Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, April 25, 2008

Washington Post: Who Is Going To Pay For All This New Spending Barack And Hillary Are Promising?

The Post notes that if the Democrats get their way this country is going to be bankrupt:

THE DEMOCRATIC presidential candidates have some big plans—with big price tags attached. By our calculations, using figures supplied by the campaigns, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) has proposed new spending and tax breaks that would amount to almost $265 billion a year when fully implemented, while the initiatives proposed by Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) total nearly $333 billion. Those initiatives, which would be phased in over time and which the candidates say they have identified ways of funding, don’t include billions of dollars more in one-time spending.

In addition, both candidates would extend the Bush tax cuts for those making less than $250,000 a year, at an annual cost of another $140 billion in 2012, and renew the research tax credit ($9 billion). And both say they would take steps to prevent the alternative minimum tax from sweeping in additional taxpayers, adding $50 billion or so to the annual price tag. So the deficit—even before any new spending—would be that much deeper than it would have been if the tax cuts were permitted to expire.

The bit about extending the Bush tax cuts “costing” the country money is a bit of a stretch given that, according to the CBO, federal tax revenues have grown 35% from 2003 to 2006.  Bush signed into law significant changes in the federal tax code in 2001 and 2003, meaning that those revenues came after his tax cuts.  While one cannot specifically say that the Bush tax cuts increased revenues it’s certainly more than a little facetious to say that they cost the government money.

But the larger point stands true: How in the world are we going to pay for what these Democrats are promising?  One answer is that they’re going to tax the hell out of us.

The other answer is that they’re just making promises they have no intention of following through on for the sake of getting elected.

Neither answer is very pretty.

Comments

just making promises they have no intention of following through on

Kind of like how they were going to get us out of the war (which they voted for), and how they’re gonna lower gas prices, etc.,…

Be prepared to “invest” a lot more in government if either of those two nanny-staters get into office.


""That’s the problem with you lefties, you’re not willing to get your hands dirty. I’d suggest you roll up your sleeves.”

-Jack Bauer

Hoss on April 25, 2008 at 08:58 pm

Good point, Hoss!  The last time a Democrat promised “middle-class tax cuts” we got a tax hike less than a week after inauguration… and they were made retroactive!


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on April 25, 2008 at 09:18 pm

Hey, sanni?!? Perhaps this is why white Democrats refuse to vote for Obamoid? Naw! Your right, as is Obamoid. White Democrats are racists.

Hoss, Bravo1, a friend of mine who works at Slippery Rock University(yea,I know, someone at SRU who would associate with a non-leftard. Shocking!)has been compiling a listing of all the new spending proposed by all 3 current candidates. McC comes in with a 5% raise, Obamoid and Billary both hit the charts with 9000 and 7000% raise in spending. Thats on top of current spending.

Where they going to get it, indeed.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on April 26, 2008 at 04:41 am

this country is going to be bankrupt

This country is already bankrupt or going to be bankrupt no matter who gets elected.


"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, nor from want of honor or virtue, so much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.”
- John Adams

Troy_Pineri on April 26, 2008 at 05:43 am

Keep telling yourself that lie, I’m sure it makes you all tingly in the tummy.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on April 26, 2008 at 06:02 am
Rob
Rob
17386 comments
Send a private message

This country is already bankrupt or going to be bankrupt no matter who gets elected.

So why not vote liberal then, right?

Makes perfect sense, genius.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on April 26, 2008 at 06:11 am

Socialism is all leftards are concerned with. They want to drag everyone down to the same level of misery, starvation and death as their latest hero Mugabe has in Zimbabwe. Instead of a bright, happy future they see a mouldering mass grave. Their vision of equality is death.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on April 27, 2008 at 04:17 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.