DI-it’s just plain dumb to believe in the simplistic notion that people who have wealth are entitled to keep it, and to have an antipathy towards the means of redistributing wealth. er…isn’t it? We better ask Jim Moran, huh?

She jus keepn’ id gansta Bat… Ize wait’n fo dat ol new gov mint to fis mi soul, too…like home girl be say’n.. amerika soul be broke’n

Where do I send my receipts for the gasoline that I buy so that I can be reimbursed for it, and since my mortgage has been paid off for well over 10 years can I receive retroactive reimbursment? I’m guessing 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue after the latter part of Jan. 2009, but I think they guy who will reside there at the time will suddenly be broke.

, AP Business Writer
Wall Street falls sharply as investors, worrying about recess, ponder Obama impact on economy

NEW YORK (AP) — A case of postelection nerves sent Wall Street plunging Wednesday as investors, looking past Barack Obama’s presidential victory, returned to their fears of a deep and protracted recession. Volatility swept over the market again, with the Dow Jones industrials falling nearly 500 points and all the major indexes tumbling more than 5 percent.

Hmmmmmm.

There is no “bottom-up” economic plan; the first step in starting a new business or expanding a successful one is to amass the capital required. That capital then creates jobs and prosperity for the workers, suppliers and finally, the owners of the business(after everyone else gets paid). Prosperity always flows from areas of greater concentration to areas of lesser concentrations, it simply can’t flow in the other direction. Next time you need a job or a loan, ask a homeless guy.

I am really interested in this new building of wealth from the bottom up. My husband and I together have 4 different businesses, and we both have agreed that it will be extremely interesting to see this in action.

anon says;

She is in fact saying, “worry,” you ignoramus.

Yes, Jackass. And why would BO’s election make her ecstatically cry out her lack of worry about mortgage and gas??
Maybe because she doesn’t think she’ll have to pay them anymore??
She’s totaly Sub-Prime, and so are you anon.

I have some questions and hopefully some dems can help me with them.
1) Why are there so many problems with schools, high drop out rates, money, & crime in many big cities controlled by dems?
2) Why do poor people continue to vote for dems, and still continue to be poor?
3) Why do states like Oregon that are struggling with high unemployment, etc. where all three facets of state government are controlled by dems, vote for more dems, including a dem for President?

I think I have the answer to #3. Dems are great when it comes to deflecting their own local/state problems onto Bush, when in fact they should be looking in the mirror to see who the problem is.
The state of ND (RED state) controlled by R’s is doing great economically and has over 1 billion in the bank.

Woof: Twist and spin all you like; read “The Doctrine of the Invisible Hand”. Read it until it sinks in.

Headline shamelessly stolen from Michelle Malkin

is that all?

Why should this lady get to quit worrying about her mortgage and fuel bills? I still have to worry about mine…

She is in fact saying, “worry,” you ignoramus. Have fun with your blog now, rob… now that the elections are over and without the extra cash-flow from advertising on your blog… you might actually consider a bottom-up rather than trickle-down economic plan… as the rest of America has clearly decided.

“Worry.” “Work.” Does it really change her meaning? She’s not wanting to take responsibility for her own life.

As for the cash-flow from this blog, if you think I’m making any significant amount of money from this you’re kidding yourself. But I do expect traffic to remain high. This blog will continue to be one of the most visited political blogs on the internet, I assure you.

Much to your consternation, I’m sure.