Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Tom Delay - On Fiscal Responsibility

In the last 5 weeks, I have a shrinking appreciation for the Republican party with regards to their "Smaller Government" platform. I have been upset with the recent entitlement growth and wonder where the "small government" Republicans have gone.

Tom Delay, hearing much of the same kind of dissent, has responded with:


Republicans will defend taxpayers - Editorials/Op-Ed - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper
Our positioning on this issue -- as a party that is strongly identified with the American people as sensible and determined protectors of the hard-working taxpayer -- demands a unified and clear opposition to those whose policies and agendas are hostile to the taxpayer's best interests: Capitol Hill Democrats intent on raising taxes, free-spending special interest groups intent on curing the ills of society by advocating federal dollars as the only solution and a bevy of bureaucrats more interested in an expansion of federal programs than the reduction of ineffective ones.
While tailoring our focus on the task at hand, our party must also trumpet our accomplishments. So far this year, the House-passed appropriations bills have cut 98 low-priority programs, for a savings of $4 billion and the first real cut in domestic spending since 1987. And this fall, the House will pass mandatory spending savings of at least $35 billion, to bring next year's spending projections in line with the budget Congress passed this spring -- a budget saving plan that was put in place months before Hurricane Katrina brought this debate on spending to the forefront.
This year, House Republicans streamlined the Appropriations Committee structure to allow for a more transparent, accountable legislative process for our annual spending bills. This reformed process will make it harder to hide excess spending and easier to save money in the future. Wasteful spending can be found and should be cut -- like the $89 billion that never made it into the $286 billion (formerly $375 billion) highway bill the president signed last month -- and as conservatives and Republicans, we should never let down our guard on this issue.


First he picks on the Democrats, as if they have a lot to do with it, then he identifies a few piddly programs worth $4 Billion, then mentions $89 Billion that was cut from the highway bill...

You missed a few Billion that could have been cut, Tom!

This pork should never have made it in the bill to begin with, nor should the prescription drug bill have been passed.

Cutting taxes is a great idea! Instituting the Fair Tax, an even better idea! Cutting spending on programs that do little more than create new dependencies... another important ideal!

Doing all three.... Watch our economy take off!

Comments

Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

DeLay was in charge of the majority in the Senate.  The House has a Republican majority as well and we have a Republican President.  If DeLay has a problem with pork he has no one to look at other than himself and his fellow party members.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on September 28, 2005 at 09:10 pm
Avatar for LoadTheMule

Right on, Rob.  And my shrinking appreciation for the Republican party with regards to their “Smaller Government” platform goes back a helluva lot farther than 5 weeks.

Regards…

LoadTheMule on September 29, 2005 at 06:10 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

That was a good comment, wasn’t it?  Except that I had DeLay in charge of the Senate.  Really, he’s in charge of the house.

Silly me.  The points still stand though.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on September 29, 2005 at 08:10 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.