Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

The Facts On SCHIP

Since the Democrats continue to fight for their massive SCHIP expansion, the White House has released some facts and figures about the issue.  They’re pretty interesting:

* 300%:  Congress’ SCHIP bill would strongly encourage States to provide government health coverage for children in families making 300% of the Federal poverty level.

* $62,000:  300% of the Federal poverty level is nearly $62,000 per year for a family of four.

* $58,865:  The median household income for all households with children under 18 is $58,865.

* 57%:  57% of all children are in families that are at or below 300% of the poverty level.

* 53%:  53% of families with children are at or below 300% of the poverty level.

* 200%:  SCHIP was created to help lower-income children who do not qualify for Medicaid (children in families at or below 200% of the Federal poverty level).

* 500,000:  States have not enrolled in SCHIP more than 500,000 poor children in families under 200% of the poverty level who are eligible.

* 95%:  The President believes 95% of SCHIP-eligible children should be covered before children from wealthier households are covered.

* 2 million:  Of the 5.8 million enrollees Congress’ legislation would attract by 2012, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that 2.0 million (one in three) would drop private insurance to enroll.

It’s pretty interesting that, under the SCHIP expansion, over 50% of American families with children would qualify for tax-payer funded health care.  Are we really supposed to believe that over half of American families are poor and incapable of providing for their own health care?

According to the 500,000 or so children who currently qualify for SCHIP but don’t use it (not to mention the 2 million children who are currently covered by private insurance but would be eligible for the SCHIP expansion), the current program is already covering people who don’t need it.

As I’ve been saying all along, this isn’t about helping people who can’t help themselves. This is about making people dependent on the government for the sake of expanding government power.

Comments

You can still live a pretty good life on $62,000 in Columbus NE, Mitchell SD, the outskirts of Fort Worth, Minot ND, West Texas, even Little Rock and a number of other rural areas, but a family of four cannot survive without assistance in NYC, LA, SF, Chicago, Atlanta, San Jose, Seattle, or other metro areas where most of our population lives. A single person can live like a pauper on $50,000 in these areas. There are exceptions where families established their housing 20 years ago.

ews48 on October 23, 2007 at 03:50 pm
Avatar for IB

Are we really supposed to believe that over half of American families are poor and incapable of providing for their own health care?

No, but what you should realize is that many American families at or near the 300% federal poverty level—middle class—cannot afford health insurance.  I am in one of those families of 4, last year we grossed nearly $70,000, yet my husband has no health insurance and the insurance my employer offered for my children was completely inaffordable, not just the premiums but the high co-pays, deductible, etc.—fortunately, my state offers CHIP for moderate income families and so my kids are now covered, and I don’t have to plop down $50 or more just to run one to the pediatrician for a sore throat. 

Really, the SCHIP just for children shouldn’t be a big deal—it’s for the CHILDREN.  I hope someday there is a program similar for adults so my husband can stop paying out of pocket.

IB on October 30, 2007 at 06:48 am

Really, the SCHIP just for children shouldn’t be a big deal—it’s for the CHILDREN.

Everybody stop thinking because IT’S FOR THE CHILDREN!!!1!!

I hope someday there is a program similar for adults so my husband can stop paying out of pocket.

Personal responsibility is a foreign concept to you. But,..but,..but you say - IT’S FOR THE CHILDREN!!!

likwidshoe on October 30, 2007 at 07:09 am

last year we grossed nearly $70,000, yet my husband has no health insurance and the insurance my employer offered for my children was completely inaffordable,

Pardon me if I find that somewhat unbelievable.  I supported a family on less than that and yes, we didn’t have everything that might be desired but we did have company sponsored health insurance.


The Supreme Court is a bunch of black robed tyrants

docdave on October 30, 2007 at 08:23 am
Avatar for Euaggelos

very well made it. All information on this blog is represented

Euaggelos on July 3, 2008 at 03:41 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.