The White House Is Talking, But The Media Isn’t Listening

This “Bush to announce timetable for Iraq” stuff is getting a bit ridiculous.
Consider this article from the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON – The fledgling Iraqi government must “step up and take more responsibility” for the country’s security, a high-ranking White House official said Monday.
At the same time, Dan Bartlett denied in a television interview that the Bush administration’s war policy has been a sweeping “stay the course” commitment, saying “what we aren’t doing is sitting there with our heads in the sand.”
In contrast to earlier White House statements, Bartlett did not deny a New York Times report saying the head of the U.S.-led Multinational Forces in Iraq and the U.S. ambassador were working on a plan that for the first time would set a specific timetable for disarming militias and meeting other political and economic goals.

Bartlett didn’t deny a specific timetable? I think he did, because in the very next paragraph he says:

“I was a bit puzzled about the report over the weekend because it was stating something that we’ve been talking publicly about for months,” the senior White House counselor said on CBS’s “The Early Show.” Bartlett said the goal is to “define demonstrable milestones and benchmarks” and said it has been “very much a part of our strategy all along.”

As I pointed out over the weekend, there is absolutely nothing to support the idea that the Bush administration is going to announce a “timetable for withdrawal.” Nothing. From everything I’ve heard, the Bush administration is set to announce a set of goals that must be reached before we can withdraw from Iraq.
I believe what’s going on here is a bit of pre-spin by the media. They’re trying to play this forthcoming policy announcement on Iraq as a reversal of earlier policy for the Bush administration. They want Americans to believe that Bush is caving to pressure from opponents and establishing a withdrawal date, but I just don’t think that’s a conclusion that’s supported by what we know so far.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array HG

    Your not you’re.

  • aNONOMISLY

    I think we need to give the inept Iraqi political leadership a timetable. Its unconsionable that Iraq’s oil is the biggest funding source for al-Qaeda and other terrorists there.

    al-Maliki et al give little hope and mostly despair:

    The sabotage attacks that have crippled Iraq’s oil pipelines and refineries for the past three years are now being used to aid a vast smuggling network that is costing the Iraqi government billions of dollars a year, senior Iraqi and American officials here say.

    Once thought to be only a tool for insurgents to undermine the government, the pipeline attacks have evolved into a lucrative moneymaking scheme for insurgents and enterprising criminal gangs alike. Ali Al Alak, the inspector general for the Oil Ministry, said the attacks are now orchestrated by both groups to force the government to import and distribute as much fuel as possible using thousands of tanker trucks

    Not only does the inept Iraqi government have to import oil, which costs over ten times what it did some years ago, but..

    as much as 30 percent of imported gasoline is promptly stolen and resold abroad by smugglers, according to American and Iraqi officials. The shortfall is part of what forces Iraqi families to spend more on fuel from the black market, where it is far more expensive than from legal outlets. The poisonous blend of smuggling and sabotage is yet another blow to the economy of a country whose huge oil reserves were expected before the 2003 invasion to pay for its reconstruction

    Iraq spent $4 billion to $5 billion in 2005 to import fuel from abroad. Alak’s research indicates that because of the huge price incentives, between 10 percent and 30 percent of that fuel is smuggled out of the country again.

    The chief of the Commission on Public Integrity, Radhi al-Radhi, who has investigated dozens of smuggling cases, agreed with Alak’s assessment, as did a Western diplomat in Baghdad, who spoke anonymously according to official procedure. Similar figures were also cited in little-noticed Congressional testimony in April by David M. Walker, comptroller general of the United States, after a visit to Iraq

    In Iraq’s oil they’ve found their money raising Mecca.

  • HG

    Rob,

    You’re analysis is spot on.

  • Pilgrim

    Nothing the slanted media does – or doesn’t do – surprises me. Our local rag the Times-Picayune (New Orleans) beat the Foley thing to pieces, runs nothing but far left political cartoons, and has printed NOT ONE WORD, nada, zip, about the Harry Reid real estate scam. Go figure. Biased media? Naaaahhh.

  • aNONOMISLY`

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development