Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

US Death Toll In Iraq The Lowest In 8 Months

So, naturally, the Associated Press goes into full spin mode.

BAGHDAD—American military deaths for July rose to 73 on Tuesday with the report of a Marine killed in combat, but the toll was still the lowest in eight months as the U.S. said it was gaining control of former militant strongholds.

By contrast, July was the second-deadliest month for Iraqis so far this year, according to an Associated Press tally.

That last sentence, I’m sure, was meant to convey the idea that Iraq is still hopeless.  Yet the fact that the Iraqi death toll is going up as ours is going down is evidence of Iraqis stepping to the front of this war.  Which is what we’ve wanted all along, no?

Anyway, after spending two sentences on the topic laid out on the headline the article veers off into nine paragraphs of unrelated news about the political turmoil in Iraq before getting back to the point:

American officials credited the drop in U.S. casualties with the new strategies put in place by commander Gen. David Petraeus, who has taken the fight to the enemy rather than keeping forces in defensive bases.

“We’re chasing them to areas where they’re not so well prepared and they don’t have time to prepare, so chances are we will have fewer casualties,” a senior U.S. military official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the sensitive operations. “The tactical momentum has shifted to us.”

The No. 2 commander in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, expressed cautious optimism last week about the decline in deaths.

He said casualties had increased as U.S. forces expanded operations into militant strongholds in the initial stages of the five-month-old security crackdown to clamp off violence in Baghdad. Now, he said, casualties were dropping as Americans gained control in those areas.

Gee, it’s almost like the surge is working or something.  Now if we could just get the media to report that in a straight-forward manner, we’d really be getting somewhere.

Comments

Again with the numbers.

These were 73 brave, patriotic, American, human beings.

1 (one) is way too many.

General Schwarzkopf wept openly on national TV because he lost 148 soldiers in combat during Desert Storm. That is a true General.

ews48 on July 31, 2007 at 07:49 pm

July 2007: 77
July 2006: 46
July 2005: 58
July 2004: 58
July 2003: 49

Military Fatalities: By Month

WOOF on July 31, 2007 at 08:03 pm
Avatar for Greg

I only hope that another Tet like offensive is not in the making. If the insurgents were to have a large scale offensive right before General Petraeus was to go before congress to report on the surge it could play into the Democrat’s hands.

Greg on July 31, 2007 at 08:17 pm

WOOF, that’s called undersampling your data...which is a form of statistical fallacy.

If you want to divide it into yearly blocks, you need to do it by year...not just by decimation.  I guess you “reality-based” lefties neglected to take any math courses…

Carrick on July 31, 2007 at 08:41 pm

Five Julys are better than one.

US Casualties By Calendar Year
Year US Deaths US Wounded
2003 486 2409
2004 849 8002
2005 846 5948
2006 822 6398
2007 650 3801
Total 3653 26558

If you know the math, you can do the standard deviations, chi squared tests and regressions,

WOOF on July 31, 2007 at 09:07 pm

Here’s Rob’s statistics broken down into 6-month running averages… this is just for illustration’s purposes, not to argue any particular point.

Feb 2007 - Jul 2007 94.5
Jan 2007 - Jun 2007 96
Dec 2006 - May 2007 97.8
Nov 2006 - Apr 2007 88.5
Oct 2006 - Feb 2007 88.8
Sep 2006 - Jan 2007 87.3
Aug 2006 - Dec 2006 84.6667

Of course it’s not surprising that a sudden downturn in causalities in a the last month of the war doesn’t affect a six-month average, is it?

This is all just to say that there are mathematically correct ways to generate trends, and others that are just mathematical garbage.  Asking for a trend across July’s is plain old-fashion garbage...regardless of who is doing it.

Carrick on July 31, 2007 at 09:09 pm
Avatar for Lestat

How come your six month averages don’t start and end in the same month each year?

Lestat on July 31, 2007 at 09:12 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

General Schwarzkopf wept openly on national TV because he lost 148 soldiers in combat during Desert Storm. That is a true General.

So I guess General Eisenhower isn’t a “real general” unless he cried on D-day.

These were 73 brave, patriotic, American, human beings.

Nobody is claiming otherwise.  The point of this post was more about media spin than anything else.  Day after day we get indicators like this from Iraq which show that we’re making headway, and day after day the media spins.

It’s pathetic.

1 (one) is way too many.

If that’s true, this country is in a lot of trouble.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 31, 2007 at 09:28 pm

Because I was using running averages… Here are the 6-month running averages, at six-month spacings:

Feb 2007 - Jul 2007 94.5
Nov 2006 - Apr 2007 84.7
Feb 2006 - Jul 2006 55.8
Nov 2005 - Apr 2006 74
Feb 2005 - Jul 2005 59.5
Nov 2004 - Apr 2005 87.7
Feb 2004 - Jul 2004 63.8
Nov 2003 - Apr 2004 46.5

(Technically this should be three month intervals, but this is close enough...)

Of course, all this points out is that we’ve had a higher causality rate since the surge...that is an obvious consequence of putting our people at risk.

Carrick on July 31, 2007 at 09:38 pm
Avatar for Lestat

Sorry, I read your post wrong. 

However I don’t find it suprising that as summer gets hotter deaths get lower, as all activity gets lower.  I think its a little early to declare victory.

Lestat on July 31, 2007 at 09:45 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Nice strawman, Lestat, but who is declaring victory?

This is the problem with the left.  It’s like we’re not even allowed to be the least bit optimistic about Iraq.  You say “Hey, maybe this strategy is working” and in return you get accused of “declaring victory.”

Maybe if you libs hadn’t tied yourself to the idea that Iraq is a failure you could be a little more open-minded.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 31, 2007 at 09:52 pm

Lestat:

However I don’t find it suprising that as summer gets hotter deaths get lower, as all activity gets lower.  I think its a little early to declare victory.

I happen to agree with the latter part of your statement but not the former.

Clearly we have overwhelmed the insurgents with our recent surge.  Whether they are really destroyed or just regrouping to attack us again remains to be seen.  In the past, they’ve proven to be a very smart, versatile opponent. 

If they lose, it will be because the Iraqi people turn against them.  Of course there are strong signs of that in both Diyala and Anbar province.  It appears that some of the al Qaeda in Iraq at least have overstayed their welcome, and that many of the rest of the insurgents are willing to fight with the US against a now recognized common enemy.

See for example this from the New York Times and this from Michael Yon.

There is a sea-change going on in Iraq.  Whether it is permanent remains yet to be seen.

Carrick on July 31, 2007 at 09:53 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

There is a sea-change going on in Iraq.  Whether it is permanent remains yet to be seen.

This is where I’m at, but what I’m cynical about is that Bush’s political opposition in this country is so entrenched in their “Iraq is lost” position that they aren’t going to recognize any progress in Iraq regardless of the facts on the country.

And by “political opposition” I mean most of the press too.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 31, 2007 at 09:57 pm

Rob:

This is where I’m at, but what I’m cynical about is that Bush’s political opposition in this country is so entrenched in their “Iraq is lost” position that they aren’t going to recognize any progress in Iraq regardless of the facts on the country.

You and I are very much in agreement on this.

In fact the “lost in Iraq” is so entrenched among the left, they almost get violent when I show them some of Michael Yon’s writings....  I suppose they just feel.. betrayed when they see the NYT and other mainstream newspapers publishing “pro-Iraq isn’t a hopeless quagmire” stories.

Carrick on July 31, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Here’s my prediction: Nothing major is going to happen in Iraq until September.  In the build-up to Petraeus’ report to Congress in that month, there will be an active but subtle attempt to run Petraeus down.

Then, when Petraeus finally does give his report, it will be spun.  His report will have some negative aspects to it (nobody is expecting things to be perfect in Iraq by September) and that’s what will be focused on regardless of the rest of the contents of his report.

The media will spin, the Democrats will grandstand, key Republicans will lose their spine and the war will be lost.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 31, 2007 at 10:24 pm

I only hope that another Tet like offensive is not in the making. If the insurgents were to have a large scale offensive right before General Petraeus was to go before congress to report on the surge it could play into the Democrat’s hands.

Actually, the original Tet Offensive was a huge defeat for the VC, but the US media lied about it, which turned the American public against the Vietnam War.  They lied us out of Vietnam.  The only real danger to us in Iraq is the MSM and the Dems.  The terrorists can’t defeat our military, but the Dems could create defeat by lying, like they have been doing all along.


"If the good men are silent only the wicked are heard.” - Edmund Burke

robert108 on July 31, 2007 at 11:16 pm
Avatar for Greg

Actually, the original Tet Offensive was a huge defeat for the VC, but the US media lied about it, which turned the American public against the Vietnam War.  They lied us out of Vietnam.  The only real danger to us in Iraq is the MSM and the Dems.  The terrorists can’t defeat our military, but the Dems could create defeat by lying, like they have been doing all along.

My point exactly, but you explained it much better.

Greg on August 1, 2007 at 06:32 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.