The Least Serious President in the History of the Republic™ Speaks at AIPAC, Again
Israel can sleep safely tonight! Barry has imposed sanctions on Iran!
The Least Serious President in the History of the Republic™ addressed an AIPAC Policy Conference in Washington today. (Candidate Obama addressed them in 2008.) A couple of things jumped out at me.
We also know how difficult that search for security can be, especially for a small nation like Israel in a tough neighborhood.
A “tough neighborhood”??? Excuse me, Mr. President, but Israel is a nation under siege from its enemies. Chicago has rough neighborhoods, Israel is in a war zone.
“You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Here in the U.S., we’ve imposed the toughest sanctions ever on the Iranian regime.”
Tough sanctions against Iran? How’d that work out for us against Saddam Hussein in Iraq?
Did tough sanctions bring down his regime or bring about peace in the region or extinguish his desire to rebuild his WMD capabilities? Israel can sleep safely tonight! Barry has imposed sanctions! /sarcasm
“…a new generation of Arabs is reshaping the region.”
Oh, you mean like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, after you were instrumental in the removal of Mubarak, who are avowedly hostile to Israel? And whatever factions are rebelling in Libya, about whose ideologies and intentions towards Israel you haven’t a clue?
So, let me see…we have turmoil in Egypt, Syria, and Libya, where you just started a military action. We have shooting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and you sent a military mission into Pakistan, without the knowledge or permission of their government, and now you want to impose your will on our lone democratic ally in the Middle East, because…you needed to draw attention away from your golf outings??
“The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps”
Here’s where you plan goes off the rails, Mr. President. Take the city of Jerusalem, the city of David, the capitol of Israel. Your proposal not only has it jutting like a peninsula into what would then be another country, but the old lines transect Jerusalem. Which part of Jerusalem do you envision either side would “mutually agree” to give up? On what would you base that belief? Certainly not on the last 44 years of history! And you have publicly stated that Jerusalem “must remain undivided”. Who mutually agreed to that swap, Mr. President?
In the end, you have a pretty speech, which is only as dependable as the man who gives it. Too often in the past, Obama’s promises have come with an expiration date. Why should we believe these are any different? And why should the nation of Israel risk its security and existence based on your words, Mr. Obama?
Cross posted at Proof PositiveTags: Barack Obama, International Scene, Politics