Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, December 11, 2006

Was Clinton Spying On Political Enemies? More On The Tapping Of Princess Di’s Phone

The Daily Mail:

American intelligence agencies were bugging Princess Diana’s telephone over her relationship with a US billionaire, the Mail’s sister paper has learned.

Evening Standard reports that she was even forced to abandon a planned holiday with her sons in the US with tycoon Teddy Forstmann on advice from secret services, who passed on their concerns to their British counterparts.

Both US and British intelligence then forced Diana to change her plans to stay with Mr Forstmann in the summer of 1997, saying it was too “dangerous” to take her sons there.

Instead the princess took the fateful decision to take a summer break with Harrods owner Mohamed Fayed. This ultimately led to her going to Paris with his son Dodi, where they died in a car crash.

The revelation from independent inquiries by the Evening Standard comes as it emerged that Princess Diana’s phone was bugged by US intelligence agencies on the night she died without the permission of the British secret intelligence services.

Authoritative leaks say the extraordinary revelations will be published this week by Lord Stevens and is bound to raise fresh questions about conspiracy theories. . . .

The US secret service was monitoring Diana’s friendship with the controversial financier Mr Forstmann for some weeks. . . .

The Standard has learned that Diana had agreed to a week’s holiday with princes William and Harry in the US.

She had accepted an invitation from her one-time American boyfriend Mr Forstmann to stay with him at his house in the Hamptons.

But as she was travelling with the princes, she needed the trip to be cleared by the British security services. They surprisingly vetoed Diana’s plans because of concerns about the security surrounding the billionaire’s homes or perhaps a possible threat from elsewhere.

The decision by the security services ultimately led to Diana striking up her friendship with Dodi and returning to the south of France to holiday with him.

This led to her being in Paris on 31 August, the day of the crash.

So, from appearances now, Diana had her phone bugged because of her relationship with Forstmann.  Who is Teddy Forstmann?  His Wikipedia entry seems rather devoid of anything all that controversial (as well as the entry for his company), but this jumped out at me:

Forstmann has become an advocate for the Republican platform of school vouchers, and other methods of education reform.

A little more Googling on Mr. Forstmann indicates that he is well-connected in Republican circles and a staunch advocate of school vouchers.  So, could the tapping of Diana’s phone have to do with her relationship with a well-connected Republican player here in America?  And his support of a controversial issue (school vouchers) that the Clinton Administration fiercely opposed

After all, Forstmann was spending millions on advocating for school vouchers, which at the time of Dianna’s death in 1997 was one of the biggest political issues here in America.

It’s a stretch, I know, but I just can’t fathom another reason why the Clinton administration would authorize monitoring without British approval on a dignitary as prominent as Princess Diana unless it had to do with her relationship with one of Clinton’s Republican political enemies.

The article above states specifically that the Secret Service was monitoring Diana’s relationship with Forstmann “for weeks.” Why?  Outside of being a political opponent of the Clinton administration, what other reason did the Secret Service have to be monitoring that relationship?

Comments

Very Very Interesting.  I’m sure that all of the liberals who are shocked that we’d listen in on phone conversations with known terrorists will be outraged by this.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on December 11, 2006 at 11:59 am

Maybe Clinton was looking for an opening to “slip in” if you know what I mean.


"Although I can accept talking scarecrows, lions and great wizards in emerald cities, I find it hard to believe there is no paperwork involved when your house lands on a witch.”
- Dave James

Steve L. on December 11, 2006 at 12:16 pm
Avatar for Bat One

Would anyone care to wager whether Teddy Forstmann’s was one of those 900 plus personal FBI background files ordered up by then-first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, and later blamed on the overzealous ineptitude of Craig Livingstone?  Didn’t think so.

As for FISA, y’all need to understand that its provisions are only a matter of concern when the administration is Republican and the issue in question is national security.  None of the usual cast of leftwing whiners who wailed and brayed about NSA surveillance, FISA, and the First Amendment, are going to say anything remotely salient about Clinton’s spying on political enemies.  They are, in the end, simply too dishonest and hypocritical.

Bat One on December 11, 2006 at 12:56 pm
Rob
Rob
17727 comments
Send a private message

Interesting that not one of Say Anything’s resident lefties are speaking up on this one.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on December 11, 2006 at 04:45 pm

Yep, very interesting.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on December 11, 2006 at 05:51 pm

Maybe Clinton wanted to offer her a cigar.


The secret of financial success:

If you can’t afford it, you don’t deserve it.  Even if you can afford it, that’s no reason to buy it.

robert108 on December 11, 2006 at 06:28 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

I am so glad that they were doing this instead of monitoring some chap over in some place like, say, Sudan or Afghanistan.

Robert Perry on December 12, 2006 at 08:41 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.