National Socialist Party

I’ll say it again: You guys are getting hung up on semantics and symbolism. What really matters is policy and action.

1. Insistence of Master Race (Master Culture for Fundie/Cons).
2. Religious Xenophobia (Jews with the Nazis, Muslims for Cons)
3. Belligerent Nationalism (“REAL AMERICANS”)
4. Love of War
5. Spirited “schoolyard bully” style radio propaganda (and now internet and TV; Fox News)
6. Cult of the leader (Rush Limbaugh, Reagan, Bush)
7. Use of a National tragedy as reason to diminish civil liberties (Nazis had the Reichstag Fire, Rethugs had 9/11)
8. Use of scapegoats (Jews Commies, Liberals Mexicans Homosexuals)
9. Contempt for Democracy and the Rule of Law (“A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier…” –Bush)
10. Blame all others for problems (Nazis blamed Jews Commies and impure races for all their problems : Cons blame Mexicans Liberals Homosexuals etc. everybody but themselves)

Also:

mis·no·mer (mÄ­s-nō’mÉ™r)
n.

1. An error in naming a person or place.
2.
1. Application of a wrong name.
2. A name wrongly or unsuitably applied to a person or an object.

The real point that I am trying to get across is that Hannity, Rush, Coulter, and Savage are hiding behind the same laws as pedophiles. Nazis (Right-Wing Media et al.) and pedophiles are lucky they live in a open Democratic society where free speech is defended not matter how vile and disgusting it is.

A Fundie/Con moron

Two more lies from a fascist leftie pathological liar. Can you cite any evidence for your claim that I’m a fundamentalist(although I’m guessing you don’t mean fundamentalist muslim, like your terrorist buddies)? Any evidence of my IQ?
You just keep making stuff up to distract from how badly you’ve had your lies smacked with the truth. You have nothing but lying personal attack.

H, you are not starting off the new era of peace, love and underestimating on the right foot.
It would sure be swell if you could be kinder and gentler in your responses.

the ole’ knob is of his meds again.

Rush Limbaugh is a clown who believes after he crafts a bicycle from twisted balloons, he can ride a marathon on it.

gungle berry

Is that any why to refer to Berry O now that we’ve agreed to be less hostile to the President

Hawk, if I didn’t know better I’d think you didn’t want to work together for a better synergy of peaceful coexistence.
where is your youthful exuberance for the excitement of facing the world afresh?
come on join us in this brave new tomorrow.

presses fawning attention to Obama.

Whistler, just to give the press the benefit of the doubt, maybe they have seen the error of their ways for the past eight years and have decided that “hate-filled, vile and pernicious, is no way to go through life” and are merely getting a head start on Robs recipe for the new American melting pot.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/ecoterrorists-burn-ski-resort-1180024.html

Remember who ELF is liberal assholes? The left is full of violent loon terrorist assholes.

One of the most popular Right-Wing arguments against the ACLU is one case where they defended a member of NAMBLA.

The essential factoids Right-Wing Authoritarians forget(?) (selective cognition) about this case is that the ACLU was not defending or promoting “the right to molest children”. What they were indeed defending was the First Amendment. The defendant wrote material on how to molest children. This ideas in his publication were later used by an individual who had no personal connection to the author. Using the ideas found in the defendant’s publication lead to a crime that resulted in the murder of a child.

The court case was an attempt to implicate partial responsibility of the defendant for the death of the child. The case was dismissed because the defendant was not personally involved with the murder of the child and any attempt to link the independent actions of individuals with the ideas of an author violates the First Amendment.

Right-Wingers do not view that case as defending the Constitution. They view it as a failure of an amoral criminal justice system. Right-Wing “reasoning” (knee-jerk visceral/emotional reactionism) to leads to the idea that both the author and the murderer should rot in jail, regardless of the author’s lack of involvement with the murder itself.

Lets look at this from another perspective:

Do you remember Jim David Adkisson? He murdered 1 person and injured 8 others in his rampage against “Liberalism” in a Unitarian church in Knoxville, TN last summer. Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church was no ordinary church. As Bill Moyers said,

“The church advocates social justice and tolerance, and it openly welcomes gay, lesbian, and transgendered members.”

The authorities found Right-Wing books such as Michael Savage’s “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder” and Sean Hannity’s “Let Freedom Ring” who both openly demonize, dehumanize, and brand Liberals as “the Enemy within” in their false dichotomous world view, thus justifying any violent acts committed against Liberals.

By all means Hannity, Savage, Coulter and the rest of the Right-Wing media are equally responsible for the murder and injuries of the Unitarian church members as the pedophile author in the case above.

So I ask this:
Why the double standard? If an author is responsible for the actions of individual in one case shouldn’t the precedence follow for all other cases where authors influence the actions of individuals?

Rush Limbaugh was the never ending bag of gas circus freak. They kicked him off the tour in the 80s.

America is not a censorious place, but if a lightning bolt were to come out of the sky and absolutely obliterate the Fox News studios, I would weep no tears. A more mendacious group of jackasses and jackassettes cannot be imagined, and they are to be held entirely accountable for every bit of right wing looniness that there is in the country. People like Coulter, Hannity, Beck, O’Reilly and Limbaugh are, in fact, traitors to what America is, and they should be tried and punished as such.

Ever hear of Margaret Sanger who founded Planned Parenthood? Very big on eugenics and not letting inferior races breed.

Uh huh…

I was telling a younger friend of mine (a bio major at the state school) about that exact Conservative meme just the other day. He was dumbfounded at the stupidity of that statement. He also noted that Conservatives like to express the opposite of conventional wisdom and fact and call it “Truth”. Why is that? Can you tell me? Is there something wrong with the Conservative thinking process?

He was also telling me about his college roommate at UMass Amherst. His roommate considers himself a Conservative and is part of the Republican club on campus. He was telling me about how the Republican club attracts psychos and assholes. For instance, this one dude in the club has several restraining orders out and was accused of rape by his ex-girlfriend. A really nice fella… One guy I personally met from the club was 100% racist. I couldn’t tell if he was joking or not, but he would not shut-up about how “blacks aren’t even human.” Fucking psychos. And the one time the club tried to eat at a restaurant, when it was finally time to pay the bill they came $50 short because some assholes with overinflated senses of self-importance and feelings of deserving decided to skip out without paying. Fucking assholes.

And the roommate himself, he’s a good kid and all, but he has this really fucked up mentality. He’s always complaining and outraged (this is what Conservative talk radio and TV sells, outrage) over something that is reverberating in the Right-Wing echo chamber (Liberals, Obama, the Fed) and he’s unbelievability socially awkward. And even though he lives on campus he is never there. People are always asking where he is… He isn’t invited to parties, he is not very smart and he gets poor grades (Computer Science) and hates all the classes everyone else loves (they’re too “Liberal”). And even though he complains ALL THE TIME and is socially awkward he is still likable and he does good things for people, even though he thinks everybody else is a “Jackass”.

I find it really sad to see what Conservatism has done to a good kid who may yet have great potential… So it goes, I guess.

Anyway, why should Conservatives let other give them a bad name when they do such a good job all by their little selves.

Right-Wing arguments…

Since you are unable to provide your personal definition of “right wing”, one must disregard everything you say.
From your mendacious content, it seems you consider real American values and principles to be “right wing”. Simply untrue.

Since the early 50s Nazism/Fascism has been identified as being Far-Right (right-wing extremists) totalitarianism.

Your ignorance of the fact that the English translation of the full name of the Nazi Party in Germany(which is from your list, btw) is actually the National Socialist Party. National socialism is exactly what Obama is trying to institute in this country, with his nationalizing the business sector, starting with the banks, continuing to the auto industry, and aiming for the healthcare industry, and so on, and so forth.
In your ignorance, you unconsciously reveal the truth that you lefties are really fascists, even though you lie about being liberal or progressive. In fact, real liberals and progressives support individual independence, and you guys want all powerful central govt.
BTW, “national” in German is “Nazional”, which is where the term “Nazi” came from.
Like Obama, Hitler controlled the major industries in his time as the ruler of Germany, just like Obama is trying to do now, and he is using many of the same arguments for his actions.

Man Train, Do you have to be spoon fed everything you believe? You got a fricken brain, right? Use it.

Everybody who has paid any attention at all to Sanger knows she’s a loon. Where the hell have you been?

I agree. Rob, you do your best to be honorable. No sense in becoming as ugly as the other side.

It’s only sad that the liberals on the post can’t even congratulate you for your effort. Well, of course I expect that now. They were the ugly bitter side.

They’ve been humiliated by their election losses. And that’s hugely dangerous, because authoritarian leaders react uniquely badly to being humiliated.

Experts tell us that their huge egos and insatiable need for control make them very brittle — and that the shattering point is often a specific event that publicly repudiates their authority, or makes it obvious to the world and their followers that they are no longer in control. Decisively losing both the White House and the Congress has been all that and then some.

This overweening humiliation is growing every day that the Democrats and their new president stay in power. It’s a pain that will not go away, and it’s likely to curdle into something far more venomous in time.

The result, unfortunately, is probably going to be more violent attacks on government authority like the one in Pittsburgh last month.

http://www.alternet.org/democracy/139825/the_far_right's_first_100_days:_getting_more_extreme_by_the_day/?page=1

Hey “DINO”-

You are a lib who spends all his time on a popular conservative blog… and jump on every thread early and often with a bunch of snarky drivel. Do you have a job, or are you counting on Uncle Bam to take care of you?

Steer the topic. Change the subject. Deflect and divert.

It’s sure hard to avoid the conclusion that there are organized trolls attempting to hijack and control all internet debate to maintain momentum for The One as he rams-through an ultra-liberal agenda while also focused on 2010… and 2012.

Explains all the facsination with Palin and Jindal… if they’re so silly and irrelevant, why the obsession? And it’s not difficult to see why the Democrats might prefer to banter playfully about made-up GOP “scandals” and irrelevancies like Meghan McCain’s latest bit than debate Obama’s ongoing destruction of the country.

They likely have assignments, like a crew on Politico, one on Topix, and solos like yourself on specific blogs. It’s not like it’s not obvious… why else would you spend all your time on a “con” blog… and try to dominate it? And you stick to the party attack-line 99%.

Obama campaign manager David Plouffe has admitted that there is such a web-based effort in support of Obama… he runs it… and it’s funded by the DNC:

“David Plouffe, who ran Obama’s campaign, now runs “Organizing for America” out of the DNC. It uses the same Web-based tactics that won the presidency to mobilize public opinion behind Obama’s initiatives.”

It is well known that this strategy involves trolls like yourself who attempt to disrupt any constructive debate on conservative boards… and thus we are blessed with your presence.

But employing such a manipulation on blogs and message-boards serepticiously is really not clever, slick, or anything to be proud of… rather, it’s underhanded, cowardly, and ethically dubious.

If Obama’s wisdom and moral supremacy are so self-evident, then what’s all this thought-control and propaganda for?

So you found a blogger who agrees with you and that’s authoritative enough for you? Yeah. Right!

I didn’t know “Library” was in the Conservative vocabulary.

Spoken like a truly ignorant twit. Buh- bye now!

Hey, Man Train- Is that your name or is that what you want? I see you`re content with your own stupidity like little Dino is. “Conservatives want to keep education away from children in general.” Sure. It couldn`t be that we want to keep them away from all those wonderful pulic school systems. You sound like you went to one, so why would we? Damn! Some people are stupid!

MT: Please define who you think the “far right” is.
Far left domestic terrorism has been going on since the extreme lefties violently took over the Dem National Convention in 1968, and has continued to increase since then, to the extent that they have taken over the Dem Party, which is not extreme far left, with Dem politicians regularly making Marxist and fascist pronouncements in the media.
In addition, there are many far left terrorist groups, using environmentalism as an excuse for intimidation and violence against real Americans, day after day.
Telling the truth about Obama’s fascist takeover of this country is our Constitutional right to self-defense.

Liberal fascism = Oxymoron

There’s been a quantum leap in the sheer down-the-rabbit-hole surreality of their beliefs about the world. Bloggers have been pointing out for years that conservatives have zero compunction about making shit up; but in the past, their prevarications were almost always built around a kernel of fact, wrapped in thick layers of distortion, mis-attribution or lies of omission.

What’s new in the past 100 days is that we’re now seeing stories that are just flat-out fabulation, without even so much as a nod to reality. They’re not even bothering to try to attach these claims to any kind of truth. Their fantasies are so much truthier to them.

Up is down. Black is white. Obama’s not a citizen, he’s going to take our guns, Congress is about to legalize incest … this we believe, and there is no expert and no amount of real-world evidence that can ever convince us otherwise.

The right wing’s retreat from consensus reality has finally left it living in an Orwellian alternative universe all its own.

http://www.alternet.org/democracy/139825/the_far_right's_first_100_days:_getting_more_extreme_by_the_day/?page=1

Limbaugh is a circus clown who thinks his plastic red nose has an ability to smell out a rat

http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

Anyone with a brain? Anyone with a brain knows that fundamentalist psychos will do anything to save those little babies, even lie.

Find me a non-biased source and I’ll consider it.

25. When he went on line to check his investment portfolio, he could make investment decisions because he could trust the information he got, thanks to the SEC. (Note: this has been increasingly difficult since 2000 due to emasculation of the regulatory process by Joe’s own party!)
26. When he called his travel agent for a flight to The Bigger City, he reasonably expected that he would arrive there safely, thanks to the FAA’s enormous roll in making this happen.
27. He didn’t even know or appreciate the immense roll of the Weather Service and the GPS satellites in his travels. Two.
28. Joe could read. (Obviously his public school experience was some time ago!)

29. Joe had attended an excellent state university, one of the many that are the envy of millions around the world. Joe’s education was heavily subsidized by taxes, and he was able to get federal loans at low interest rates to help further. Two.
30. When Joe lost his previous job, he qualified for Unemployment Insurance for six months. Although times were tough, he was able to keep his house. He also found his current job with the help of the state job agency. Two.
31. While Joe was on line, he checked his bank account. It was safe and secure, thanks to banking laws.
32. The air Joe was breathing while he was in The Bigger City was better than it was thirty years ago despite more people and cars. Thank you, EPA!
33. Joe worked for a software developer, who in turn, got business from government agencies and other businesses. One of those businesses had large contracts to built radar systems for the US Air Force. So, a lot of his company’s income depended on government tax monies! Two.

And for a bonus 51st example:
34. Of course, Mom’s bingo parlor was under the watchful eye of the state!

Gee, it’s not even lunch time yet!

We should have locked them up after McVeigh’s stunt.

Pure fascism.

Instead, we spend millions taking away toothpaste tubes over 3 ounces from people at the airport.

That was due to the real terrorism of your islamofascist buddies, so stop whining, boy!

We should be spending that money monitoring the right wing, the real threats to our safety.

Another example of your fascism, little dino.

Rush is a traitor, and his actions are harmful to long standing American traditions, such as voting.

He will say and do anything to make a buck and not one bit of difference.

We can laugh at his endless teleprompter gaffes. We can laugh at all the foolish little mistakes Obama and his people are going to make in general. But there’s a line between humor/parody and outright pettiness.

You will have to shut down your blog if you really believe this. Most of what you post about Obama is outright pettiness.

Limbaugh is a circus clown who thinks his plastic red nose has an ability to smell out a rat and his clown shoes provides him sure footing.

But there’s a line between humor/parody and outright pettiness.

Tell us when you find it.

Let’s not let the opposition to Obama devolve into the sort of outright hatred we saw aimed at President Bush.

Smells like victimhood whining to me.

No one could ever be as nasty as conservatives. Think back to the Clinton years. Blackmail over his sex life ring any bells?

Rush is a traitor

This little fellow’s banana doesn’t go all the way to the top of the tree!

How so?
Man Train,
You’re off your rocker.
HG on May 6, 2009 at 02:27 pm

HG, MAN Train is a moron and isn’t worthy of the breath, every post he has posted is lacking, knowledge, facts and substance. Also, the left doesn’t like opposing views and tries to squash anything that takes issue with their policies.

I’m reading a really good article that ALL non Right-Wing extremists should read. Please, inform yourself of the coming tide of Right-Wing domestic terrorism.

http://www.alternet.org/democracy/139825/the_far_right's_first_100_days:_getting_more_extreme_by_the_day/?page=4The Far Right’s First 100 Days: Getting More Extreme by the Day

Their talk is turning ugly, and it’s not unthinkable that we could be in for a wave of domestic terrorism unseen since the mid-’90s.
[/url]

Onslaught = gungle berry.

Little groupie: in the first place, your level of intelligence doesn’t support you arrogant assumption that you have any idea what I think. Your use of obscenities instead of valid counter argument reveals your emotionalism, since you have to reasoned argument.
Again, strategic forethought would be pre-emptive action to take the fight to the enemy, and has nothing to do with the ongoing pandering and appeasement, not to mention bowing down, to the terrorists by this administration.

MT: Your stupid stereotype thinking reveals your hostility and ignorance about those who know much more than you do. I attended schools that weren’t under the control of leftie fascists, so I acquired a real education, unlike you, apparently.
Get help.

Now, now Dino, we’re all pledged to play nice in our new moderate sand pile.

This overweening humiliation is growing every day that the Democrats and their new president stay in power. It’s a pain that will not go away, and it’s likely to curdle into something far more venomous in time.

The result, unfortunately, is probably going to be more violent attacks on government authority like the one in Pittsburgh last month.

One can only hope that Gunsels like 2Hotel and Gilligan don’t over reach with their paranoia, after listening to their golden god, Rush Limbaugh.

Margaret Sanger in her own words:

On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
“…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning… human beings who never should have been born.” Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people

Could you find a less biased source? A pro-life website will say anything that supports the dogmatic ideology. They’ll do anything to save those little babies, even lie.

Hey, isn’t lying a sin? Irony.

Hitler was a totalitarian fascist, just like you leftie extremists. You fascists want to take over business, tell everybody what to do, when to do it, what to drive, what to eat, and how much you can be paid. Your poo-flinging pal, little dino regularly vents his hateful anger toward all who don’t buy your lockstep ideology, and wants to round up and imprison all “conservatives and Republicans”. You guys are fascists, clearly.

Learning the Constitution and real American History is not “indoctrination” like what now goes on in govt schools.

Do instead you were homeschooled and learned about the Bible instead of learning about Logic, Math and Science. Good work mom.

Hey, isn’t lying a sin?

Yes, but you can find forgiveness if you repent and stop!

Man Train,

Traitors? Quite an accusation. What’s your proof?

And what the hell do you know about what America is?

So, not counter argument, then? Just more teenage posturing and snark?
What meds do you claim I take? Any evidence to back up any of your claims at all?

Margaret Sanger in her own words:

On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
“…human weeds,’ ‘reckless breeders,’ ‘spawning… human beings who never should have been born.” Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people

On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial “purification,” couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the right of married couples to bear children:
Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her “Plan for Peace.” Birth Control Review, April 1932

On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was “to create a race of thoroughbreds,” she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)

On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
“More children from the fit, less from the unfit — that is the chief aim of birth control.” Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12

On the extermination of blacks:
“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,” she said, “if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon

1. I agree; the KKK was a terrorist arm of the Dem Party in the later 19th Century and the first part of the 20th Century, whose purpose was to drive both black and white Republicans out of the South. They were successful until Ronald Reagan brought back equal representation for Republicans in the South.
None of this is relevant today, thanks to President Reagan.

2. You mean homos who practice that sexual deviation? Our Constitution recognizes militias as part of free America, so your claims are false. Real Americans who favor Constitutionally mandated limited govt are real Americans, not “anti-govt”, so your premise is false here.

3. Nazi Germany contained many of the elements Obama is trying to institute in our country today, including govt ownership and control of businesses. Real Americans aren’t “Nazis”, despite the constant leftie propaganda. Lefties, in their lust to control every aspect of life, are the real nazis.

4. People who are exercising their Constitutionally guaranted right of free choice in media are not “extremists” or “right wing”; they are real Americans. Another fail for you.

5. Conservatism is support and agreement with the Constitution and the founding principles of this country. Our Constitution is not “right wing”. Epic fail.

6. If there were any “anti abortion terrorists“, I would agree, but there aren’t any of those. There have been only a few examples of individuals using violence against abortionists, and they were roundly condemned by the real Americans who want to stop the abortion holocaust. There have been no incidents since the one guy was caught. A non-issue.

7. Since we have freedom of worship guaranteed in our Constitution, you are dead wrong again. In fact, your far left extremism wants to punish thoughts and beliefs, in typical fascist governance, where actual crimes are about illegal behavior. Freedom of worship is not illegal behavior. Your fascism is obvious here.

8. You use a false claim for an event that never happened, so epic fail again. In fact, it is Obama who is violating our Constitution, almost on a daily basis.
There was no torture, nor was there any actual wiretapping, but your zeal to give aid and comfort to the Islamofascists who are trying to destroy us is noted as further proof of your fascism.

Niart Nam has totally slipped his trolley! Heh.

1. Militant KKK members (Robert Byrd Democrats?)
2. Anti-Government teabaggers and militia men (soo to be domestic terrorists)
2. (sic) Nazi Germany
3. Fox News viewers
4. Those whom consider themselves Conservative

What? Number 2 so great you used it twice? What a maroon!

One of your #2′s (coincidentally, most of your posts resemble #2 – probably adds to your infatuation with the number!)
“Nazi Germany” was controlled by the National Socialist Party. Extra points if you know what a “socialist” is!

You are so far detached from reality, Niart Nam, that you’re hardly worth responding to, other than for comic relief!

Seek professional psychiatric help. Seriously.

little groupie: Becoming panderers and appeasers like the Dems is the way of failure. We need to strongly contrast our American values with their fascist values, and pound that information ceaselessly. It’s a matter of education, fool, not becoming leftie fellow travelers.

Look at the fallacies and contradictions.
Look at the dishonesty.
Look at the virulent stupidity.

I have. It’s spelled:
M-a-n T-r-a-i-n.

Which is why I suggested it toddle off!

Niart Nam: Earlier you bleated:

Those who watched Bush Jr. wipe his ass with the constitution (torture and warrantless eavesdropping for instance)

Answer me this, biased troll: Which is worse, the waterboarding under the Bush years, or the rendition of the Clinton years which sent people to countries that actually utilized real torture?

Or does your hypocrisy limit you to busting on conservatives alone?

America is not a censorious place…

More evidence that you leftie fascists are unAmerican, with your lust to censor and smear everyone who reveals the truth behind your lies.

HG: Lefties get things backward; I think it’s a genetic flaw.

Damn, I’m good!

pathetic.

nuff said

Conservative meme = history.

Historical Revisionism.

Where do you get this shit anyway? You’re so entrenched with fallacies I believe you’re in the need of a helping hand to do some string pulling. I want to help you find out the real sources of your misinformation, other than the obvious Fox News of course.

No, I tell you to get lost because you’re a dishonest twit. You haven’t proved that any of my sources were inaccurate, now have you, dishonest twit?

You have yet to prove your sources are accurate, but the mere fact that those quotes originate from extremely biased fundamentalist websites does not put aside my doubts of serious fact-fudging on the behalf of their cause. They are well known for this.

Having failed to make any valid arguments, the insane lefties go to emotionalism, obscenity and personal attacks based on their own perception of reality.
It’s sad, really. Just a little trollsmacking, and they fall apart.

Man Train, I want to thank you. I followed the link you provide to the quote you used which so eloquently expressed the thoughts you had tightly bottled up inside.
while there I happened to glance over and observe the plight of the poor man depicted above, and all I can say is… WHY! for heavens sake! why? won’t one of you hard-hearted progressives who surely must visit this web site more often than your average joe, give this man half of your banana?

Is that really so much to ask?

I think it’s a genetic flaw.

A Fundie/Con moron talking about genetics!? Oh the irony!

ManTrain,

Hahaha! That was funny as shit. You nailed em.

Niart Nam: Your eyes are brown because you’re so full of it! Why don’t you go hang around some lefty blog where they will accept your wooly headed fallacies without question?
Here we deal in fact. That leaves you out.

What the fuck? I call you on your biased sources and you tell me to get lost?

Now that’s not very honest…

Man Train, I sincerely believe that some time spent helping others might be good for your psyche right about now.

Why don’t you try to find that poor man from the web site you referenced earlier and feed him your banana?

http://www.alternet.org/democracy/139825/the_far_right's_first_100_days:_getting_more_extreme_by_the_day/?page=4The Far Right’s First 100 Days: Getting More Extreme by the Day

Their talk is turning ugly, and it’s not unthinkable that we could be in for a wave of domestic terrorism unseen since the mid-‘90s.
[/url]

I didn’t know “Library” was in the Conservative vocabulary. I know that “NASCAR”, “Beer” and “Nigger” is in the conservative vocab, but not “Library”. I learn something new about you guys every day. I’m surprised teabagger wasn’t in your collective vocabs…

Anyway, yeah… I used the Google search term “Margaret Sanger meme” and it turned up a very good point:

One quote that the pro-lifers wrongly accredit to Sanger is: “The mass of ignorant Negroes still breed carelessly and disastrously, so that the increase among Negroes, even more than the increase among whites, is from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit, and least able to rear their children properly.” This quote was actually made by NAACP founder W.E.B. Dubois. Let me make it clear. I am not writing this to promote eugenics or Margaret Sanger. What I am saying is that conservatives should not try to win debates by to tenuously tying their opponents to politically incorrect views held by people who died years ago. Virtually ever single prominent American before 1960 would be considered a racist by today’s standards.

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/margaret_sanger_and_the_eugenics_meme/

Of course Proof will accuse the author of being a “Liberal Sympathizer” or some other psychotic garbage…

MT: Please define who you think the “far right” is.
Far left domestic terrorism has been going on since the extreme lefties violently took over the Dem National Convention in 1968, and has continued to increase since then, to the extent that they have taken over the Dem Party, which is not extreme far left, with Dem politicians regularly making Marxist and fascist pronouncements in the media.
In addition, there are many far left terrorist groups, using environmentalism as an excuse for intimidation and violence against real Americans, day after day.
Telling the truth about Obama’s fascist takeover of this country is our Constitutional right to self-defense.

Translation:
THE GOVERNMENT IS COMING TO GET YOU! IT IS TIME TO DEFEND YOURSELF AND REMOVE OUR ENEMIES BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!

It is this kind of rhetoric that the paranoid Right-Wing extremists believe. Read the article. They establish a dualism of Us-Vs-Them, Good-Vs-Evil, to dehumanize others. This justifies any future violence they will commit.

http://www.alternet.org/democracy/139825/the_far_right's_first_100_days:_getting_more_extreme_by_the_day/?page=4

Rush Limbaugh is a clown who believes…

Name-calling… the last resort of the frustrated adolescent and the intellectually disabled.

As for “riding a marathon” Rush’s 20 year record and his unprecedented financial success (current contract: over $300 million) certainly put him head and shoulders above anything the “progressive” Left has to offer in rebuttal. Obviously, Limbaugh hasn’t floundered into oblivion by defrauding a Boys and Girls Club for the urban disadvantaged youths.

What meds do you claim I take?

Lithium does wonders for people like you. Zoloft might help as well.

With the help of a good drug regiment and years of therapy you might eventually be able to live like a normal person.

Man Train,

Have you ever heard of a generalization, or painting with too broad a brush?

Let me give you an example:

Every heard of the unibomber? Yeah? Well, he’s the typical liberal. Yeah, liberals like to go around and terrorize. Why is that?

See how that works?

I like it Rob, mud sling, act like a baby then decry your own actions or mislabel them mature in a feeble attempt to change history.

Nutters crack me up.

Obama’s from Hawaii, right?

I agree. Rob, you do your best to be honorable. No sense in becoming as ugly as the other side.

BS he does. He doesn’t do any research. All he does is find the most attacking stories on other blogs and post them here with very little comment. He doesn’t even do basic research to test their accuracy.

Oh so we are supposed to believe your bullshit repot that you have linked. That web page is fucken joke… It’s basically making my argument that Liberal Fascism in on the move. First step is stiffling debate and speech that doesn’t agree with the liberal leader. That stupid article just illustrates that.

They’re putting themselves in direct opposition to state power — and identifying that power as their primary enemy.

All groups headed for a violent confrontation eventually come to believe that their enemies are somehow aligned with the government — and the government is out to get them. Conservatives are coming up hard against this one now that they no longer control the government themselves. Back when they were gleefully dismantling the Constitution and building a surveillance state, it never occurred to them that they might someday be out of power.

Now, of course, they’re terrified to find all that unleashed, unaccountable power in the hands of Libruls and That Black Guy.

Weirdly, they seem to have almost total amnesia about their role in all this. To hear them tell it, Barack Obama seized all this power for himself in just the past three months. Given that epic memory failure, there’s not much hope that they’ll draw the right lessons from this reversal.

It’s far more likely that their newfound terror of government power will lead them to resent — and eventually overreact to — even casual encounters with government authority.

http://www.alternet.org/democracy/139825/the_far_right's_first_100_days:_getting_more_extreme_by_the_day/?page=1

My hatred is not for Obama, it’s for the talking heads and ideologues who took advantage of the current national psychological attention span and used it to accidentally create this standalone complex presidency where a man who was on every side of every issue and totally undefined was allowed to run in the minds of the people against a president who wasn’t even up for reelection.

Mass social phenomena are not just academic. It may be free speech to say the things they do about Bush and whatnot but the constant pounding of it, the barrage of it and the consistency of the message put us on track for this presidency with Obama.

We have very little chance of avoiding a similar phenomenon as the public is now after decades of this kind of politicking from the left (Nixon, Reagan, Bush) very receptive to it. The one thing working in favor of our honor on this is that the media is overwhelmingly left wing. If not, we could easily set up an Obama-Not Obama theme in the public mind.

Of course, they did that themselves with Carter with no help from the media which was cheerleading for that idiot despite the country wanting to run him out of Washington on a rail. We may see that sort of boomerang effect again.

Reaganite Republican:

If Obama’s wisdom and moral supremacy are so self-evident, then what’s all this thought-control and propaganda for?

They know, and it scares them, that the only reason Obama was elected was because he was running against a president who wasn’t even up for reelection. NOT because the public agreed with Obama. Had Obama come out obviously in any unique way it would have resulted in more press just for the sensationalism. He was on every side of every issue and as insubstantial as Roseanne Barr’s willpower when presented with a box of Twinkies.

They desperately want people to like them, love them, think the world of them, look up to them, listen to them. They desperately want this election to be vindication of them. It’s not and it’s slipping away and that frightens them.

But you knew that, right?