WaPo’s Arkin: The Troops Are Mercenaries (And The’re Lucky We Put Up With Their Rape And Torture)

The lovely Mr. Arkin, responding to this NBC News report posted here on SA yesterday:

I’ve been mulling over an NBC Nightly News report from Iraq last Friday in which a number of soldiers expressed frustration with opposition to war in the United States.
I’m sure the soldiers were expressing a majority opinion common amongst the ranks – that’s why it is news – and I’m also sure no one in the military leadership or the administration put the soldiers up to expressing their views, nor steered NBC reporter Richard Engel to the story.
I’m all for everyone expressing their opinion, even those who wear the uniform of the United States Army. But I also hope that military commanders took the soldiers aside after the story and explained to them why it wasn’t for them to disapprove of the American people.

So, all the liberals and all the war critics out there can disapprove the hell out of the troops, but the troops themselves can’t put in their two cents? They can’t express their opinions and share their experiences from on the ground in Iraq?
Methinks the arrogant big-media reporter is obliquely telling the troops to just shut up.
It gets worse:

These soldiers should be grateful that the American public, which by all polls overwhelmingly disapproves of the Iraq war and the President’s handling of it, do still offer their support to them, and their respect.
Through every Abu Ghraib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform, accepting that the incidents were the product of bad apples or even of some administration or command order.
Sure it is the junior enlisted men who go to jail, but even at anti-war protests, the focus is firmly on the White House and the policy. We just don’t see very man “baby killer” epithets being thrown around these days, no one in uniform is being spit upon.
So, we pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them, we support them in every possible way, and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war, and give up our rights and responsibilities to speak up because they are above society?

Do you get the feeling that Arkin actually thinks the soldiers should be called “baby killers” and spat upon? That they deserve? That’s certainly the feeling I get.
And what’s this talk about “every” Abu Ghraib and “every” Hadita? Those are two, isolated incidences as is pretty much every act of wrong-doing on the part of our soldiers. After those incidents the perpetrators were rounded up, given a trial and then punished. Though Arkin clearly doesn’t believe it, the majority of our soldiers are good, law-abiding people.
As for the soldiers asking us here at home to “roll over and play dead” when it comes to the war, the soldiers in that NBC report weren’t asking for that at all. They were asking the American people for understanding. Just as war critics want the public to see Iraq through their eyes, the soldiers in that video want us to see Iraq from their perspective. I don’t think that’s such an unreasonable thing, but Akin clearly does.
Amazingly, it gets even worse:

I can imagine some post-9/11 moment, when the American people say enough already with the wars against terrorism and those in the national security establishment feel these same frustrations. In my little parable, those in leadership positions shake their heads that the people don’t get it, that they don’t understand that the threat from terrorism, while difficult to defeat, demands commitment and sacrifice and is very real because it is so shadowy, that the very survival of the United States is at stake. Those Hoover’s and Nixon’s will use these kids in uniform as their soldiers. If I weren’t the United States, I’d say the story end with a military coup where those in the know, and those with fire in their bellies, save the nation from the people.

Delusional. Absolutely delusional. He goes from a few troops voicing their opinions and asking for the public to see things from their perspective to military coups and fascism.
But we haven’t quite reached the bottom of Arkin’s barrel of nastiness quite yet:

…this NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for a mercenary – oops sorry, volunteer – force that thinks it is doing the dirty work. . . .
America needs to ponder what it is we really owe those in uniform.

Everything, you jackass. We owe them everything, for without the men and women in uniform our republican democracy would no longer exist. Yes, even the ones in Iraq, because the only thing standing between this country and doom is our fearsome military’s ability to convince our enemies that attacking this country just isn’t worth it.
I’d say that it’s shameful for the Post to have published this man’s screed, but unlike Arkin I recognize that all citizens of this country – from soldiers serving on the battlefield to douche bag columnists – has a right to express themselves.
Update: More on Arkin here.

Tags: , , , , ,


«
»
  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    The great thing, the very great thing, about free speach is that sometimes the mask slips and we get a chance to see what such pustulant traitors really think.

    Freedom of Speach is not freedom from repuercussions of said free speach, nor should it be.

    With any luck the Washington comPost will enjoy the same reaction the Ditzy Chicks did.

    Out Here
    Rodney Graves
    rodney.g.graves@gmail.com

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    That is so odd that the Libs would call Anyone Baby Killers since the libs are responsible for soooooooo many millions of babies, zygotes, fetuses or whatever you choose to call those little globs of cells that if left alone grow into little humans…

  • robert108

    Whenever you hear some leftie say that he or she “supports the troops, but is against the war”, know that what Arkin says is what they really believe. Leftie hate and arrogance revealed.

  • MikeAdamson

    Bat One said

    I have mentioned before my firm belief that the far Left will not be satisfied with excoriating President Bush and trying to force a withdrawal/defeat for US forces in Iraq, but will also attempt to confuse the war in Iraq with the war on Islamist Terrorism and force a defeat there as well.

    That is always the danger when you engage in an operation like Iraq and justify it on the basis that it is a central front in the War on Terror. I suspect that enough people recognise that Iraq has little to do with the fighting terrorism and that they’ll be on board with whatever relevant measures are required to bring the terrorists to heel.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Exactly!…Well said, Lik. I am sure you confused quite a few out there though.

  • HG

    Amazing! I’m feeling the need to express myself a bit as well. Arkin, you filthy scum! I guess I should appreciate your honesty for revealing the rottenness we all knew festered within you unpatriotic, un-American, loathsome traitors, but I am to sickened by your vitriol.

  • Bat One

    Michelle Malkin has more reaction to Arkin’s screed, including some quotes posted at Arkin’s blog:

    “How dare these dead enders with no future and few — if any — other prospects not show the proper appreciation and reverence to the Washington Post and its elite cedres of thinkers…

    The next thing you know, these clowns dying in Iraq will think they deserve the right to vote.

    Poor deluded souls. How dare they defy the noblesse oblige laid bare before them.

    Or this,

    I didn’t think it was possible for anyone to simultaneously more pompous and more idiotic than John F-ing Kerry, but you’ve gone that extra mile.

    Time for the libs to circle the wagons and start braying about “free speech” again.

    Arkin isn’t all that good a writer, so that only leaves the ideological argument for hiring him in the first place.

    Pity about WaPo. Their race with the NYT appears to be as determined in reverse as it used to be toward the top of the heap.

  • http://www.sayanythingblog.com/ electnixon

    I’m glad to see all of the comments on the WaPo site. Mr. Arkin is not very popular with his readers right now.

  • Bat One

    That is so odd that the Libs would call Anyone Baby Killers…

    Zsa Zsa,

    The Libs are not exactly notorious for their logical consistency. On the contrary, their entire political philosophy is predicated on the sophistry of emotional, rather than rational, response.

  • Sluggo

    I’m glad he wrote the article. It lets us know just what the Left believes about the US, myself and my fellow servicemembers. I for one will now use the word ‘traitor’ for everyone on the left. Their cover has been blown.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    It is people like that who make me want to get a big sock and stuff it in his mouth!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    I suspect that enough people recognise that Iraq has little to do with the fighting terrorism and that they’ll be on board with whatever relevant measures are required to bring the terrorists to heel.

    Meanwhile in the real world, we’re killing terrorists left and right in Iraq.

    I hope I didn’t just confuse the “reality based community” there.

  • 2Hotel9

    The left has always hated and despised all members of the military and police. Arkin has a long history of shitting on America, our population, our military, our religions, our law enforcement, and our history.

    The days of leftards spitting on soldiers and calling them baby-killers never went away, and now we will get to see them receive the rewards they so richly deserve.

    Troops are pissed, and it ain’t Bush they are coming for.

  • Bat One

    Hugh Hewitt’s 2003 NRO article offers more details about WaPo’s execrable William Arkin,

    …since leaving the service is easier to trace. Arkin cut his teeth with the lefty Institute for Policy Studies, and went from there to positions with Greenpeace, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and Human Rights Watch. He has been a regular columnist for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

    In recent years he has taken more mainstream work as a senior fellow at the School for Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University (he appears to do most of his writing not from the SAIS campus, but from his home in Vermont).

    He is also the regular military affairs columnist for the Los Angeles Times (what a surprise that the Times employs a Greenpeace alum as its military guru) and a commentator for MSNBC…

    (I)n Arkin’s own speech to an audience at the U.S. Naval War College on September 25, 2002… (a) lengthy and vitriolic attack on the Bush administration, Arkin admitted to feeling “cynical about the fact that we are going to war to enhance the economic interests of the Enron class,” and declared that “the war against terrorism is overstated.”

    I have mentioned before my firm belief that the far Left will not be satisfied with excoriating President Bush and trying to force a withdrawal/defeat for US forces in Iraq, but will also attempt to confuse the war in Iraq with the war on Islamist Terrorism and force a defeat there as well. Arkin more than proves my point.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development