Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, August 29, 2006


Too Much Money?

Opinion Journal

"New Orleans has suffered from the trauma of three crises," says Louisiana Congressman Bobby Jindal. "First was the hurricane, second was the levees breaking and third has been the widespread incompetence of the federal, state and local government response. This has been a one-year case study in bureaucracy and red tape at its very worst."

Turned its back? As the chart nearby indicates, Congress has approved $122.5 billion for the Gulf Region, a figure incomprehensible in size to anyone but, well, a politician. The real wonder is that anyone is surprised, much less feigning surprise, that things are going poorly.

New Orleans' plight is not the result of federal underspending. Uncle Sam has spent some five times more on Katrina relief than any other natural disaster in the past 50 years. Both parties in Congress and the White House opted for the status quo by relying on federal bureaucracies to oversee the rebuilding effort. If Uncle Sam were deliberately trying to waste these funds, it is hard to imagine a better way than to funnel the money through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Small Business Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Both HUD and the SBA have been on the chopping block back to the early Reagan years.

Coastal Mississippi is well on the way to full recovery, thanks in part to the leadership of Governor Haley Barbour. The number of building permits in Mississippi are four times higher than in New Orleans.


Back in October I extrapolated the funding that Grand Forks received after the 1997 flood to the Katrina disaster. By my rough figuring Louisiana and Mississippi needed $88 Billion to equal the support of Grand Forks. According to Opinion Journal $122 Billion. Reportedly the money spent in New Orleans hasn't really helped those that need it most. Are we to believe that if we throw more money at the problem they'll do any better?

Back in my October post I asked this question to our Senator, Kent Conrad:

So my question is Senator, "Did Grand Forks get short changed by your efforts in 1997 or are you going to stop this looting of the treasury."


Louisiana politicians aren't satisfied with the generosity they've seen from the rest of the country. Rather, they are demanding another $250 Billion. It's time for them to go to work, not to wait for more money.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for likwidshoe

Just remember that there are some out there who want to give control of our health care to these guys.

likwidshoe on August 29, 2006 at 06:47 pm
Avatar for KatrinaCoverageDotCom

There was a lot of “multilevel contracting” involved where each level took a cut and with an inflated price charged to the government. Only part of that can be blamed on simple incompetence, with the rest due to companies being “connected”. Most of them were connected to the GOP, but not all.

KatrinaCoverageDotCom on August 29, 2006 at 08:24 pm
Avatar for Pilgrim

Testing to see if this post will go through. Having some problems.

Pilgrim on August 30, 2006 at 06:00 am
Avatar for Pilgrim

Okay, trying again.

You’re right. The money’s there and plenty of it. Its our politicians here in Louisiana that are the problem, not the Feds. The best case scenario is sheer butt-stupid incompetence on the part of our local politicians when it comes to creating effective distribution programs for that money. Mississippi, who got hit as hard as we did minus the broken levees, did it. why can’t we?

The worst case scenario is old fashined, dishonest political patronage in the finest tradition of Louisiana politics.

Pilgrim on August 30, 2006 at 06:04 am
Avatar for Pilgrim

Furthermore (I’m on a roll here) with this track record of incomptetence its no wonder the people in Washington who hold the purse strings are wary of Louisiana.

Our elected cockroaches are an embarrasment to all of us, from our governor Kathleen “Babbling” Blanco, to Mayor Ray “Chocolate City” Nagin. The people of New Orleans are deserving eveything they get for re-electing that clown.

Pilgrim on August 30, 2006 at 06:10 am
Avatar for madmatt

Grand Forks is smaller in size and population, most of what was lost was fields which are much cheaper to replace…also in 98 competent people were running FEMA not so when Katrina hit!

madmatt on August 30, 2006 at 09:13 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Grand Forks is smaller in size and population,

We received about $500 million.  I extrapolated that over the populations of Louisiana and Mississippi. 

most of what was lost was fields which are much cheaper to replace

Turns out the fields were fine.  They didn’t need to be replaced.  Nor was that in my figures.

...also in 98 competent people were running FEMA not so when Katrina hit!

It was ‘97.  FEMA didn’t do a thing until the cleanup phase.  We didn’t wait around to start the cleanup.

Pretty much wrong in all points MadMatt.

The Whistler on August 30, 2006 at 09:18 am
Avatar for Punditguy

We have every right to demand that the money be spent wisely, and we should audit to find out where the money has been spent. I have to say, though, we should be equally diligent about the billions spent on Iraq reconstruction.

Punditguy on August 30, 2006 at 09:18 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Amen.

And after the audit, trials.

The Whistler on August 30, 2006 at 09:21 am
Avatar for carsick

I’d venture to guess that Grand Forks’ primary industry was not tourist centered and able to get back up and running as soon as they could get temporary offices with electricity and phones. Therefore those that worked before were able to quickly collect paychecks and businesses were able to avoid major bankruptcy.
I’d also venture to guess that they didn’t have to build massive and complicated levees to hold back water immediately. Though they did build probably more than 20 miles of levees, most were probably of the traditional earthen variety and they were designed and built in a timeline to beat the next potential flood season and not needed immediately only to be rebuilt after things dried out.
I’d also assume that knowing from the months of snowfall preceding the flood that many expert and business strategies were constructed and put in place for dealing with the widely predicted coming flood.  New Orleans, despite having theoretical preparation really only had less than 80 hours notice.

carsick on August 30, 2006 at 10:19 am
Avatar for The Whistler

New Orleans, despite having theoretical preparation really only had less than 80 hours notice.

Duh, if I lived in a city below sea level in hurricane country I’d damn well be ready.  If I was in city and state emergency management I’d review the plan before every hurricane season.

I’d also assume that knowing from the months of snowfall preceding the flood that many expert and business strategies were constructed and put in place for dealing with the widely predicted coming flood.

Not quite so simple.  The National Weather services predicted a 49 foot crest.  That’s right at the dangerous level.  So of course we gave ourselves 3 feet just in case.

However the flood reached 54 feet.  The National Weather service only revised their 49 foot crest on April 15th.  The poop hit the fan a day or two after that.

The Whistler on August 30, 2006 at 10:32 am
Avatar for carsick

Not to mention that Grand Forks neighboring towns and cities were able to offer more immediate help because they were not dealing with crippling hurricane-level wind and flooding damage themselves.

carsick on August 30, 2006 at 10:32 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Not to mention that Grand Forks neighboring towns and cities were able to offer more immediate help because they were not dealing with crippling hurricane-level wind and flooding damage themselves.

So we still wouldn’t have been sitting in the water waiting for the government to tell us to feed us.

The Whistler on August 30, 2006 at 10:37 am
Avatar for carsick

Not quite so simple. The National Weather services predicted a 49 foot crest. That’s right at the dangerous level. So of course we gave ourselves 3 feet just in case.

However the flood reached 54 feet. The National Weather service only revised their 49 foot crest on April 15th. The poop hit the fan a day or two after that.

You’re discounting the fact that they knew a bullet had been fired months before and the only question was “will we dodge it or not”.  Grand Forks had theoretical planning too but they also had time to prepare real-time planning in case they didn’t dodge the bullet.

carsick on August 30, 2006 at 10:43 am
Avatar for carsick

“Our saving grace was that the federal government came in with a large grant for the city … these moneys were used to help with flood recovery and to purchase numerous homes along the route of the new levee, as well as homes on the wet side of the levee,” said Mark Walker, Grand Forks’ assistant city engineer. “We had a pretty strong congressional delegation. That was helpful in securing the funding and the commitment for building the permanent flood protection system.”

carsick on August 30, 2006 at 10:48 am
Avatar for likwidshoe

carsick said, ...they were not dealing with crippling hurricane-level wind and flooding damage themselves.

New Orleans largely dodged the “hurricane-level wind” bullet. Check out the buildings. They’re mostly still there.

The “hurricane-level wind” mainly affected the coast of Mississippi. Everything was wiped out there.

A year later, NO is still bitching and acting like it is blameless for the welfare show we all witnessed and Mississippi is quietly rebuilding.

likwidshoe on August 30, 2006 at 11:03 am
Avatar for carsick

Likwidshoe
If you reread my post you will see that I was referring to the neighboring towns and cities.
I think “neighboring towns and cities” would include those on the Mississippi coast.  You may not agree.

carsick on August 30, 2006 at 11:11 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.