UN Elects Human Rights Abusers To Human Rights Council

Talk about letting the lunatics run the asylum…

UNITED NATIONS (AFP) – The UN General Assembly elected Cuba, China and Saudi Arabia to the new Human Rights Council, putting notorious abusers on a panel created to replace its discredited predecessor.
US Ambassador John Bolton derided the inclusion of Cuba to the council and said it proved that Washington’s concerns about the new panel, which it voted against, were justified.
“What a joy,” Bolton said sarcastically of Havana’s election. “That simply says that the deficiencies from the previous commission may well now still be carried over, as we sadly predicted when we voted against this resolution.”
The United States long criticized the previous commission, saying it was ineffective and loaded with abusers such as China, Cuba, Sudan and Zimbabwe.
The United States was among four countries that voted in March against the revamped council, on the grounds that it would be too easy for human rights violators to be elected.
Cuba, for its part, hailed its election to the Human Rights Council as a “resounding victory” for the communist regime and a “defeat” for the United States.

The UN Human Rights Council is supposed to be about promoting human rights in the world. Yet who winds up sitting on the council? Countries where basic human rights like free speech, free practice of religion, free association and political dissent are routinely oppressed.
And yet some wonder why the validity of the modern United Nations is questioned.
Personally, I don’t think America should abandon the UN, but when a country like Cuba is tasked with promoting human rights in the world even after the UN has supposedly reformed its human rights bureaucracy something has clearly gone terribly, terribly wrong.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://history-nerd.blogspot.com/ Daniel

    now if they were ex-human rights abusers, it would be perfect… like companies hiring "reformed" hackers to protect their networks.  but as is, it’s like hiring somebody who has publically stated that they want to hack your computer to protect your computer.  which is pretty stupid.

  • ellinas

    US Ambassador John Bolton derided the inclusion of Cuba to the council and said it proved that Washington’s concerns about the new panel, which it voted against, were justified

    Where is Mr Bolton’s derision and indignation for China and Saudi Arabia? Why only Cuba?

     

  • http://spaces.msn.com/womulus wom

    I like the fact Saudi Arabia was elected. It has a country that has made great leaps in the human rights area of society. The Government has raised raised awareness on physical abuse in general through targeted campaigns. It has also initiated organizations to aid in that effort.

    There’s some horrible bias in the global media these days and people are just not getting the full story.

  • Friend of USA

    If one day president Bush began telling everybody; " I am Abraham Lincoln and my wife is Mary Todd Lincoln, I freed the slaves, where is my hat?"  and kept saying that non-stop, after a while we would have to remove him and maybe even put him in the crazy house, right?

    Well what Kofi Hannan and most people at the UN are saying and doing  – or what they are NOT doing like say stop a few genocides – is no less crazy.

    Then why the F***K don’t we remove Kofi Hannan and most people at the UN and put them in the crazy house??? 

    China has put dozens of bloggers in jail for posting their opinion on line!!! Cuba has put journalists in jail!!!And Kofi is happy with China and Cuba sitting at the table on human rights???!!!

    Crazy alert! Crazy alert! 

  • Bat One

    Is there anything, anything at all, that the UN does with even a modicum of of competence or integrity?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development