Under Obama, Teacher Unions Slowly Getting Their Claws Into Charter Schools

Charter schools usually outperform even some of the best public schools while simultaneously operating in some of the worst neighborhoods in the nation. They’ve reached that level of performance by, for the most part, avoiding teachers unions. But now the unions have allies in Congress and the White House, and they want their share of the pie even if it means bringing new levels of “strict” regulation to these successful institutions of education.

WASHINGTON – As the Obama administration pushes for more charter schools, a teachers’ union is pushing for a bigger role in them.
It’s a new development for the charter school movement, a small but growing — and controversial — effort to create new, more autonomous public schools, usually in cities where traditional schools have failed.
On Tuesday in New York, the United Federation of Teachers expects to formalize a contract with teachers at Animo South Bronx Charter High School, which is run by Green Dot, a nonprofit group that operates charter schools. Ten other New York charter schools are unionized.
And last week in Chicago, teachers voted to unionize three Chicago International Charter School campuses run by Civitas, a Chicago-based nonprofit organization. …
Charter schools are controversial because critics, including many teachers, think they drain money and talent from traditional schools.
Yet the 1.4 million-member American Federation of Teachers, which represents many charter-school teachers, does not oppose them.
Rather, AFT president Randi Weingarten said the administration’s push for more charter schools must come with stricter regulation.
“You can’t do one without the other,” Weingarten said.
Duncan struck the same tone Monday, saying that only high-quality charters should be allowed to operate.
“The charter movement is putting itself at risk by allowing too many second-rate and third-rate schools to exist,” Duncan said. “Your goal should be quality, not quantity.”

So, I wonder which charter schools will be deemed “second-rate” or “third-rate” and tis no longer allowed to operate? If the Obama administration’s handling of car dealership closings is any indication, those not run by Obama’s allies will be the ones targeted.
In this instance, those charter schools who don’t bow down to union demands. I have no doubt that Obama fully intends to do not what’s best for the students in these schools but rather what’s best for his political supporters in the teachers unions.
It’s Obama’s country. The rest of us are just living in it.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array jimmypop

    “The charter movement is putting itself at risk by allowing too many second-rate and third-rate schools to exist,” Duncan said. “Your goal should be quality, not quantity.”

    if he starts closing OTHER (ie public) schools for sucking too much, this could be very good.

  • gustave776

    The teachers vote for the Union, dumb-fuck. The Union is not imposed on them. No one walks into the school and says “you are now Union”. They want to be Unionized, who wouldn’t?

    Buzz, you are a social reject. The government will impose mandates on schools receiving federal monies earmarked for organizing labor. Not all teachers want to be unionized, some teachers cannot bring themselves to support an organization that lobbies in Washington for abortions and lobbies for our children to be taken to the Dr. for procedures w/o notifying the parents. Some teachers want to recognized for their excellence through merit not seniority. Some teachers need to be persuaded to re-educate for a new career and given the opportunity to do so by getting fired for being non productive. You should educate yourself before you decide to embarrass yourself in this media forum. But you have a reputation of being not one of the sharper knives in the drawer.

  • djer

    I should have included the link to the report. Here it is:
    http://credo.stanford.edu/reports/MULTIPLE_CHOICE_CREDO.pdf

    There report, showed very mixed results on charter schools, at best and is the most involved study to date on the charter school experience.

    What is important here is what is good for kids and fair to teachers should be the priority in education.

  • gustave776

    Buzz you are confused……
    Being non-union does not make Teachers moronic. Labeling all non-union teacher as being morons, is moronic. These unions have been extorting money from the teachers since they became unionized. The union holds a carrot out in front of them like offering funding for litigation and offering help to teachers who cannot be a productive educator any more in the classroom. This is actually counter productive for a proper learning environment. Teachers need to be rewarded for excellence not for incompetence. Point of interest is when North Dakota’s 2008′s “Teacher of the Year” (not a union member) was humiliated at the NDEA conference when she tried to attend to receive her award. This was a stellar move on the part of the union to prove who is being moronic. You have no business even commenting this subject because of your lack of intel on the subject.

  • Buzz

    The teachers vote for the Union, dumb-fuck. The Union is not imposed on them. No one walks into the school and says “you are now Union”. They want to be Unionized, who wouldn’t?

  • Craig

    As we see time and time again, what’s good for the union and the employees is usually the opposite of what’s good for society (GM, anyone?). So your point makes no sense, Buzz.

  • djer

    These were all secret ballot elections with union busting firms used in Chicago. And it was the teachers who contacted the union to join not the other way around.

    Stanford just came out with a new report on charter schools. Perhaps Rob, you should read it.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    The teachers vote for the Union, dumb-fuck. The Union is not imposed on them. No one walks into the school and says “you are now Union”. They want to be Unionized, who wouldn’t?

    The unions have been in the public schools for decades. And most states require being a union member in a union shop. No one “votes” to be in a union.

    Union AND logic fail.

  • JimH

    The teachers vote for the Union, dumb-fuck. The Union is not imposed on them. No one walks into the school and says “you are now Union”. They want to be Unionized, who wouldn’t?

    Buz went to a class to learn to say that.

    Vote union or we’ll burn down you school. Nope, no secret balled here. We have to know who voted anti union so we can harass them at home, tell the hit men where to go. Like that leg where it is bitch, better vote union.

  • Buzz

    Again, only a moron would not want to be in a Union.

  • sayanything-4625

    The teachers vote for the Union, dumb-fuck. The Union is not imposed on them. No one walks into the school and says “you are now Union”.

    No they just do things like require insurance and the only affordable insurance policy is through the union.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development