Say Anything Blog

So who’s supposed to pick up the legal bills of these two? 

Miscarriage of justice indeed?

You would think that the defense lawyers would have pointed out that they relied on counsel’s instructions.  If so why did it go so long?

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

The lawyers on both sides will most likely be paid by the State as this takes shape--kind of---oops, my mistake, never mind.  The defendants are the losers--their reputations and image.  The whole thing is pretty lame. Pity!

The lawyers on both sides will most likely be paid by the State as this takes shape--kind of---oops, my mistake, never mind.

Yep government employees screw up and rather than hold them responsible the taxpayer winds up holding the bag.  I guess that’s the way it should be but the responsible parties should lose their jobs.

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

The fact that Blunt and Leingang obtained council before beginning the investigation has been known for a very long time. The claim that this (Bjornson’s new testimony) ends everything is nothing but bologna. The BCSA prosecutors had a very, very weak case. None of the deposed primary people agreed with each other. There was absolutely no evidence that Blunt and Leingang conspired to disseminate confidential information. The claim of “a viable affirmative defense of mistake of law” is nothing but a convenient out for BCSA. This thing has been a travesty. Where do Blunt and Leingang go now to get their reputations back?

These two went snooping around cause some one was disclosing dept salaries (which are public record) by email.

They need to be in another line of work.

So now I wonder if there are any further charges remaining against Mr. Blunt and Mr. Leingang.  I have to wonder if the left side of the blogosphere will demonstrate some integrity and offer an apology to these two men and to those who had the common sense to see this situation for what it was. I doubt it, but I hope the reprehensible behavior will not go un-noticed by the bloggers on the right in North Dakota and else where.

On a side note, nice thing to drop on a Friday, wouldn’t you agree?

C.

Another reason why the Nd. income and property tax rate is so high!

I am a disabled worker. I have experienced a decrease in efficiency at WSI because everyone is watching their back instead of taking care of the needs of the injured workers. The process used to make decisions has become much more important than the final outcome, leaving people to wait for decisions for months while WSI holds a “dog and pony show” to prove they satisfied the lawyers. I hope that Mr. Blunt returns WSI to the condition it was in before certain politicians used the injured workers to try to make points with the voters. What a shameful waste of the assets of the State and the services to injured workers. Some public apologies are due to Mr. Blunt and to the injured workers.

Tim Effertz