University of California Raises Tuition 32%…

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

…students protest, occupying buildings.
Just a couple of months ago, we noted that Barack Obama compared his health care proposals to the current relationship between public and private colleges.

They argue that these private companies can’t fairly compete with the government. And they’d be right if taxpayers were subsidizing this public insurance option. But they won’t be. I’ve insisted that like any private insurance company, the public insurance option would have to be self-sufficient and rely on the premiums it collects. But by avoiding some of the overhead that gets eaten up at private companies by profits and excessive administrative costs and executive salaries, it could provide a good deal for consumers, and would also keep pressure on private insurers to keep their policies affordable and treat their customers better, the same way public colleges and universities provide additional choice and competition to students without in any way inhibiting a vibrant system of private colleges and universities.

Now, University of California Regents have raised tuition costs 32% while at the same time admitting fewer students each year to the UC system. Can you say “rationing”?

Despite raucous student protests at UCLA that poured onto the streets of Westwood, the University of California Board of Regents Thursday approved a 32 percent fee increase that will push UC annual tuition above $10,000 for the first time.
Tuition at the 10 UC campuses will increase by $585 in the spring, then another $1,344 next fall. Along with a $900 registration fee, the hikes will bring annual in-state UC tuition to $10,302, not including campus fees, housing and books.

Can anyone imagine that if the UC Regents were to assume responsibility for every private college in the state as well, that somehow they could somehow both reduce costs and provide a better education to the state’s college students? Or would prices go up and enrollment be restricted at those schools, too?
Welcome to Obamacare, Education Division!
Cross Posted at Proof Positive

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-2819

    A total non sequitur of a response, Dino. I guess your college education didn’t include logic and reasoning.

  • sayanything-2819

    $5,000 Dino? Thirty years ago?

    California State Universities tuition for in state students is $2,500 a semester. So, for a four year education that’s $20,000. Seems to be a fairly realistic increase for over a 30 year period.
    Thirty years ago you could buy a new car for a couple thousand bucks and a house for less than $40,000.

    You ignore the added costs to education of these ridiculous “culture studies” classes that add nothing to the student’s education . The only beneficiaries of them are the chairs of the school and the professors.

    I am more concerned about the lowering of the education than I am the raising of costs.

  • AKA WOOF

    The California Regents get out the vote initiative.

  • sayanything-795

    Funny how the left NEVER has anything to say about BigEdu, and how the cost of a college education has way outpaced the consumer price index. Way outpaced. Hypocrites.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I posted the graphic at Kevin’s link to illustrate just how pathetic Dino’s protestations are.

  • http://www.2828.bz/ Stephen

    Bad Timing to raise tuition fee

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Poor Dino! Had he actually attended any of those classes he paid for 30 years ago, (maybe one in elementary economics), he might have learned that one cannot continually spend more than one makes without going broke, and he would blame the perpetually Democrat controlled legislature for California’s financial mess instead of Prop 13.

  • jimmypop

    a free college education is in the bill of rights!!!!!!!

    on a serious note……. why dont they get fired up and blame the people that caused their state to go under?

  • sayanything-4416

    Sure we do. I always say “tough sh*t” to those who complain about the cost of higher Ed. Back before conservatism stopped making people pay taxes, public higher Ed was affordable. My state university cost me $5000 30 years ago for ALL FOUR YEARS.

    Now I laugh when I hear the boomers bitch about the cost of sending their kids to school. Don’t want to pay taxes? Vote republican? Then screw your kids and their debt from tuition and student loans.

    That’s what you get when no one wants to pay taxes or force the rich to pay more.

    DO ENJOY!

  • sayanything-4416

    You mean the conservatives and other assorted idiots who passed Prop 13?

  • sayanything-4416

    I didn’t attend college in California. Back then, California was even cheaper than where I was, back before the cons got Prop 13 passed.

    You remember what civic life was like 30 years, right Jvette? Back when your husband had cancer and no insurance and your state government paid his medical bills?

    California operates under a system where mob rule can affect policy. That has led to their problems.

  • sayanything-4416

    There are no colleges in the southeast worth attending. The religious ones aren’t even on the intellectual radar.

    More delusion from the cons who think they are in any way, shape or form superior.

  • sayanything-7743

    Proof: I like your analogy comparing the proposed so-called “public option” in health care to the failed public option in Big-ED. To me, if the government-run, tax payer subsidies public universities cannot contain costs and provide a quality, reasonably priced college education to all, why would anyone think a government-run public option would work any better for health care.

  • sayanything-101

    We can’t have educrats and tenured pointy heads starving, can we?(:^(
    http://i39.tinypic.com/34sla9f.jpg

  • spartacus

    So California mom and dads are going to start sending their babies to those conservative universities in the religious south east, in states that Dino wants to nuke? Quite a conundrum, higher quality but less expensive education versus fratricide… getting ones bag cut or wearing a $.50 gas station rubber might be less expensive!

  • sayanything-20134

    Professors at big time colleges have their performance judged more on their research and publications than their teaching skills. Having a professor teach doesn’t mean the quality of the teaching will be better. For an intro class, a TA likely has it more fresh in their memory and isn’t as set in their ways in terms of teaching. They’re often more approachable as well.

    Force Factorx

  • sayanything-7743

    Maybe, instead of jacking tuition rates, the Kalipornia Regents should look at cutting costs. First they need to take a hard look at excessive pay, benefits, and health insurance coverage and retirement packages for professors and administrators. With Kalipornia’s extremely generous retirement benefits for public employees, I am willing to bet, administrators, professors and support staff get ridiculously generous benefits at the expense of the state and students. As with many universities, professors get extremely high salaries and teach very few classes or have few responsibilities. It may be time to pay according to services rendered and to cut excessive benefit packages. It is time selfish, greedy – often liberal – professors and administrators learn to sacrifice.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development