Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, June 19, 2006

The ACLU’s Free Speech Double Standards

Here's an ACLU spokesmen commenting on a recent Supreme Court ruling regarding government whistleblowers (I posted on that ruling here):

"In an era of excessive government secrecy, the court has made it easier to engage in a government cover-up by discouraging internal whistle-blowing," said Steven Shapiro, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union.


Now here's some reporting on new standards the ACLU is thinking on imposing upon its board members:

A lawyer in the New York state attorney general's office informally warned the American Civil Liberties Union that his office had concerns about proposed standards that would limit the group's board members from speaking publicly about policies and internal operations, according to three board members.


Could it be that the ACLU is worried about loose-lipped board members divulging information that would undermine the group's ability to obtain its objectives? Sort of like how loose-lipped government officials undermine our intelligence community's ability to keep this country safe when they expose details of our anti-terror intelligence gathering programs to the media?

Hypocrisy, they name is ACLU.

(via John J. Miller)

Comments

Avatar for LoadTheMule

But...but...but it’s different when they want to do it.

Regards…

LoadTheMule on June 19, 2006 at 06:39 am
Avatar for jpe

So you don’t understand that suppression of speech by the state and a contractual agreement between private parties are very different?

jpe on June 19, 2006 at 08:33 am
Avatar for JeremyB

Sure, there’s a difference, and what the ACLU is doing might very well be legal. But it’s still hypocritical to engage in activities that you loudly denounce others (such as the government) for engaging in.

Either transparency and openness to criticism are good, or they’re no, whether you are the U.S. Government or the ACLU.

JeremyB on June 19, 2006 at 09:37 am
Rob
Rob
19171 comments
Send a private message

So you don’t understand that suppression of speech by the state and a contractual agreement between private parties are very different?

So you don’t understand that the suppression of a citizen’s free speech by the government is different from prosecuting a government employee for violating the confidentiality they agreed to when accepting their job?

Using your way of thinking, the folks down at the IRS could tell everyone all about my financial information and get away with it since it’s their right to free speech and all.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on June 19, 2006 at 09:53 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.