VIDEO: Obama Mouthpiece Refuses To Rule Out Fairness Doctrine

Normally I wouldn’t make a big deal out of a spokesperson refusing to rule something out. After all, if the spokesperson hasn’t been specifically briefed to answer questions on a specific issue they’ll usually issue these sort of non-committal statements until they have been briefed. But Obama has made definitive statements about the fairness doctrine before, so this shouldn’t have been something Axelrod couldn’t answer.
Unless Obama really is planning to join fellow Democrats like Debbie Stabenow, Tom Harkin and Maurice Hinchey in getting behind a resurrection of the fairness doctrine.

Toward the end of David Axelrod’s interview on Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace jumped into a lightning round of hot-button issues.
There, Wallace asked the top adviser about an issue making the rounds on both conservative and liberal radio shows, where Democratic Congressional leaders (and even Bill Clinton) have recently weighed in.
“Will you rule out reimposing the Fairness Doctrine?” asked Wallace.
“I’m going to leave that issue to Julius Genachowski, our new head of the FCC, to, and the president, to discuss,” Axelrod said. “So I don’t have an answer for you now.”
In June, press secretary Michael Ortiz told Broadcasting & Cable that “Sen. Obama does not support reimposing the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters.”
That’s clear enough. But since becoming president, it’s been difficult to get such a definitive statement.

Here’s the video:


Just another post-inauguration flip-flop for Obama.
It’s worth noting that the Obama administration has pretty close ties to liberal talk radio. Blow hards like Ed Schultz and others were reliable sycophants throughout the campaign for Obama (and in Senator Stabenow’s case, her husband actually works for Air America), so I wonder if a new fairness doctrine wouldn’t be a way for Obama to pay these folks back. Because the fairness doctrine would pretty much be welfare for liberal talk radio.
Again and again these liberal talk radio hosts fail because, to be frank, nobody wants to listen to them. But with the fairness doctrine station managers who want to keep popular, money-making shows like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck would be forced to bring on liberal talkers. Not because those liberal shows would add to their listening audiences and make money, but rather to comply with the arbitrary “fairness” of some government regulation.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Mickey

    CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and NPR would all be forced to bring on conservative talkers as well. And frankly, we outnumber them. Bring it on. Fight these bastards with their own game. An average network prime time news cast is only 12 minutes long minus all the commercials. Do you really think they are willing to give up 6 minutes of daily prime time news just to satisfy a bunch of whiny liberals in Washington?

    No way. There are legions of lawyers available to make sure we get our fair share if push comes to shove. Rush Limbaugh would be able to have a rebuttal on every network television news cast on a daily basis. He is already bigger than life. This would make him a media god.

    My advice to liberals:
    Be careful what you ask for…you may just get it.

  • John D

    CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and NPR would all be forced to bring on conservative talkers as well. And frankly, we outnumber them. Bring it on. Fight these bastards with their own game. An average network prime time news cast is only 12 minutes long minus all the commercials. Do you really think they are willing to give up 6 minutes of daily prime time news just to satisfy a bunch of whiny liberals in Washington?

    Umm, not exactly.

    The “Fairness” Doctrine specificly exempted “news” organizations. You might force them to bring someone one on to balance Olbermann but their main newscast can continue with no problem. The same with your six o’clock local newscast. As long as they report is as “news” they would be exempt.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    You’ve stated it very well, Mickey!

    Imagine that….. The NMIC [Neo-Marxist In chief] will back away from a previous promise.

    The sheep will gladly follow him into the abyss, oblivious to their own peril.

    I would suggest that Rush and the boys will not be able to offer opinion in opposition to the sewage offered up on the MSM.

    Luckily Beck has his spot on FNC. I wonder if the others would be offered a spot also…

    or will they not be able to get licensed?

  • bill-tb

    Well at least your library card is safe.

    Weird how the libtards are now all silent on civil rights.

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and NPR would all be forced to bring on conservative talkers as well.

    What about all the liberal bias built into the Network’s regular programming. Does this mean ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox and HBO are going to have to hire conservative writers, producers, actors, etc?

    Will the there be a Conservative talk show host to balance out Letterman?

  • Wing Chun Geologist

    RE: NPR’s Left, Right, and Center

    The current format of the show is to have Tony Blankley debate a liberal (Matt Miller), a leftist (A. Huffington), and a Communist (Robert Scheer).

    Will NPR have to hire a couple of ultra-right wingers to balance out the program.

    Blankley and Miller seem to be evenly matched as liberal versus conservative.

    But who’s far enough to the right to balance out Huffington and Scheer?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development