Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, November 29, 2004

The Baby Gap

This is interesting...

The white people in Republican-voting regions consistently have more children than the white people in Democratic-voting regions. The more kids whites have, the more pro-Bush they get.

I'll focus primarily upon non-Hispanic Caucasians, who overall voted for Bush 58-41 (up from 54-43 in 2000), in part because they are doing most of the arguing over the meaning of the red-blue division. The reasons blacks vote Democratic are obvious, and other ethnic voting blocs are smaller. Whites remain the 800-pound gorilla of ethnic electoral groups, accounting for over three out of every four votes.

The single most useful and understandable birthrate measure is the "total fertility rate." This estimates, based on recent births, how many children the average woman currently in her childbearing years will end up with. The federal National Center for Health Statistics reported that in 2002 the average white woman was giving birth at a pace consistent with having 1.83 babies during her lifetime, or 13 percent below the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman. This below-replacement level has not changed dramatically in three decades.

States, however, differ significantly in white fertility. The most fecund whites are in heavily Mormon Utah, which, not coincidentally, was the only state where Bush received over 70 percent. White women average 2.45 babies in Utah compared to merely 1.11 babies in Washington D.C., where Bush earned but 9 percent. The three New England states where Bush won less than 40 percent -- Massachusetts, Vermont, and Rhode Island -- comprise three of the four states with the lowest white birth rates, with little Rhode Island dipping below 1.5 babies per woman.

Bush carried the 19 states with the highest white fertility (just as he did in 2000), and 25 out of the top 26, with highly unionized Michigan being the one blue exception to the rule. (The least prolific red states are West Virginia, North Dakota, and Florida.)

In sharp contrast, Kerry won the 16 states at the bottom of the list, with the Democrats' anchor states of California (1.65) and New York (1.72) having quite infertile whites.


I've read elsewhere that mothers who have children tend to take a turn toward the right in their politics after the birth. Its interesting to see that the more children parents have the more conservative they become.

I wonder if this trend holds true in minority demographics as well.

Comments

Avatar for Andrew

Its interesting, but I’m wondering if the amount of babies born is a correlation of political leaning rather than a causation.  Studies have shown that as wealth increases, birth rate decreases.  Many of the states that voted Democrat have a large population of wealthier citizens as well as an expanding job markets.  So lets pretend that its 100% true that the more money you make, the fewer children you have.  So do Republicans in red states vote conservative due to the amount of children they have, or the amount of money the have?  I don’t know the causation but there is definitely some correlation between both of them.

*Note: I’m not including inner-cities due to the fact that they are primarily populated by minorities and the article was about whites.

Andrew on November 29, 2004 at 01:12 pm
Avatar for Mr. Bowen

I wonder how much the author figured abortion into it all?  It’s damn difficult to raise good little Democrats if you keep aborting them first.

Yet another example of unintended consequences and Democrat shortsightedness.

Mr. Bowen on November 29, 2004 at 08:11 pm
Avatar for Andrew

Mr Bowen,
While abortion does play a factor in those numbers, its not a huge difference.  The state with the highest abortion rate, California, would go from a birth rate of 1.65 to 1.72 without abortions.  While that difference may look high, keep in mind that California has the highest abortion rate so that number difference is the largest of any state.  A red state with a low abortion rate, Uath, would have their birth rate go from 2.45 to 2.47 without abortions (a very small difference).  While abortion definitely affects blue states more than red states.  These differences still do not account for the large birth rate gaps between red and blue states, though.

Andrew on November 29, 2004 at 10:12 pm
Avatar for Emily

I would like to know, though, whether the findings of The Baby Gap are true at the individual level.  That is: on an person-by-person basis, are those with more children more likely to vote Republican (taking into account their marital status)?  I’m not saying that the Baby Gap is wrong; I just think that individual-level stats to back it up would be helpful.

Emily on December 11, 2004 at 04:13 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.