Video: Outspoken Gun Control Activists Don’t Want “Gun Free Zone” Signs In Front Of Their Homes

gun-free-zone

So-called “gun free zones” are targets for shooters. This is made clear by the fact that so many schools and campuses which are “gun free zones” are targeted, time and again, shooters. In fact, since 1950, every mass shooting in America (aside from the shooting involving former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords) has taken place in a “gun free zone.”

So perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that when citizen journalists working for James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas asked high-profile ant-gun advocates if they’d like signs on their lawn marking their homes as “gun free zones” they turned the offer down.

“I’m on your side in this,” said Star-Ledger columnist Bob Braun. “I’m just afraid it’ll be an invitation for someone with a gun.”

Funny how that works, isn’t it?

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters. He writes a weekly column for several North Dakota newspapers, and also serves as a policy fellow for the North Dakota Policy Council.

Related posts

  • Hal109

    The framework for revolution in military that the editor talked about started under Bill Clinton. 0bama has been continuing the process by promoting those who will be willing to violate their oath to support and defend the Constitution, just as he does. This is as serious as lifetime appointments to the judiciary of activist judges who also reject the Constitution.

    • Hal109

      Here is another guy who ignores the Constitution and is advising 0bama to do the same.

      “There are steps that President Obama can take without congressional
      approval at any time he chooses with just one stroke of the pen,”
      Bloomberg told the mixed audience of students and scholars, speaking at the “Gun Policy Summit” at John Hopkins University.

      Yes, just like any dictator can. All you need is a pen!

      • $8194357

        Every day statist tyrany comes from the tip of a pen.

    • $8194357

      10X

  • HG

    Looks like liberals know in their heart of bleeding hearts that criminals will always have guns and people without them are easy targets.

    • yy4u2

      Maybe in their hearts but certainly not in their heads.

  • Onslaught1066

    In order to have the courage of your convictions, one must first have courage.
    A degenerate people or party that would gladly exchange freedom for security has no courage and soon, no security.

    • yy4u2

      In other words, it’s a long muddy road we continue to slip along. A shame some people prefer a Yugo instead of a 4 wheel drive.

  • http://flamemeister.com flamemeister

    High comedy! Funny in so many depressing ways.

  • $8194357

    Liberal ideologs are hypocrits, huh.

  • mickey_moussaoui

    The libs believe themselves to be the moral superiors to the common man. A leftist takes their selective position on issues that allow them to look and feel good. As shown in this story about “gun free zone signs” they have little interest in the actual consequences for others. Any current event that rubs them wrong turns into another liberal crusade. Obama is their Pied Piper. Unfortunately we are stuck with these useful idiots for awhile.

  • Hannitized, Proofs obsession

    With all the proud gun owning CEO’s running around threatening to kill gun control activists, this reaction is not surprising.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kv4E7eDdVzg

    • HG

      I don’t know, H. One CEO does not make for “all the proud gun owning CEO’s” you claim. I’ll assume you know there are more than one nut on the left that have called for disarming and even killing gun owners. We can compare loons all day.

      • Hannitized, Proofs obsession

        I haven’t seen any CEO’s from left wing companies calling for civil war and asking for others to start killing people. Have you?

    • Random Passerby

      so tarring a whole class based on the actions of one is now acceptable? Excellent…
      When are the journalists going to take responsiblity for Saville’s pederasty? (he was a journalist, after all)
      When are the socialists going to take responsibility for the Nazi Party’s rise to power? (note they were national SOCIALISTS)
      When will Democrats take responsibility for Racism in the South (KKK was founded by a Democrat)
      When will Hollywood take responsibility for the Joker shootings (inspired by a Hollywood movie)

  • SusanBeehler

    In North Dakota we will not have to worry about posting signs at schools and churches because HB 1283 if passed will allow for guns in schools and churches also HB1224 repeals many of our gun laws on the books now, so it will no longer be an offense if you carry in your vehicle,carry any concealed weapon and no penalty if you don’t have a licence to carry.

    • HG

      Susan, do you think criminals currently do not carry their guns because the law says they can’t?
      Susan, do you think lawful gun owners are a threat because they carry their firearm?

      • $8194357

        Sheople…
        What to do with all the lemming sheople?

        • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

          Don’t worry, gun nut. Those people typically register gop.

          • $8194357

            Do you grow fat eating nothing but reivisinism and lies?
            Your intellectualy and moraly starving…

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            English, gun nut, English.

          • $8194357

            Why you have to be racist to our friends from the south boob..
            Always complaining folks don’t use the english lanquage….
            Liberal hypocrit….Next thing ya will be against government welfare documents written in spanish or something, huh.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            English, gun nut, English.

          • yy4u2

            Got nothing again eh cocaine base bob? Seasons change. You n your ilk don’t.

      • Guest

        HorridGas, do you think that just because something will still occur we shouldn’t even bother trying to minimize it? HorridGas, do you think a lunatic killing an entire classroom of kindergarteners is not a threat, let alone the countless individuals who die unnecessarily each day because of gun violence?

        • Hal109

          You missed the point. Law abiding citizens will be able to defend the innocent children from the lunatic. You see, law abiding citizens follow the “no gun zone” rules, lunatics don’t.

          • Guest

            Armed law abiding citizens didn’t stop the Aurora, Co shooting or Fort Hood shooting or Columbine. Your bullsh*t is so thin and transparent, you probably are suffering from a severe case of diarrhea.

          • Hal109

            All three of your examples were “gun free zones” so there could not have been a law abiding citizen present to stop them. You completely discredited your own argument again.

            Even if your argument was on point, there will be times where no armed person will be able to help but why take away all possibility?

          • SusanBeehler

            Why take all the possibility away with not supporting changes which may deter gun violence? Such as requiring background checks on all guns, even guns sold at gun shows and the ones you buy from the neighboring states from other gun owners.

          • sbark

            apparently the military couldnt even stop the Food Hood Shootings—they were essentially disarmed when that “islamist” opened fire on them…..
            …..and yet we are supposed to trust the govt to protect us………we be like the kulaks hearing the jack boots coming up the steps in the middle of the night as the Leftists finally got to our house.

          • SusanBeehler

            If law abiding will defend the innocent children from the lunatics,where were they at Sandy Hook? What was the law abiding “mom” who allowed her son access to her AR15 defending?

      • SusanBeehler

        No
        No, but you should clarify “threat”, I believe someone carrying a lawful or unlawful gun could be a “threat” to perpetrators or even to people they know depends on the situation. Responsible gun owners would not be a threat to people they know because they would be “responsible”. It is not necessarily a question of legal or illegal it is a question of the mindset who is carrying.

        • Spartacus

          Britain already has the gun bans in place you want in place. If you’re really that scared of those evil guns maybe you should just emigrate. I’m sure you’d feel much safer much sooner.

          • SusanBeehler

            I don’t feel unsafe. If I felt unsafe i would use a name like Spartacus rather than my real name. Maybe if you want to fight tyrannical government you could emigrate to Uganda.

          • Onslaught1066

            Interesting that of all the dictatorships out there in the world, that you would, quite naturally, gravitate to an African dictatorship.

            What kind of white robed and hooded skeletons are hiding in your racist little closet, M’Lardy?

          • SusanBeehler

            Well, KILLER, it is the only country I could think of where the war is already started and I figured they would welcome some guns. You pick different one if you don’t like my choice.

          • Onslaught1066

            Of course it was, now all we need to do is figure out what kind of a racist you are that that was your “go to” example.

            I don’t need to pick a different location, I’m only concerned with the state of affairs in my country, unlike you racist globalists.

          • SusanBeehler

            Of course I don’t need to pick a location because I love my country and I don’t have to shoot a gun to proof it. You can’t write a post without calling someone a name. When did this habit start for you?

          • Onslaught1066

            The instant I met my first liberal.

          • Spartacus

            Why should I leave? Between you and 0bammAA- there’s plenty of third world tyranny to be fought right here right now without paying for a plane ticket and a prostate check to board the plane.

          • SusanBeehler

            Why should I leave?

          • Spartacus

            You don’t like guns, they don’t allow them in Britain, you’d feel right at home. Why stay where you’re uncomfortable? Would you stay at a motel where you felt that way?

          • SusanBeehler

            Thank you for your thoughtful concern. I am very comfortable right where I am at.

          • Spartacus

            Apparently you’re really not very comfortable. You seem to have very deep issues with your personal rights and those of your friends and fellow citizens. If you can’t even be honest with yourself, how can you expect to be honest with others?

          • SusanBeehler

            That is really, deep

          • Onslaught1066

            Sure you’re comfortable… Right up until your bulk melds with the fabric of your couch and they come to forklift your butt to the hospital.

          • SusanBeehler

            You seem to obsess about the size of something/someone; my guess you have a “size” issue. What makes you think you have the right to call people names and be so insulting?

          • Onslaught1066

            1st amendment protection of my God given right to free speech.

            What makes you think you have the right to eat like a pig and torture large land animals with your immense gravitational pull.

          • SusanBeehler

            Cyber Bully

          • Onslaught1066

            When confronted with the truth, M’lardy munched a Baby Ruth™.

            Overeating is a coping mechanism with which you are intimately acquainted, and it shows.

          • yy4u2

            Because your neighbors cling to Bibles and religion or because they are under your control?

          • SusanBeehler

            I am sorry do you think Onslaught1066 clings to his Bible and worships at a Bully pulpit “under ???? control”, When someone uses bullying name-calling (check out his long list with his posts) he may think it is freedom of speech but it is certainly not Godly. Everyone has a choice, God allows this, it is the choice they choose. Why would someone like Onslaught1066 continue to use the foul name calling directed toward me and others if it did not serve some kind of purpose/meaning to him? I would hardly call it clinging to a Bible, it may be his religion, but it is NASTY and MEAN. yy4u2 you justify his foul mouth with a Bible? Which Bible are you reading?

          • Onslaught1066

            Poor hanniturdlet, it grieves me to see you so despondent.

            Why don’t you go eat something? That always makes you feel better, though from the look of things not for very long.

        • camsaure

          Well, in your case it would be best if you refrained from carrying.

          • SusanBeehler

            Camsaure, Onslaught and Spartacus are blog bullies,we could also throw in two amber lights who likes to chime in with you; you give conservatives, Republicans a “bad” name. When many people think of a Republican they name off the qualities you seem to amulet on this blog, bully, jerk, lacking intelligence,out of control, radical, gun “lovers”;you are the poster images and actual helped the “liberal” leader you hate take the votes at the poll. You all are very good at shooting off your foot, shooting off your mouth and than fulfill the prophecy of “doomsday” when your rights go to the chopping block. Keep it up and maybe your “dream” of “dictatorship” will materialize.

          • lb

            You’re under the impression that folks on “your side” are better than others, and they’re not. Just look to Rob’s little pet troll, willie bonilla (hannitized), the documented tax cheat who sleeps with filthy, infected men and woman, out of wedlock and then brags what an upstanding citizen he is while judging others who have sex without the benefit of marriage.. He criticizes gun owners, all the while owning semi automatic weapons himself. That’s the kind of scum on “your side.”

            “The responsible women told me right before we were going to have sex and indicated they were having a “break out”. HSV-1 or HSV-2. I just wanted to hit it because we worked together and because of the tension. I take pills for Chlamydia just to be safe, because its hard to diagnose and is most common in women.”

            Hannitized on May 10, 2009 at 10:13 am

            HAWAII.GOV

            Bureau of Conveyances -Official Public
            Records

            Document
            Number R2007203358

            Recording Date
            Recording Date:

            Date instrument recorded.
            YYYY-MM-DD

            2007-11-21

            Document Category:

            Judgment/Lien
            Conveyance
            Miscellaneous
            Mortgage
            Release
            Uniform
            Commercial Code

            Description

            NOTICE OF LIEN
            (INCLUDES COUNTY, FEDERAL & STATE TAX LIENS; MARITIME LIEN)

            Grantor Grantor:

            Party transferring
            interest.

            BONILLA WILLIAM
            L II

            Grantee Grantee:

            Party acquiring interest.

            HAWAII
            STATE-TAX

          • SusanBeehler

            Hmm, you are a strange one, Do you have an inferiority complex? I thought people on this blog were on the same “side” finding a solution to prevent the incident like the one which happened at Sandy Hook? Not sure which side you are on in this discussion, I did not know it was about the person you are referring to, actually I do not get your point and I not interested in who you say is having sex with who. As far as quoting a blog post, you truly believe someone was posting that as the truth and not sarcasm? Do NOT believe all things you read especially on a blog and this is a blog; assuming a comment out of context of the thread could make you, you know appear as ASSuming.

          • Hal109

            Susan, conservatives are proponents of freedom, freedom based upon unalienable rights that were adopted by the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Amendments to the Constitution. You can be demeaning by calling people dumb, radical and gun lovers but let me ask you a few questions.

            1. Is it radical to be a strong proponent regarding protecting freedom of speech? Freedom of the press? Peaceful assembly?

            2. Is it radical to to be a strong proponent of limiting the government from unreasonable searches and seizures of your person or possessions?

            3. Is it radical to oppose government policies that allow citizens to be held against their will, without charge, indefinitely?

            4. Is it radical to argue that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the States or to the people?

            What you have been doing, regularly on this blog, is selectively applying rights as you see fit to fulfill your personal wants, needs and desires. That is not how freedom works. Would it be fair to force you to register to use your freedom of speech? That you need to apply every 5 years to maintain that right? That you could only use that right 7 times per day? Do you really need the right to speak freely more that 7 times per day? Do we need as many press outlets as we have now?

            Keep demeaning those of us who embrace all of the tenants of the Constitution. When the government grants itself the power to selectively adhere to the limits place upon it by that document, then your dream of dictatorship will have materialized.

          • SusanBeehler

            Hal109 what part of my post do you see your blog name?
            “Camsaure, Onslaught and Spartacus are blog bullies we could also throw in two amber lights”

            Are you condoning the nasty name calling these people like to post. Any meaningful discussion has no place for name calling, because it just becomes a contest to see who can say the most foul things and aims at devoiding the words from a living breathing individual. NO one, NO person, NO blogger is all right or all left or all Liberal or all Conservative, labels and name calling makes many have the sense they have the “right” to call you whatever they want because they have defined you as that label, rather than finding the common denominator, we all bleed RED, every person, just like our Constitution was written for each person, not just the left not just the right, it was written for the people. When those I mention resort to degrading name calling, they are giving themselves the permission to step on a person as if they are a bug, I believe that is neither right or left, it is just nasty and mean. Hal109 if you want to come to their defense do so on the merits of their words. Take a stand against these guys with your words who want to bully with name calling. It is bullying and you Hal109 are the bystander, what is your next move?

          • Hal109

            I could care less about who you accuse of cyber bullying. It is notable that you ignored the substance of my post.

          • Onslaught1066

            Cyber Bully/Cyber Stalker, a hanniturdlet is a hanniturdlet, no matter how big.

          • Hal109

            As of now, you have 773 posts on SAB. You have thrown plenty of mud yourself, now you claim victim status.

          • SusanBeehler

            I am not a victim. How many posts do you have? You do not want to take a stand against nasty name calling, do you? You want to defend them and further the “cause” you believe you ally with them on, even if they have nasty behavior. Do also believe boys will be boys too, and if these names are directed at a person on this blog, this behavior is okay? Would this name calling directed at me or any other woman be acceptable at work, at church, at school, a coffee group,a playground? Just because this is a blog and it is called say anything does not mean we have to stand by and not call anyone out on just plain meanness.

          • Hal109

            Neither you nor I will ever be able to stop name calling on this forum or any other. I don’t care, so I ignore it and try to focus on the issues. Every once in a while I throw a little elbow back. I really have so much more important things in life that I won’t let any bully ruin my day.

            Don’t let people drag you down, and read our founding documents to develop a better understanding of their true meaning. I can tell from your answer above that you are still looking at this from your own personal needs, wants and desires. That is not what this is about.

          • SusanBeehler

            I care and no one ruins my day.

          • camsaure

            Like I said, I consider it an honor to be despised by the likes of you. Thanks again.

          • SusanBeehler

            1. no 2.no 3.no 4.no you ignored the “jest” of my post. It was not directed toward you but I am certainly willing to have a dialogue with you.

          • SusanBeehler

            We do have limits on our freedom of speech. Stalking,Protection orders, bully policies in schools, not yelling fire, are all limits on our freedom of speech and we have limits of where we can speak and when. Go to a government meeting and try speaking any time any way, you will not be allowed to, there are limits on our freedom of speech. Are you not being selective in choosing to compare the 1st amendment to terms some use when speaking about the 2nd amendment? Those are your views of what you think is being said, I have never stated or even suggested anything
            for 5 years, or 7 times, those are limits you have in your mind, in your view and our transferring it onto who you think I am.
            I am Susan Beehler and I am a proponent of freedom. I was not calling you or anyone else those names I listed. I was stating this is how many republicans are labeled and people who are the bullies are used as the example of who Republicans are.
            Which do you think is more demeaning “gun lover”, “dumb” or “radical” or the names being used by those I am calling cyber bullies? The words the cyber bullies have used towards me are idiot, ugly, M’lardy, boob, Child diddler,psychotic,fat,hanniturd,
            chick, hippo, pie-scian, lardy, buttfuckle, Homicidal Genital, Lardy,girth, bullet catcher, child killer, kid hater, shooter, hanniturdette, hanniturdlet, bovine. I could do a poll but I think most would find the names used by those you seem to want to defend are much more disrespectful, demeaning and serve little value except to bully those they are directed act. Freedom of speech does not protect bullies,eventually their words will compel themselves to commit an action which crosses the legal line and cut their freedom short. For a bully to utter such words reflects there willing to use whatever weapon they have available whether it be their words or their gun, they are people who like to control. Hal are you the bystander at the blog “playground” or can you take a stand?

          • Onslaught1066

            I sure as hell wouldn’t yell fire if it was your shack going up,

            Speaking of playground, why don’t you waddle back to your sandbox of irrelevance and continue to bob for Tootsie Rolls™.

          • Hal109

            Ok. So, If I yell “FIRE” in a crowded theater, should you be required to be licensed to speak freely? Or should the offender be prosecuted for the crime he/she committed? I have done nothing wrong, yet my rights are being encroached upon.

          • camsaure

            Well said!

          • camsaure

            As long as I give conservatives and republicans a bad name in YOUR eyes, I consider that a sucess and honor as I really have no desire to be liked by anyone whom is willing to infringe on my God given constitutional rights. All you libs/socialists/progressives/communists/marxists be damned.

          • SusanBeehler

            Hate to disappoint you; God did not give you the Constitution. God created us. You may have missed my point of name calling, bullying. Damn all you want but if you feel the need to label; call me by name Susan, it is who I am.

          • camsaure

            Boy are you ever ignorant. As the constitution CLEARLY states “we are endowed by God certain Inaleinable rights. Those rights ARE from God and clearly PROTECTED by the constitution. This is clearly speeled out to protect from attacks on those rights by leftist/statist/communists/marxist/progressives and SUSAN.

          • SusanBeehler

            The constitution says what God has given you?
            clearly “speeled” not very clear in your writing. If you use the name God in a document you are protected from attacks?

          • camsaure

            Like I said ignorant, That said, I will also repeat what I have said to the other blog clogger trolls: I will not participate in helping you to fill the blog with meaningless diatribe, In other words I refrain from mud wrestling pigs because after all, pigs like mud.

      • yy4u2

        Susan doesn’t think but thanks for trying to ask her.

  • SusanBeehler

    How is the rally for Guns Across America going to be safe because it is being held in a “gun free zone”, a public gathering? Everyone will know they could be a target because they will be gathering without their guns. Do you really think it will be safe?

Top