“Terrorist Guns”

Share |

What was this guy thinking?

Outdoor Life magazine has fired him. The Outdoor Channel has suspended his “Jim Zumbo Outdoors” TV show. Remington Arms and other companies have withdrawn their sponsorship. The National Rifle Association has denounced him. A career built over four decades apparently ended in the time it took to click the “Send” button on a computer – almost as quickly as a speeding bullet flies.

The Blog post that led to this:

“I must be living in a vacuum,” he wrote. “The guides on our hunt tell me that the use of AR (-15) and AK (-47) rifles have a rapidly growing following among hunters, especially prairie dog hunters. I had no clue. Only once in my life have I ever seen anyone using one of these firearms.
“I call them ‘assault’ rifles, which may upset some people. Excuse me, maybe I’m a traditionalist, but I see no place for these weapons among our hunting fraternity. I’ll go so far as to call them ‘terrorist’ rifles. To most of the public, an assault rifle is a terrifying thing. Let’s divorce ourselves from them. I say game departments should ban them from the prairies and woods.”

Really that’s absolutely stupid. If the hunt is legal with the caliber what’s wrong with hunting with a gun that looks a bit different than what Zumbo chooses. An AK-47 7.62 x 39 is pretty much similar to a 30-30. Is a deer going to suffer because he was shot with a bullet from a gun that Zumbo considers ugly?
There is also plenty of game that is legal to take with a 223. So is someone supposed to forgo the accuracy and user friendliness of the AR-15 just because it doesn’t have a fake wood stock?
There are literally millions of AK-47 and AR-15 owners in this country. Zumbo said they were terrorist weapons. Apparently he thinks I am a terrorist. I might be a poor terrorist but that’s about all you can hang on me.
Apparently Zumbo is terrified of low-powered firearms that he considers ugly. And since he doesn’t like them he thinks they ought to be banned, not for their intrinsic use as a hunting firearm, but because of their appearance.
I hate to see someone fired for speaking their mind. I would have rather that the viewers that object quit watching him. But in this case the guy has painted himself so far in a corner that losing his show was inevitable.

Tags:

«
»

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

3 Responses to ““Terrorist Guns””

  1. jon spencer on March 20th, 2007 at 5:14 am

    This issue is over and done with.
    Read SaysUncle’s posts here, http://www.saysuncle.com/index.php?s=zumbo
    Thanks
    J-H.S.

  2. markm on March 19th, 2007 at 11:33 pm

    Goes to show ya that even the “TV show hunters” are more fluff than substance. I’ve seen his show and I was less than impressed by his hunting methods.

    What a stupid thing to say.

  3. electnixon on March 20th, 2007 at 6:07 am

    This is old news and he apologized, but his original statements are typical of uneducated cityfolk who think they know what they’re talking about. This is the exact type of ignorance that the Clinton ‘assault rifle’ ban preyed upon. Anyone who knew anything about these realized that not only was it unreasonable, it also practically zero effect other that causing a few modifications to be made to civilian variants.

    The AR-15 is the only rifle that my wife will use for deer hunting due to it’s light carry weight, ease of use, and very low recoil (I’m still on the fence on whether a .223 is too small for midwest deer, ours are a lot bigger than the dog-sized ones in Florida).

    A lot of cityfolk think that “assault” weapons are significantly higher powered than hunting rifles, which is almost never the case.

Create a SAB Readerblog

Help Recall Kent Conrad

Rob's Articles At:

Events

Have an event you'd like listed? Email rob@sayanythingblog.com.

Recent Comments