Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

The Absurdity Of The University Of Minnesota’s Refusal To Play “Fighting Sioux” Teams

Katherine Kersten, writing in the Minneapolis Star Tribue:

An Associated Press story in the Star Tribune reported that a U of M policy discouraging the school’s athletic teams from competing against UND in any sport except hockey “will stand.” The U’s Advisory Committee on Athletics had said in February that it would reconsider the policy, according to the AP. But Douglas Hartmann, the committee’s chairman, “now says that won’t happen.”

The Gophers will continue to play other teams with Indian names. In November, the men’s basketball team will take on the Central Michigan Chippewas and the Florida State Seminoles. (FSU’s mascot is a white guy in full war paint who brandishes a spear on horseback.) In December, the Gophers women’s basketball team will meet the Utah Utes.

These schools, unlike UND, have received the blessing of the NCAA to keep their Indian team names.

North Dakotans may find the U of M’s policy on the Fighting Sioux surprising. They probably just don’t understand how enlightened folks make decisions on such matters. UND’s fans likely think it’s enough that players and the community are inspired by the tradition of the Fighting Sioux name, which has a 75-year history, many Indian supporters and a beautiful logo of a proud Sioux warrior designed by an Indian artist.

But then, you’d expect that hokey “school spirit” stuff from simple country folk whose idea of progress involves improving sugar beet yields.

Just so you have this straight, the “principled” stand the University of Minnesota is taking on the University of North Dakota’s nickname means that they won’t be playing any “Fighting Sioux” teams (except the hockey team, since that’s a Division 1 team and UofM makes a lot of money off that rivalry), but they will be playing other teams with Indian nicknames since the NCAA has decided (in some arbitrary and completely unfathomable fashion) that those Indian nicknames aren’t offensive.

Makes perfect sense, right?

One wonders if the NCAA hasn’t decided to execute its no Indian nicknames policy so harshly on UND as a way of sitting on the fence a bit on the issue.  After all, their zeal in going after UND can be used to mask their leniency with bigger-market teams that make the NCAA more money like the Florida Seminoles, etc.

Comments

Avatar for Roger Fraley

Are you creating a new word or did you mis-spell ‘Absurdity’? We have pretty much always honored the Indian warriors and it’s reflected in choices of names for school teams.

Roger Fraley on October 16, 2007 at 07:14 am
Rob
Rob
17408 comments
Send a private message

It was a typo, sorry.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 16, 2007 at 07:36 am

OK, I am the first to admit I may be showing some dumb blondness here but for the life of me I don’t understand this.
U of M refuses competition with UND because of the schools (alleged)unethical mascot, EXCEPT when it comes to hockey, then it’s a politically correct mascot?
Another question I have is, since when is it a dishonor to be a mascot or logo of a school. In my eyes this is an honor to be chosen for. My elementary school we were “The Braves”, my jr high we were “The Warriors”, and in high school we were “The Tomahawks”. We still have those mascots and I can only hope the local Native Indians will fight for the right to retain those mascots in honor of their proud heritage. I for one, will stand right along side of them and help save what lil’ acknowledgment is left of our Native Americans (besides casinos and smoke shacks)
Get Real, U of M! If you were serious about this heartfelt ethical display on your part you would cease any hockey action also. U of M’s action of only partially banning a mascot is nothing but a slap in the face to Native American Indians and they should be ashamed.


flag002.gif washC.gif

Anna on October 16, 2007 at 08:25 am

I’m all for schools using Native Americans as their team names.  That’s if they do it respectfully and in good taste. 

I don’t like the Atlanta Braves and their use of the “Tomahawk Chop” or the Florida State mascot, just some dude in war paint and a spear, those are pretty much a slap in the face towards the Native Americans they represent and are supposed to be honoring. 

As far as the U of M not wanting to play any teams from UND except for hockey and the big bucks is quite puzzling. 

They are saying it is not okay for UND to have their Fighting Sioux team mascot except when it brings in big bucks for hockey games. I don’t buy the U of M’s taking a principled stand for a second.

Creasy on October 16, 2007 at 10:12 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.