Say Anything Blog

Rob lies through his average American teeth again, when attempting to use his averaged American political hack brain.

Only Rob would blame what Conservatives are doing, on Time magazin.

Two months ago, Vanderslice founded a Democratic PAC called the Matthew 25 Network and soon noticed that the negative emails she received from conservative Christians fell into two general categories: abortion, and the assertion that Obama is the Antichrist. The cataloguing of similarities Obama shares with the Antichrist began nearly two years ago. But they picked up steam in February 2008 after he racked up a string of impressive primary victories. A Google search for “Obama” and “Antichrist” turns up more than 700,000 hits, including at least one blog dedicated solely to the topic. A more obscure search for “Obama” and “Nicolae Carpathia” yields a surprising 200,000 references.

It’s not hard to see how some Obama-haters might be tempted to make the comparison. In the Left Behind books, Carpathia is a junior senator who speaks several languages, is beloved by people around the world and fawned over by a press corps that cannot see his evil nature, and rises to absurd prominence after delivering just one major speech. Hmmh. But serious Antichrist theorists don’t stop there. Everything from Obama’s left-handedness to his positive rhetoric to his appearance on the cover of this magazine has been cited as evidence of his true identity. One chain email claims that the Antichrist was prophesied to be “A man in his 40s of MUSLIM descent,” which would indeed sound ominous if not for the fact that the Book of Revelation was written at least 400 years before the birth of Islam.

The speculation reached a fever pitch after Obama’s European trip and the Berlin speech in which he called for global unity. Conservative Christian author Hal Lindsey declared in an essay on World Net Daily, “Obama is correct in saying that the world is ready for someone like him-a messiah-like figure, charismatic and glib...The Bible calls that leader the Antichrist. And it seems apparent that the world is now ready to make his acquaintance.” The conservative website RedState.com now sells mugs and t-shirts that sport a large “O” with horns and the words “The Anti-Christ” underneath.

So in short, Rob and his co-horts spend their time labeling and calling Obama the Massiah, then when CONSERVATIVE Christians start calling him the anti-christ, he blames it on liberals.

What a fucking idiot Rob is.

Does anyone else have the raisins to admit Rob is lying here?

You’re the liar, H idiot.  That’s all you do.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

It’s rob’s most endearing quality.
How can you not love pure hackery?

“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

Robert,

Do you agree that it is Time magazine calling Obama the anti-christ and not the Christian Conservatives?

Are you calling the Times liars?  Yes or no?

What a fucking idiot Rob is.

The first post out of the retarded troll’s mouth, who never attacks unless attacked first.
Not “I disagree.”, not “you might be mistaken”, but “What a fucking idiot Rob is.”
This is what passes for intelligence in the kiddie pool of Gidget the Midget!
( And pure RPDS! )

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

How can you not love pure hackery?

That would explain your self esteem, boob!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

It’s what you call anger and retaliation Poof.  Because Rob will never admit he is lying or made a mistake.  This is pure hackery.

This is not worthy of respect nor is it American.  This is the type of tricks we expect from our enemies like the former USSR and China.

Do you agree that it is Time magazine calling Obama the anti-christ and not the Christian Conservatives?

Time magazine is obviously making a false accusation, in its zeal to smear Republicans and Christians.
The reality is that Obama is selling himself as a Christlike figure, with his promises to “redeem” America.  He opened up the subject, and is now being smacked with the truth.
You get repeatedly smacked with the truth here, as you should be.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

It’s what you call anger and retaliation

Yes. Hitting him “back” before he hits you first! Spoken like a true six year old!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Robert cries:

Time magazine is obviously making a false accusation, in its zeal to smear Republicans and Christians.

Of course Robert, a conspiracy theory.  You are clearly a rational thinker.

Poof,

Defend the charge, if you can.

Of course Robert, a conspiracy theory. You are clearly a rational thinker.

I alleged no conspiracy, idiot; I reported a policy.
I’m a rational thinker and observer, you obviously are not.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

Proof,

Beat me to it!  Again, the very first comment from the young “progressive” hack is to attack Rob rather than address the substance of the post.

H,

So-o-o-o… had a ride on a Sturgis yet?  To be fair, I had considered crediting you with some modicum of bravado for showing up here after making such an abysmal fool of yourself self-righteously comparing riding the waves with riding a Sturgis.  But then I realized you’re simply to blissfully unaware to be properly embarrassed by your own behavior.

“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Robert,

Hey genius, reporting what you call a policy IS as conspiracy theory.  Unless you can prove Time magazine has a “policy” to make conservative christians look bad, you are talking conspiracy.

Think clearly my friend.

Bat,

Nice attempt to distract from Rob’s hackery.  But nevertheless, why would I be ashamed of mis-reading a word.  It happens.

Surely the incredible fear of embarrassment you demonstrate must be what prevents you idiots from admitting your and your friends errors.

You call that a sign of maturity?

Hey genius, reporting what you call a policy IS as conspiracy theory. Unless you can prove Time magazine has a “policy” to make conservative
christians look bad, you are talking conspiracy.

Wrong again, idiot!  It has been the policy of Time magazine for some years to advocate for the leftie version of reality, and is no secret, which is the key element to a “conspiracy”.  Sorry you don’t know that.
Now, you can make up any definitions you want, but that doesn’t make them true or relevant.  As usual, you are nattering off on irrelevancies here.  I know you have nothing else.
Obama has promised to “redeem” America, and he is falsely presenting himself as our redeemer.  You are unable to address that fact, I see.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

When Obama presents his message and person in terms that a liberal journalist first called him a ‘Messiah” image, when women faint at his rallies, when he talks in terms of his being able to save the world from poverty and rescue America from its evil image, then the Left has little room to complain when that image begins to stick and takes on a life of its own.

McCain’s staff have taken note of the Messiah Obama image and being aware of how many people follow him to almost the point of personality worship, they have created a very inventive and amusing campaign advertisement and the Left hates their Messiah being exposed to such sacreligious humor.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Defend the charge, if you can.

That you’re not a petulant six year old with a potty mouth and RPDS? I couldn’t defend that if my life depended on it!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

It has been the policy of Time magazine for some years to advocate for the leftie version of reality, and is no secret, which is the key element to a “conspiracy”.

Everybody knows that 9/11 truthers think it was caused by the US and Bush, but that doesn’t prevent it from being a conspiracy.

Your mind is all twisted up like a pretzel.  There is a pretzel in your head.

Poof,

I admire your maturity level and calm cool collect way you defend Rob for his lies.  It sort of makes proves my point.

Everybody knows that 9/11 truthers think it was caused by the US and Bush, but that doesn’t prevent it from being a conspiracy.

This has nothing whatsoever to do with Time magazine having a pro-Dem editorial policy.  It is you with the pretzel “logic”, idiot.

How much farther off the point will you go before you run out of lying bullshit?

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

Hannitized:
Your calling Rob a liar on almost a daily basis does not make it the truth.

For any such accusation to have any credibility, you would need objective, documentary evidence that Rob would have to possess evidence that something he was going to say was false, but he said it anyway. A difference of opinion or his expressing his interpretation of events/facts does not constitute a lie.

Before you make this charge again, IMO, I believe you need to make sure what Rob has said clearly meets the definition of a lie, which accusation you can support; or you need, if you are to be taken seriously, to employ more moderate terms to express your disagreement with his points of view.

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

It sort of makes proves my point.

Yeah! Like the way you sort of “makes proves” your point everywhere else you’ve had your ass handed to you and you’ve run away to hide?

When a liar like you calls Rob a liar, I consider the source. If you Google mind-numbingly stupid and mind-numbingly dishonest, you’ll find Hannitized the troll! (You’re currently #3 & 4)

Why don’t you go “make prove” yourself in traffic, little Kahuna?

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

You have GOT to be kidding. 

The whole country is laughing at the left-wing hysteria over stupid stuff. 

Oprah told us Obama was “The ONE.”

I guess she really meant “Antichrist,” right? 

I swear to God, this frantic gobbledegook from the left-wing blogs will COST Obama the election. 

Amazing how his supporters run people AWAY from voting for him. 

Sheesh

Everybody knows

“If a conservative is still a republican after the last 13 years, he is blind to the fact that his party of choice has failed him utterly.” – Realitybasedbob

“It’s not easy to make the infamous Willie Horton ad from the 1988 presidential campaign seem benign. But suggesting that Barack Obama is the Antichrist might just do it.”

Rob said the folks at time think McCain is calling Obama the antichrist.  This is correct given the context and tone of the entire article.  Rob’s inference is more easily drawn than the inference that McCain is calling Obama the antichrist. 

Bottom line both inferences are just that. There is nothing dishonest about what Rob and many readers infer from this time article. 

Get a clue H.

Accusations and allegations are just that.  Guesses and mostly false until proven.
In this case, a magazine that lost its credibility over thirty years ago is now trying to hold on with false accusations.  All this takes away from any discussion of substance in the upcoming general election.  That, in my opinion is the left’s MO, hysteria, emotions and gossip based upon nothing.  I was glad to see that Edwards at least said that he lied about his affair.  Today.  Maybe Time will report that fact correctly.

Communism is evil

I am having a lot of trouble trying to figure out why Hannitized thinks Rob is ‘lying’ here, or being a ‘hack’.

Time reports that they think McCain is accusing Obama of being the antichrist.

They are not charging that conservatives think Obama is the antichrist, but that McCain himself is making that accusation.

It is a patently ridiculous charge, and Rob scoffs at it.

How in the hell does that make Rob a liar or a hack?

Hannitized, you need to stop reflexively calling other people liars when they say something you disagree with.

This is making you look like a lunatic.

They are not charging that conservatives think Obama is the antichrist, but that McCain himself is making that accusation.

I meant to say that Rob is not addressing the accusation that conservatives are calling Obama the antichrist.

This is making you look like a lunatic.

Asking H to stop behaving like a lunatic is to ask him to behave like a normal, rational human being.  It just isn’t going to happen Ken.

If it is The Truth, it should be discussed.  Dukakas released a killer.  He killed again and again.  One state finally arrested him and tried him there because to send him back to that liberal state would have put all of us at risk yet again.

Communism is evil

Hannitized, you make me tired. Go DO something!

Schoo! Schoo!

This has nothing whatsoever to do with Time magazine having a pro-Dem editorial policy.

Where is the proof of the policy Robert?  Or are you just giving us more of that right-wing conspiracy theory nut stories again?

Time reports that they think McCain is accusing Obama of being the antichrist.

No Ken.  That is NOT what Time is reporting.  Time is reporting that CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES think that is what McCain’s ad is saying.

Didn’t you even read the story?  Did you miss my cut and paste? 

I swear, you guys are nuts.

Comparitive study using cut and paste:

Rob’s title: Time Magazine Accuses McCain Of Calling Obama The Anti-Christ

Time Magazine title: An Antichrist Obama in McCain Ad?

H’s take: Rob lies through his average American teeth again [...] What a fucking idiot Rob is.

(Which is he H: an idiot or a liar?  You can’t even settle on which juvenile insult to use.)

If you needed evidence that lefties like H are just plain stoopid, this is as much as you should have required.  And that idiot occasionally tries to give us reading lessons!

There ain’t nuttin’ to debate here.  H is just full of shit as usual.

LMAO.

And that idiot occasionally tries to give us reading lessons!

Carrick: If you think his reading lessons are comical, you should see when he tries to correct my grammar!
Too freaking hilarious!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

My mistake, the Time story reports that Christian Conservatives think Obama is the anti-christ and that some christian Dems think the ad is supporting it.

My argument was about Rob blaming Democrats for creating the Messiah mystique, when it is the conservatives and hacks, like Rob and you guys.

The other argument is that it is actually the christian conservatives who do think he is the anti-christ that fuels this belief.

Instead he’s poking a bit of fun at the cult of personality that has sprung up around Obama.  His followers treat him like a savior.  Oprah herself calls him “the one.”

If that’s not worth of mocking, I don’t know what is.

Yeah, but is Rob and cohorts that actually call him the Messiah.  Sheesh!

I meant to say that Rob is not addressing the accusation that conservatives are calling Obama the antichrist.

No Ken, what you meant to say was that Rob, being the hack that he is ignored it for the sake of making Dems look bad on a story that makes Conservatives look worse.

And you prove my point in the process.

My mistake

My argument was about Rob blah, blah, blah…

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

It’s not easy to make the infamous Willie Horton ad from the 1988 presidential campaign seem benign. But suggesting that Barack Obama is the Antichrist might just do it.

That’s just what some outraged Christian supporters of the Democratic nominee are claiming John McCain’s campaign did in an ad called “The One” that was recently released online.  [...]

These are the opening paragraphs.  Hard to see how H could have missed that.
H:

My argument was about Rob blaming Democrats for creating the Messiah mystique

But Rob never said that.  I count seven sentences in Rob’s post.  None of them addressed this, so you’re just full of shit as usual.

You made up an alternative interpretation of the Times Magazine article, you misconstrued the point of Rob’s post, you flatly stated that Times Magazine didn’t say something that it clearly did, etc.

That’s pretty quick work, even for a dishonest hack like yourself.  Why you expected to get away from it is the only part I’m not sure.

BTW, Please tell me how “My mistake” turns into “What a fucking idiot Rob is”?

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Rob said the folks at time think McCain is calling Obama the antichrist.  This is correct given the context and tone of the entire article.  Rob’s inference is more easily drawn than the inference that McCain is calling Obama the antichrist.

Bottom line both inferences are just that. There is nothing dishonest about what Rob and many readers infer from this time article.

BTW, Please tell me how “My mistake” turns into “What a fucking idiot Rob is”?

Robs conclusion is that the Times is “embarrassed” and reacting over dems supposedly treating Obama like a Messiah, when it is in fact the Republicans who crafted that image. (see below)

If anything, I think the folks at Time are reacting more to their own embarrassment at being called out for treating Obama like a messiah than anything else.

Further, he ignored the fact that the article talked about Christian CONSERVATIVES who actually believe he is the anti-christ.

For Rob to post the conclusion he did shows his dishonesty.

My argument was about Rob blaming Democrats for creating the Messiah mystique - Me

But Rob never said that.  I count seven sentences in Rob’s post.  None of them addressed this, so you’re just full of shit as usual. - YOU

Um,....yes he did. (see below)

If anything, I think the folks at Time are reacting more to their own embarrassment at being called out for treating Obama like a messiah than anything else. - Rob Port

What say you now Carrick?

crickets?

Interesting, the original commenter posted a long and interesting argument that, if true, shows us there’s a serious far right movement to prove Obama is the anti-christ.  Given general Republican (and sometimes Democrat) ad tactics, it’s not exactly a stretch to assume the McCain campaign would try to play up to this in a vague enough fashion to where they can’t be specifically called on it.

A litany of people then call him an idiot and reel off a number of mindless partisan slurs, then transition into some BS logic where a presidential candidate who promises change and hope (isn’t that like all of them?) is painting himself as the messiah… apparently one responsible for the “wack” behavior of some of his followers.

And still, not one actual post responding to the original points (which are quite debatable, but interesting).  Seriously, are we waiting for Fox News to provide specific talking points to regurgitate or can anyone think for themselves?

the original commenter posted a long and interesting argument that, if true…

The “original commenter” is a known liar.

A litany of people then call him an idiot

If this troll had a point, he’s free to present it without insult and vitriol and maybe he gets a hearing. When he comes in, insulting people and craps all over every one and throws bombs, why should we take either him or his argument seriously?

This troll has said often in the past, that he “only attacks when he is attacked first”. This, too, is a lie. Invariably, you see this liar’s first post on any thread full of insults where no one has provoked him.
He is mind-numbingly dishonest or mind-numbingly stupid or both! (I vote for “both")

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

The anti christ would vote for Obama.

I am just guessing, but methinks Hannitized just hates Rob and nothing will ever change his mind or his brand of attacks against him!

No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Very smart guess, Neiman, where Hannitized is concerned.

When H first arrived here, he was a decent - albeit - liberal debater.  Then, in the Spring, he and Rob really got into it on one thread, and H has been obsessed with putting Rob in his place ever since.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

“As a conservative, I will not be overly enthusiastic about voting for John McCain on November 4 - but I will be sprinting to the polling place to do so!”
Matthew May, conservative commentator, The American Spectator

Be that as it may, he’s the only who posted an actual argument before resorting to childish insults and general platitudes designed to skirt the issue.  The fact every single dissident refuses to address the EVIDENCE OF CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES PAINTING OBAMA AS THE ANTI-CHRIST simply leads me to believe they have no convincing response disputing his point… and therefore prefer to focus on character instead of the issue itself.  I’m interested in the issue at hand and evidence for both sides of the argument, not past posts where someone was wrong.

A metaphor if you will:

Intellectual Conservative - Obama’s energy plan is unrealistic and ineffective because…

Mindless partisan sheep - *brandishes tire gauge* Paris Hilton is smarter than Obama, also I heard he was influenced by pinko mentors!

I am just guessing, but methinks Hannitized just hates Rob

With a heaping helping of envy. Rob is a respected blogger with a very large soapbox to stand on and Hannitized is a very small minded individual who can’t stand the fact that his views and opinions can’t get the same traction as Rob’s!

The sad thing is, that even the trolls that come here have just as big a forum as Rob if they just come here and reasonably make their case. Hannitized can’t deal with the fact that he can’t get away with lies and bluster here because people call him on his immaturity and dishonesty!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

he’s the only who posted an actual argument before resorting to childish insults

Are you Hannitized’s mother or his sock puppet? His FIRST POST contained childish insults. He resorted to childish insults his FIRST POST.. Are you incapable or reading and understanding English?
I call bullshit on your defense of Hannitized!
Your first defense of him had a strange aroma about it. This one definitely reeks!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Hannitized, it is pretty clear that you are the one who didn’t read the article.

It’s not easy to make the infamous Willie Horton ad from the 1988 presidential campaign seem benign. But suggesting that Barack Obama is the Antichrist might just do it.

That’s just what some outraged Christian supporters of the Democratic nominee are claiming John McCain’s campaign did in an ad called “The One” that was recently released online.

I don’t know how this could be any clearer. Democrats, according to Time, are accusing McCain of running an ad calling Obama the antichrist.

No ifs, ands or buts.

Rob called them on this ridiculous assertion, and there is no ‘lie’ involved.

Case closed.

When H first arrived here, he was a decent - albeit - liberal debater.

I beg to differ; he started with nonsense, profanity and insults, and hasn’t changed course since.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

You can beg to differ all you want… it’s nothing more than your opinion.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

“As a conservative, I will not be overly enthusiastic about voting for John McCain on November 4 - but I will be sprinting to the polling place to do so!”
Matthew May, conservative commentator, The American Spectator

You can beg to differ all you want… it’s nothing more than your opinion.

Thanks for sharing your opinion.  If you want to actually check, you’ll find out I’m right, if you are honest enough to do that.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

You have your opinion. 

I have mine.

End of discussion.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

“As a conservative, I will not be overly enthusiastic about voting for John McCain on November 4 - but I will be sprinting to the polling place to do so!”
Matthew May, conservative commentator, The American Spectator

End of discussion.

No. The facts are on my side.  If you want to give up and run away, feel free to do so.  You get H’s first comment, and you will see I’m right.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

He is the A-Christ!!

Are you Hannitized’s mother or his sock puppet? His FIRST POST contained childish insults. He resorted to childish insults his FIRST POST.. Are you incapable or reading and understanding English?

Apparently you’re the one with the learning disability.  I’ll go ahead and drop this to a 7th grade reading level… he’s the only one who had an argument IN ADDITION to childish insults.  Your posts are NOTHING BUT childish insults.  It’s RIDICULOUSLY OBVIOUS the post is in no way sympathetic to Hannitized… merely pointing out that this is an obvious case of pot calling the kettle black when it comes to childish behavior.

Seriously, is there anyone who can discuss this without becoming terrified of having no cut and paste talking points?  It’s important to keep an eye on the radical elements of both parties, not enable them while acting like a retarded child.

I’ll go ahead and drop this to a 7th grade reading level…

I’ll drop it to a second grade level so YOU can understand:

Rob lies…

The SECOND WORD of his first post, Decider! From start to finish, this troll comes here, spreads lies, hijacks threads and calls people names without provocation. You can defend this foul mouthed, dishonest troll if you like, but I’ve had far too much experience with him to give him the benefit of the doubt!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Because Rob will never admit he is lying or made a mistake.  This is pure hackery.

Here he accuses Rob of the very things he is guilty of! He has never admitted making a mistake on this thread for example, where he said some incredibly stupid things and then just disappeared. Not that I blame him! His position was indefensible from the beginning, he just too dumb to realize it!
He’s a dishonest hack and a liar and his projection would light up a multi-plex!

Maybe if he lied to you and about you and called you names for eight or ten months, you’d tire of him, too!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof: Consider this: “Hannitized” is a leftie troll who is trying to cash in on Sean Hannity’s term, and “The Decider” is trying to cash in on President Bush’s term.
See any resemblance?  Probably sockpuppets for each other.
Lefties need to create phony multiple identities to create the illusion that someone agrees with their bullshit.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

Interesting, the original commenter posted a long and interesting argument that, if true, shows us there’s a serious far right movement to prove Obama is the anti-christ.

You mean he cut and pasted part of the magazine article that Rob linked to!

serious far right movement

Oh, puh-leease! Hal Lindsay hasn’t been relevant in Christian circles since the seventies! He authored The Late Great Planet Planet Earth From wiki:

Lindsey originally suggested the possibility that these climactic events might play out in the 1980s, which he interpreted as one generation from the foundation of modern Israel in 1948, a pivotal event in most evangelical (especially conservative evangelical) schools of eschatological thought. Cover art on the Bantam edition boldly suggested that the 1970s were the “era of the Antichrist as foretold by Moses and Jesus,” and called the book “a penetrating look at incredible ancient prophecies involving this generation.”

Perhaps his credentials would impress a Time reporter (or Hannitized) but a “serious far right movement”? I don’t think so!

BTW, Hitler was speculated to be the anti-Christ, along with any number of Popes. I doubt that there’s a serious Biblical scholar anywhere that would speculate that the bumbling boob O’blurry is the anti-Christ.

But, thanks for playing!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

See any resemblance?

They could just be fellow travelers.

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

The Late Great Planet Planet Earth

The extra “planet” is for Hannitized! Heh.

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof: Then there’s the ignorant labeling of anyone who isn’t a Marxist as “far-right”, just like Joe Stalin did after Hitler broke their little alliance.
While a military dictatorship might qualify as “far-right”, and a theocracy might qualify as “far-right”, there are no politically significant groups in this country who support either of those two positions.  However, we do have a lot of far-lefties who want to turn this into a one-Party country with govt confiscation of all business income.  They’re the real menace today.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

They could just be fellow travelers.

Only one leftarded brain between them.

Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

Only Rob would blame what Conservatives are doing, on Time magazin.

The Article is titled “Time Magazine accuses McCain of calling Obama the antiChrist”. The Time article linked to is “An Antichrist Obama in McCain ad.”

So Time did exactly what Rob said. Where’s the lie? Rob never said TIME called Obama the antiChrist. And McCain is certainly not calling Obama the anti-Christ, so the lie is yours. As usual.

Obama/Biden is not change. It’s more of the same.

Ken,

You are as dishonest as Rob.  You know damned well that the title in the Time magazine article is a QUESTION, not a statement.

The Article is titled “Time Magazine accuses McCain of calling Obama the antiChrist”. The Time article linked to is “An Antichrist Obama in McCain ad.”

You deliberately left off the question mark in your argument as well.

So Time did exactly what Rob said. Where’s the lie?

Not exactly, Time asked a question and then presented data to allow the reader to make their own decision.  Rob intentionally left out the condemning elements that reflect poorly on Christian Conservatives.

Rob does this on just about every single post he creates.  It is so tiring and annoying.  I only attack Rob because he is so damned consistent in his hackery that it comes off as nothing more than bullshit.

I would respect Rob if he could once admit he was wrong or post a half way honest post, but he never will and he always sees things through his political hack blinders.  Rob is a propagandist pure and simple.  I hate that.  Sue me.

Rob never said TIME called Obama the antiChrist.

I never said he did.  Rob lied about the fact that he said Time “accuses” McCain of calling Obama an antichrist, and they didn’t.  THE CONSERVATIVES DID.

I just can’t believe you miss that much Ken.

And for clarity, when I say the conservatives did, i mean that they called Obama the antichrist. 

Time never “accused” McCain of calling Obama the antichrist.  THAT IS A LIE!!

Decider,

Thanks for noticing the argument and also my childishness.  Your point wouldn’t be as valid if you didn’t recognize both.

I can do what my opponents can’t.  I can admit when I am wrong.  I do name call on occasion and it is childish.  Nobody on the other side is man enough to admit that, or that they do it.

Further, the only reason I do is because when I do try to offer up argument without insults, they just insult me anyway.  This is just the nature of this blog.

Occasionally they can manage a debate with opponents without such childishness, but that is few and far between.

Watch Ken.  He can argue for a time without name-calling, then he breaks down and reduces himself to the level of his peers after a few consecutive arguments.

Where Ken fails is in his blind partisanship. For example he refuses to admit to himself that the TIME magazine article title is a question, not statement.  You have to be either completely dishonest or a liar not to admit that.  If a person still continues to deny that reality, then the only alternative is an unfortunate one.....that they are stupid.

After spending considerable time on this blog, I have two conclusions.  That half the commentors on this site are both dishonest and stupid.

There are (3) talented challengers.  The first is PParets.  He is the only one who can admit an argument and debate reasonable and rationally.  Bat, when he is agreeable can also be, but his enormous ego gets in the way of honest debate and he thinks he is right about everything no matter what.  He rarely concedes a good point, but it can be achieved depending on his mood.  In last place you have a tie between Carrick and Ken.  They both get caught up in their own bullshit and refuse to admit simple facts and logic.  Just test them.

Proof is just a partisan idiot and a Rob worshipper.  He confuses hatred for Robs actions with hatred for what he considers Rob’s success.  It is beyond ridiculous.  You are now getting a healthy dose of his unreasonable debate style and thought process.  He is beyond salvation.

Robert108 makes good arguments with folks on his side, but is incapable of debating opponents of a different political affiliation.  He just can’t do it without purposefully showing lack of reading comprehension skills or out of sheer stubbornness.  He plays games, ignores good arguments and focuses on the low hanging fruit arguments to keep up his desire for attention.

I hope you keep coming around.  This site needs a person who can see right down the middle.  You seem like that type of person.  Keep it up.

I am capable of debate, when a true challenger is present.  It is rare that one shows up at SAB.

Well, if you are this upset about it, obviously it is not a lie.

And to clarify, Barri is not intelligent enough to be the anti-Christ.

Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

Kenny, don’t confuse Honolulu Taxidriver with facts! That makes it cry.

Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

I can do what my opponents can’t.

Lie, babble aimlessly and never apologize for your mistakes? Oh, yeah! You’ve got that down pat!

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

I can admit when I am wrong.

Like your W-2 indicates intelligence argument? We’re still waiting nearly a month for that one!

No, Hannitized, what you do is reinvent yourself every now and then. You come as a foul mouthed petulant child and then a couple of days later, you chide someone for being childish. You attack someone unprovoked and then a couple of days later cry because someone is attacking you without a cause.

Talk about games! The biggest game you play here is “Look at me!” Every thread you drop your meconium slime trail into reeks of your ego and your inability to accept the fact that you start arguments without all the facts, or with wooly headed reasoning just to bust somebody’s chops.

I do name call on occasion

Days that end in “Y”.

Proof is just a partisan idiot

when I do try to offer up argument without insults, they just insult me anyway.  This is just the nature of this blog.

Care to offer up any proof of that, lying troll? Link me. I’ll wait here.
(See: “cry because someone is attacking you without a cause” above.)

According to Hannitized, Hannitized is the only smart one on this site. Also the only honest and unbiased one on this site. And he lies about other things as well!

Anyone is free to defend this dishonest troll as long as they like. Just don’t be surprised if your own credibility suffers for it!

Petulant lying troll: Hannitized’s biography in three words.

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

The Decider: Something for you to consider before you further decide:
Read this post. Decide for yourself whether or not it was “political”. Then look at all the irrelevant comments, name calling, personal attacks and thread hijacking by Troll Hussein Hannitized and tell me what you believe the point of the post was and whether or not the troll Hannitized responded properly to it?

For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan