US Troops Ambushed By Terrorists, Civilians Get Killed

Sigh…

Afghans: U.S. troops shot at civilians
JALALABAD, Afghanistan – U.S. Marines fleeing a militant ambush Sunday opened fire on civilian cars and pedestrians on a busy highway in eastern Afghanistan, wounded Afghans said. Up to 16 people were killed and 34 wounded in the violence, officials said.
A suicide attacker detonated an explosives-filled minivan as the American convoy approached, then militant gunmen fired on the troops inside the vehicles, who returned fire, the U.S. military said.
As the Americans sped away, they treated every car and person along the highway as a potential attacker, said Mohammad Khan Katawazi, the district chief of Shinwar. But Maj. William Mitchell, a U.S. military spokesman, said those killed and injured may have been shot by the militants.
More than a half dozen Afghans recuperating from bullet wounds told The Associated Press that the U.S. forces fired indiscriminately along at least a six-mile stretch of one of eastern Afghanistan’s busiest highways — a route often filled not only with cars and trucks but Afghans on foot and bicycles.

So our troops get ambushed. They fight back, citizens get caught in the middle and die.
And who gets blamed for this, by the media indirectly and the loony left directly? Why our troops, of course. It doesn’t matter that nobody would have died had these terrorists not attacked us. It doesn’t matter that there would be peace in Afghanistan, and Iraq, if the terrorists would just lay down their arms. Nope, our troops (and not the suicide-bombing, fight-from-behind-the-civilians terrorist cowards) are to blame for all the death and carnage in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    RW: Glad you finally availed yourself of a dictionary. Glad I could be of some assistance in your education.

    Out here.
    Proof

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    RotoWooter,

    Again, stick to what you know, because you obviuosly don’t know much about Abu Ghraib.

    1. The “story” broke when Central Command announced the charges.
    2. The perpetrators of the illegal acts (they were indeed illegal under the UCMJ) were tried before courts martial.
    3. The culpable commander (a Clinton general) was relieved for cause and accepted reduction in rate and retirement vice a trial by court martial.

    Your ignorance is simply astounding.

    Out Here
    Rodney Graves
    rodney.g.graves@gmail.com

  • Mark D

    OOOOOOOHHHH
    That hurts my feelings danceboy

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    RotoWooter,

    Your methods reveal your origins and give further evidence of the lies you spread.

    Out Here
    Rodney Graves
    rodney.g.graves@gmail.com

  • robert108

    FYI: The real torture, rape and murder at Abu Ghraib took place under Saddam. The stuff you refer to was mostly overhyped lies and exaggerations done for political purposes. Anything to “Get the President”.
    The “piles of bodies” under Saddam were dead and mutilated ones.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Yeah, they were happy to be at Abu Ghraib.

    which, for all its excesses which were remedied, was far better than it was under the reign of Saddam.
    But, I guess you pabulum-puking torture, rape and murder apologists can’t see the difference!

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I know, I have to teach you how to think. Which is not a hard task, you seem more educable than most.

    Those that can, do. Those that can’t, teach.

  • Ronald Walter

    The first post was on topic. The ad hominem slug fest then followed. You gleefully joined the pack of wolves.

    ‘Bout all you have done since then is cry wolf.

    It’s your choice.

    All is fair in love and war.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    That hurts my feelings danceboy

    You don’t have to be a dick about it. I’m just saying that your trolls are so ridiculous that you won’t catch many fish. It’s too obvious. If you want to play your game, learn to play it right.

  • Ronald Walter

    Yeah, they were happy to be at Abu Ghraib.

    They were jumping for joy in those piles of naked bodies.

    It was campfires, kumbayah, and s’mores all through the night.

  • robert108

    …the fresh cellophane wrapped bouquets of flowers…

    Pure silliness.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    RotoWooter bloviates:

    The fact of the matter is this: The leaders of the United States ordered the invasion of Iraq. They are responsible for all that happened over there. Those ‘perpetrators’ are not responsible, the leaders of the United States are.

    You really have no clue whatsoever, do you? National Command Authority is responsible for what it orders. Abu Ghraib, which YOU cited, was contrary to the orders, policy, and doctrine of the NCA. Those who committed those acts in violation of law and standing orders were tried and convicted at courts martial. NCA would only have been culpable had they been aware of such violations and failed to prosecute those responsible for them.

    Please don’t ignore facts. Your feckless attempts to mitigate them have no merit.

    You have as yet to come up with ANY facts which actually support any of your positions.

    You’re out there alright.

    For which you should be thanking whatever gods you worship.

    Out Here
    Rodney Graves
    rodney.g.graves@gmail.com

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Ronald Walter trolls, Yeah, they were happy to be at Abu Ghraib.

    Only a ridiculous partisan such as yourself would equate the general population of Iraq to the relatively few who were at Abu Ghraib.

    Feel free to start engaging in honest debate. Surprise us.

    Mark D – your comments are worthless anymore. You’ve become a caricature.

  • Ronald Walter

    Mr. Graves, so what? Again, too.

    The fact of the matter is this: The leaders of the United States ordered the invasion of Iraq. They are responsible for all that happened over there. Those ‘perpetrators’ are not responsible, the leaders of the United States are.

    Please don’t ignore facts. Your feckless attempts to mitigate them have no merit.

    You’re out there alright.

  • Mark D

    lik

    you mean the fresh cellophane wrapped bouquets of flowers that the desert dwellers had in their walk in coolers? Those flowers?

  • Ronald Walter

    When were the facts concerning the war crimes committed at Abu Ghraib discounted?

    When have the facts concerning what took place at Abu Ghraib been proven false?

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    RotoWooter,

    You just can’t stay on topic, can you?

    What you have posted here today is day to day fare on most of the LLL sites, which tells us all we really need to know about where you come from and what you bring with you.

    Pride and Ignorance are a deadly combination you would do well to forsake.

    Out Here
    Rodney Graves
    rodney.g.graves@gmail.com

  • robert108

    The general population of Iraq was in Abu Ghraib under Saddam, but under us, only the terrorists were in Abu Ghraib. Big difference.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I have to teach you how to think

    That’s a little like getting dieting tips from Michael Moore and tact lessons from Ann Coulter!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    “feckless”- clueless

    Priceless!

  • Ronald Walter

    I know, I have to teach you how to think. Which is not a hard task, you seem more educable than most.

    The officers in the military are merely following orders.

    Orders from the Commander in Chief; his name we all know. He is responsible for all that has taken place in Iraq, like it or not.

    Rush ‘gimme another pill until I go deaf’ Limbaugh has done a good job of brainwashing you into a ‘ditto head.’ That’s why your single cell brain has turned to mush. Stupid drug addicts don’t know when to quit.

    You might even qualify to become a true, rock-ribbed Republican.

    That might take more time. I’ll check back later to see how you’re doing. Do you want me to contact a brain surgeon to help me out to increase your obvious lack of brain capacity?

    I’ll return your goat too, providing that you promise to give it proper care and affection.

    Don your thinking cap… it’s about time.

  • Ronald Walter

    feckless
    adj 1: not fit to assume responsibility
    2: generally incompetent and ineffectual; “feckless attempts to
    repair the plumbing”; “inept handling of the account”
    [syn: inept]

    Source: Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

    Feckless \Feck”less\, a. [Perh. a corruption of effectless.]
    Spiritless; weak; worthless. [Scot]

    http://dict.die.net/feckless/

    Try to picture yourself as ‘Proof.’

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Dick Cheney thought Iraqis were going to give Coalition forces flowers; that’s how out of touch he is.

    Dick Cheney and the rest of the chickenhawks need to get a clue.

    Many Iraqis did greet American forces with flowers and praise. They were happy to see us.

    Thanks for showing us how out of touch you are.

  • Ronald Walter

    All is fair in love and war.

    The Marines are just defending themselves. What else do you expect them to do? Give them flowers?

    Dick Cheney thought Iraqis were going to give Coalition forces flowers; that’s how out of touch he is.

    Dick Cheney and the rest of the chickenhawks need to get a clue.

    Here is the first clue: All is fair in love and war.

  • Ronald Walter

    You should try one sometime yourself.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development