altering drug on a society that any sane individual can clearly see is in no state of social mind to handle it and instead of encouraging them to be so before the fact, you'd rather let them deal with it individually after the fact.

    Let's see… largely sober population votes for Obama… So… what would an incredibly stoned population do? If you dare to say that a people free to ingest as much marijuana and alcohol as they like at any age would somehow be more responsible you're insulting everyone's intelligence most especially your own.

    I do not believe for one second that you seriously believe that the nation you can read about online and in the papers every day where families are broken, people are deeply neurotic, largely scattered and confused (enough to put Obama in the White House WITHOUT THINKING ABOUT IT) and filled with addictive personalities and alcoholics and drug addicts is in any proper position to practice any kind of discipline and self control.

    Therefore, that being the case, you advocate something that would be pernicious to the society you live in with disregard for their safety and welfare.

    For the sake of getting your way for there can be no other reason.

    Like a liberal.

    By the way, Hayek's line you quoted above is entirely based on his obviously flawed strawman definition of conservatism.

    Conservatism seeks to conserve the peace, safety, well being, good, decency, freedom, and all other such things of society that people would find rightful for a society that their better natures would agree with in balance and to hold against change without reason and undertaken specifically too fast for anyone to see where it is going. It is not the job of conservatism to offer new directions nor is it the job of any political movement to do so, but only to maintain the best condition of a society that may be had so as to allow the society itself to create the directions.

    It is the height of folly, as Hayek should well know with his education, that any such simple thing as a movement of politics which is inevitably hierarchical and thus inherently limited in the authorship and thus the proportioning of rewards, to be thought the genesis of societal direction but only its steward and maintainer.

    Conservatism seeks to do exactly that and no more.

  • robert108

    suite: Welcome to "counter argument by lying smear".

  • docdave

    This is because if we cannot make the machines and do not learn that we can, we eventually make nothing with the machines.

    Unlike some of you, I have personally experienced our transition from a maker society to predominantly a user society. A typical example of that is not so long ago, we were largely a agrarian society with each household capable of its own food production. That didn't mean that everyone was a farmer but that almost everyone had a garden and might have some small produce like chickens etc. Now we are largely dependent on others for our food.

  • raj58045

    Even more telling as to how the politicians think about us is their own actions. They tell us we need to sacrifice in these hard times. But we have a president who spends more on a date night than the average American makes in a year. We have a global warming alarmist who uses more energy in one household than ten Americans. Our congress guarantees their own financial success by voting themselves raises every year. We have several high ranking officials who don't even bother paying their fair share in taxes. And yet, more Americans care about who won American Idol, than what their elected officials are doing. This might be the collective slap in the face that Americans need to get their priorities straight.

  • 2Hotel9

    Sorry, leftards, the only thing an American asks the government for is to be left the fuck alone. Anyone begging the government for housing, medical care, housing and money is not an American. Period. Full stop.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    <CENTER><img src="http://i41.tinypic.com/r8gylv.jpg&quot; border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></CENTER>

    Anyone begging the government for housing, medical care, housing and money is not an American.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Suitepotato,

    Your stock in trade of late Rob seems to be to accuse those who hold to such things as ethics and morality of being "nanny staters" and "authoritarians".

    Who says that your ethics and mores are the correct ones? Better than everyone else's?

    In some places in the world it's moral to treat your wife like property, and it's ethical to bribe the local policeman so you can keep your bar open.

    The difference between you and me is that I don't want to impose my morals on anyone else. I just want to be as free as possible to live my life my way.

    I'm pro-liberty and you're not, really. At least not consistently.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development