The Recession That Was Really An Expansion

The “gloomy economy” the liberals and the journalists (I repeat myself) keep talking about isn’t really all that “gloomy” at all.

What do you call a recession where the economy keeps going up and up, even if a bit sluggishly? Well, my friends, you call that an expansion. And that is what we seem to have right now, despite all the economic doomsaying about a recession or even a Great Depression 2.0. Today, the Commerce Department revised its first-quarter estimate of gross domestic product upward to 0.9 percent from 0.6 percent. That follows 0.6 percent GDP growth in the final quarter of 2007. The revision also makes it more likely that the second quarter will be positive, maybe 1.5 percent, maybe even higher.
Now I went back and checked the numbers for the past 50 years and didn’t find a single case of a recession—as calculated by the National Bureau of Economic Research—that started with or contained two straight quarters of positive GDP growth, much less three quarters.

Given that our economy has continued to grow – albeit sluggishly – in the face of soaring fuel prices and a constant barrage of negativity from the political and media elite is absolutely amazing.
Of course, everything could change, but even so. Comparing the reality of the economy to the way the economy is talked about makes one wonder if the talkers aren’t motivated more by politics than actual concern for the country’s economic outlook.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Steve L.

    Of course, everything could change

    Of course, it will change in November. If Barry wins, everything will be sunshine and rainbows and ponies.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    mygogyourdumb, IF your liberal tree hugging pals would allow the oil companies to free up our own resources, MAYBE you and your pathetic, unemployed pals could get off your butts and go to Work? Bless your pathetic little heart! There are soooooo many jobs, IF you really wanted to WORK.

  • robert108

    ZZ: Yeah; the truth is that it’s the “environazis’ $4/gal gas”, isn’t it?

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Exactly! AND how they love to blame Bush!

  • Bat One

    Understand that name-calling doesn’t strengthen your argument, it displays your inability to articulate a persuasive argument.

    Nunez,

    What you say might be true, but only if an individual’s sole purpose was in fact, to “articulate a persuasive argument.” Few of us are so ruthlessly unemotional… especially those on the Left.

  • Bat One

    Dr. Phil?

    Either that, or a part time bartender.

  • Nunez

    Proof,

    Perfect. Anything you say against Democrats are simply hyperboles.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Perfect. Anything you say against Democrats are simply hyperboles.

    Perfect. You are educated far beyond your intelligence!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    “There are some people so addicted to exaggeration that they can’t tell the truth without lying.” ~Josh Billings

    Am I responsible if you’re too thick to tell the difference?

  • http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/ John Ruberry

    Under President Obama, such news would be presented as an expansion.

  • Spartacus

    If you believe that you have no insecurities, then that is your insecurity.

    Dr. Phil?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    “mygodyouredumb” is the same person as the reprehensible “dannyboy”.

    I thought it smelled familiar!
    You have to consider, lik! “Dumb”/ “Danny’s” ADD probably keeps him from remembering his screen name from one sign on until another!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    it displays your inability to articulate a persuasive argument.

    Possibly I attributed the ADD to the wrong person. On another thread recently I gave you the definition of hyperbole.
    For the ADD impaired, let’s visit it again!

    Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
    hy·per·bo·le /haɪˈpÉœrbÉ™li/ Pronunciation Key – [hahy-pur-buh-lee]
    –noun Rhetoric.
    1. obvious and intentional exaggeration.
    2. an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”

    When I say that someone who comments has ADD, (Pause while Nunez catches up.)
    it is (to most people with at least a room temperature IQ) an obvious and intentional exaggeration. (Pause while Nunez catches up.)
    For you to consistently miss this or assume that I am speaking other than figuratively, or speaking with hyperbole (Pause while Nunez catches up.) is quite tiresome.
    Do I mock people who make stupid statements? (Pause while Nunez catches up.)Yes. Typically, I reserve my harshest sarcasm for those who repeatedly spout vitriolic nonsense or dishonestly represent themselves (or refuse to learn when the facts are presented to them.) (Pause while Nunez catches up.)

    The fact that Dannyboy comes and shreds his credibility so badly that he has to change his user name before showing his figurative face again, qualifies him as dishonest.
    Do I believe he has ADD. No. Does anyone who reads what I said believe that I believe it? No. Not any sane or rational person. (Pause while Nunez catches up.) Unless maybe you do. Do you really? Or are you just using it as a thin excuse to bust on me because of your own “insecurities”? Physician, heal thine own sorry ass!(Pause while Nunez…Nah! I don’t think he will, either!)

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Example of the mind numbingly dense, or hyperbole impaired:
    On a thread about how Democrats are having problems with Al Franken, mygodyouredumb says:

    NEWSFLASH: NEO-CONS HAVE NO SENSE OF HUMOR

    It’s obvious that mgyd either did not read the story with comprehension or chose to ignore it, so as to make his own biased point. I said:

    mgyd: Apparently it’s fellow Democrats that have no sense of humor according to the story! But, apparently, you can’t read!

    Obviously exaggerating, since it’s obvious (to everyone but Nunez) that he can read, write and argue feebly!
    Nunez said:

    If mgyd ‘can’t read’ then why are you typing a comment to him?

    Duh! I keep telling him about hyperbole, demonstrating hyperbole and printing definitions of hyperbole, but Nunez is Nunez. Bless his heart!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    (Pause while Nunez catches up.) Heh.

  • Nunez

    Proof,

    “There are some people so addicted to exaggeration that they can’t tell the truth without lying.” ~Josh Billings

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Ask yourself, “How petty am I when telling people over the computer that I have no idea who they are that they have ADD?” And continue to ask if this could be a reflection upon your own insecurities.

    Ask yourself, “How petty am I when telling people over the computer that I have no idea who they are that they have insecurities?”

    Nunez: If your skin is as thin as Obama’s, join a blog on Powerpuff Girls.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    For the site regulars: the reprehensible “mygodyouredumb” is the same person as the reprehensible “dannyboy”.

  • http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/ John Ruberry

    Under President Obama, such news would be presenteted as an expansion.

  • mygodyouredumb

    Whew, that’s a relief. I can tell all my laid-off buddies that they don’t have to worry about paying $4/gallon for Bush’s gasoline anymore. Just like our gutless leader told us after 9/11, go out and spend money!

  • Nunez

    Proof,

    You have to consider, lik! “Dumb”/ “Danny’s” ADD probably keeps him from remembering his screen name from one sign on until another!

    Ask yourself, “How petty am I when telling people over the computer that I have no idea who they are that they have ADD?” And continue to ask if this could be a reflection upon your own insecurities.

  • robert108

    Rob: Despite the facts on the ground, polling shows that twice as many Americans think we are in a recession as know we aren’t. I have concluded that the reason lefties like polling so much is that it allows them to gauge the effectiveness of their propaganda.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Of course, the “reality based liberals” see a situation opposite of reality all the while bitching about paying for “Bush’s gas”.

    Because we all know that “laid-off buddies” equals a recession and high gas prices equals the United States President’s doing. Nevermind the complexities of the market and reality, for the “progressives” have a story to sell.

  • Nunez

    Proof,

    Perfect. You are educated far beyond your intelligence!

    Thank you.

    Am I responsible if you’re too thick to tell the difference?

    Yes.

  • Nunez

    Bat One,

    Fair enough. It’s not about being ‘unemotional’ it’s about not allowing another person to cause a reactive negative emotion of ‘frustration’ or ‘contempt’ which does more harm to you than them.

    “Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured.” -Mark Twain

    Proof,

    Funny rant.

    “Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment.” -Lao-Tzu

  • Nunez

    Proof,

    If you believe that you have no insecurities, then that is your insecurity. Using the ‘Tu quoque’ argument fails simply because attacking multiple people on multiple occasions on this blog making such stupid assumptions as they have ADD is childlike.

    Thin skin? Your obtuse comment wasn’t directed at me. Understand that name-calling doesn’t strengthen your argument, it displays your inability to articulate a persuasive argument.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development