The ACLU’s Free Speech Double Standards

Here’s an ACLU spokesmen commenting on a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding government whistleblowers (I posted on that ruling here):

“In an era of excessive government secrecy, the court has made it easier to engage in a government cover-up by discouraging internal whistle-blowing,” said Steven Shapiro, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union.

Now here’s some reporting on new standards the ACLU is thinking on imposing upon its board members:

A lawyer in the New York state attorney general’s office informally warned the American Civil Liberties Union that his office had concerns about proposed standards that would limit the group’s board members from speaking publicly about policies and internal operations, according to three board members.

Could it be that the ACLU is worried about loose-lipped board members divulging information that would undermine the group’s ability to obtain its objectives? Sort of like how loose-lipped government officials undermine our intelligence community’s ability to keep this country safe when they expose details of our anti-terror intelligence gathering programs to the media?
Hypocrisy, they name is ACLU.
(via John J. Miller)

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array JeremyB

    Sure, there’s a difference, and what the ACLU is doing might very well be legal. But it’s still hypocritical to engage in activities that you loudly denounce others (such as the government) for engaging in.

    Either transparency and openness to criticism are good, or they’re no, whether you are the U.S. Government or the ACLU.

  • jpe

    So you don’t understand that suppression of speech by the state and a contractual agreement between private parties are very different?

  • LoadTheMule

    But…but…but it’s different when they want to do it.

    Regards…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    So you don’t understand that suppression of speech by the state and a contractual agreement between private parties are very different?

    So you don’t understand that the suppression of a citizen’s free speech by the government is different from prosecuting a government employee for violating the confidentiality they agreed to when accepting their job?

    Using your way of thinking, the folks down at the IRS could tell everyone all about my financial information and get away with it since it’s their right to free speech and all.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development