Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, October 20, 2008


Tax Foundation: Measure Two In North Dakota Would Improve The State’s Tax Environment

Via emailed press release from Americans for Prosperity.

BISMARCK, ND – The non-partisan, non-profit Tax Foundation today released a report indicating that Measure #2 will improve North Dakota’s overall competitiveness in regional and national rankings. 

According to the Tax Foundation’s report, implementation of Measure #2 will improve North Dakota’s Individual Income Tax Ranking from 35th to 17th, and the Corporate Income Tax Ranking from 30th to 19th, with the overall ranking improving from 30th to 24th.

The Tax Foundation’s rankings take into account the application of individual income tax rates on sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S-corporations.  Measure #2 on the North Dakota state election ballot would reduce the state individual income tax by 50% and the state corporate income tax by 15%.

Here’s a link to the Tax Foundation analysis.

Shocking, isn’t it?  The idea that cutting taxes might help attract more businesses and more jobs to the state?

Meanwhile, the powers-that-be in the state think the best way to attract jobs and businesses to North Dakota is to keep taxes high to fund “economic development” projects that have a spotty record at best (see: Alien Technology in Fargo, among others).

Update: From the Tax Foundation directly:

According to the Tax Foundation’s State Business Tax Climate Index, North Dakota’s tax system is about middle-of-the-pack both nationally and regionally. But when nearby states offer more inviting tax climates, capital, entrepreneurs and workers are likely to flow that way. Some anecdotal evidence suggests that this is happening to North Dakota. Measure 2 could improve North Dakota’s ability to keep and attract jobs and investment.

The Tax Foundation takes no position on what the optimal amount of government spending is, but North Dakota has had several years of strong growth in tax revenues and that suggests that Measure 2 can be afforded. Strengthening this observation is the example of neighboring South Dakota, which has only one of the three major taxes. North Dakota should be especially careful about ratcheting up government spending permanently, which could store up trouble for the future. The state should also be warned against using the surplus for economic development subsidies or one-time rebates, both of which usually cover up a broken tax system.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

North Dakota isn’t interested in any business that isn’t subsidized by the taxpayers.148bhs.jpg


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on October 20, 2008 at 06:55 pm

Kevin’s got that right.  Hoeven wants to tax all of the viable businesses to death while giving the proceeds to fly by night operators that are here today, gone tomorrow.

The reason is that Hoeven’s ego wants to take credit for everything in the state.  After all Hoeven’s already taking credit for the oil industry boom that’s going on.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 20, 2008 at 07:00 pm

By the way this study puts the lie to the talking points that ND has the lowest tax rate out there.

I love how they mislead us by saying of states with an income tax ND’s rate is low.  As if we are to ignore (instead of emulating) states with no income tax.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 20, 2008 at 07:01 pm

The reason is that Hoeven’s ego wants to take credit for everything in the state.

Dorgan operates the same way. At least he’s not foolish enough to masquerade as a Republican.148bhs.jpg


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on October 20, 2008 at 07:08 pm

Dorgan’s got no problems lying but I don’t think he’d try getting away with blowing another $300 million on education and calling it “property tax relief.”

That takes a special type of confidence man to do that.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 20, 2008 at 07:18 pm

Byron’s too busy chasing down those evil, “boogie men” oil speculaters.2rwu8hs.jpg


No Free Lunch
25i20w9.jpg

Kevin on October 20, 2008 at 07:23 pm

I could help him with that.  They live between the Tooth Fairy and the Leprachaun’s House in the Land Called Honalee.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 20, 2008 at 07:29 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.