Washington Post: The Unpopularity Of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize Is Because America Is Racist
Oh, and it’s Bush’s fault too.
It is a sign of our weird political moment that the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to President Obama will probably hurt him among some of his fellow citizens.
His opponents are describing the award as premature. The deeper problem is that the Nobel will underscore the extent to which Obama is a cosmopolitan figure, much loved in European capitals because he is the change they have been looking for.
Most Americans will probably be happy to have a leader who wins acclaim around the globe. But, paradoxically, a decision made in Oslo to honor Obama’s peaceable intentions may make it more difficult for him to reconcile a body politic roiled by years of cultural warfare, partisan animosity and ideological extremism.
The effort to understand where Obama hatred comes from has been one of the few growth areas in the American economy.
There is no doubt that some of the anger is fueled by racial feeling, which is not the same as saying that all opposition to Obama is explained by racism. Most Obama opponents are simply conservative Republicans who disagree with him. But there are too many racist signs at rallies and too many overtly racial pronouncements in the fever swamps of the right-wing media to deny that racism is part of the anti-Obama mix.
Because it can’t just be that Americans think nominating a man for a Nobel Peace Prize after two weeks in office was kind of dumb. No, it has to be racism. And extremism. And disunity sowed by Bush and Republicans.
And remember that Nancy Pelosi calling tea party protesters racist, and the Obama administration accusing town hall protesters of dressing up like Hitler, didn’t contribute to this atmosphere of disunity and anger at all.
No, it’s all the Republicans fault.
And the fact that you’re racist.



