Tax And Spend: Hoeven Announces Plans For A 26% Increase In Government Spending

Which, if Hoeven’s budget were to be passed unchanged, would come on the heels of a 24% increase in spending from the last legislative session.

Hoeven’s budget requests $3.11 billion in state general fund spending from July 1, 2009, until June 30, 2011, an increase of 26.4 percent. North Dakota’s general fund is financed mostly by taxes on sales, income, energy, corporations, tobacco and gambling. Total spending, which includes federal funds, state gasoline tax collections, and other revenues, would rise 19 percent, to $7.71 billion.

Hoeven attempts to hide behind the “one time spending” canard, suggesting that his budget-busting increase is ok because it all goes to one-time expenditures. Of course, when our political leaders spend everything in site year after year after year that “one time spending” excuse because cold comfort, doesn’t it?
Also, take a look at the Governor’s budget in spreadsheet format. Each agency in the state made a budget request to Governor Hoeven, and Hoeven budgeted an amount greater than what the agency requested almost across the board. And all those additional increases Hoeven is budgeting for?
He’s calling them “one time spending.” Which is baloney. If you increase spending on an agency that is on going spending. Because you can bet that agency would be seeing any spending cuts. At least not under John Hoeven.
Also, notice that while Hoeven is ratcheting up spending to $3.11 billion for the next two years the state general fund is only expected to take in about $2.78 billion in revenue. He wants to fund his overspending on proceeds from increased oil tax collections:

Hoeven estimates North Dakota’s general fund will collect $2.78 billion in revenues over two years. He is recommending that the Legislature spend $2.75 billion for ongoing programs, and $357.2 million on building and road repairs and other one-time projects. Most of the $357.2 million would come from a state trust fund for surplus oil tax collections.

Of course, the problem with this is that oil has fallen to under $40/barrel. If it stays there for any length of time that’s going to have a significant impact on oil tax revenues in the state. Hoeven is gambling on oil tax revenues staying high, and that’s a dangerous game to be playing as the rest of the country sinks into a recession.
And even with the economic future of the state and the country looking a bit shaky, Hoeven wants to pretty much spend every dollar available to him:

Budget documents say North Dakota’s budget surplus should be $1.265 billion when the state’s current two-year budget period ends June 30. The figure includes an estimated $392 million general fund balance; a $311 million rainy-day fund; and $562 million in surplus oil taxes.
Hoeven wants to use $657 million of the surplus during the 2009-11 budget period, including $300 million to finance school property tax reductions and $357 million for an assortment of one-time projects.

Hoeven talks about property tax reductions, but spending state money to bailout exorbitant local spending and thus obliquely lowering property taxes (if localities can be trusted to lower property taxes, which they can’t be) is hardly “property tax reductions.” It’s a shell game aimed at making Hoeven look like a tax cutter even when he isn’t really one.
All in all, the Governor’s budget is horrendous. If I had to say one positive thing about it I’d say that it’s ok that we’re going to invest in infrastructure (roads and bridges) given how much more wear and tear we’re seeing on infrastructure due to increased economic activity (especially in and around the oil fields), but that’s cold comfort given the amount of irresponsible spending the rest of this budget entails.
But I’m quite certain the powers that be will just rubber stamp it. The media in the state will go along with it (because most of the media outlets are owned by people who get their pockets lined by Hoeven’s “economic development” nonsense). And the taxpayers will, once again, get hosed.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array sc

    Remember, Hooven was a democrat once.

  • Hungry Bear

    and a Lt. on the Reno Sheriff’s Department.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    When I moved back to ND in 1982, I saw the same thing happening.
    The state was spending oil revenue like it would be coming in at the same rate in perpetuity.

    Exactly, I did a post about that prior to the election. The aftermath to that was that the legislature passed at least five sales tax increases (counting broadening the tax base) and many other tax increases.

    John Hoeven is so completely irresponsible. If the North Dakota media, specifically the Forum properties had any integrity he wouldn’t get away with this.

  • di butler

    I don’t know Hoeven, but he needs an updated hair cut and to ditch the stash! He looks Hitlerish. With 70′s hair.

  • di butler

    He does look like the Dangler!

  • Frank

    An interesting note on one-time spending: During the Budget Section meeting on December 3rd, OMB was reveiwing the format of appropriations bills to be used during the 2009 session. Even though the 2007 Legislative Assembly clearly indicated that one-time appropriations were not to be included in calculating an agency’s 2009 base budget, OMB’s appropriations bils included all 2007 one-time funding in each agency’s 2009 base funding amounts. Luckily, the Legislative Council staff caught this and is making OMB revise their appropriations bills to clearly separate one-time funding from ongoing funding.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    It seems that they sell us every year that they say that the budget isn’t that bad because of one-time spending. The next year they roll that into their base funding into their regular money and claim they aren’t getting that much more money.

    This is part of the Hoeven con game that’s going on.

  • Rusty

    For those folks who were bamboozled by the politicos [on both sides] into voting against Measure 1 and Measure 2 this last election under the guise of vague promises of property tax relief and the Guvmint having their hands tied by being forced to save some of the oil ‘windfall’ money and having to allow the taxpayers to keep more of their earnings, those of us who saw this coming can only say “Thanks…thanks a lot!”
    When I moved back to ND in 1982, I saw the same thing happening.
    The state was spending oil revenue like it would be coming in at the same rate in perpetuity.
    It has been reported in the media that ND is not in the same financial maelstrom as much of the rest of the country.
    At this rate it won’t be long…

  • Shinnob_nd

    I did take a gander at the spreadsheet. While working as a State Employee it was true that if they got funded an amount for example (mental health) and a outfit had money left over they would spend it on waste (thousands for new windows in a unused building). Funds allocated for home health in rural towns used for fixing bridges.

    We need to hold those responcible for this waste, more public awareness on spending and input. Our media reports mostly fluff. Its like North Dakota is filled with honest people includeing our politicians. Everyone has there hand in the cookie jar, then we are missinformed and fight among each other.

    True Conservitives should want and promote programs that empower the people of ND to be productive, self relient, education. Iv really seen none of this promoted by any politicians in ND.

    Very sad that in ND if your a disabled Vet, handicapped, so on they quietly sweep them away from the public into nurseing homes or medicare funded places. Taxpayers still foot this huge bill. Years behind the times while our neighbors offer programs to educate on being independent, working, less dependent, options that can keep people in there communities. If you end up disabled and from ND, be prepared, you will truly find the cure for hope.

    We have to stop voteing in peeps that dont serve actual North Dakotants. People have so much to offer in ND. Markets that empower locals who spend there money here.

    The article is correct in stateing that we cannot depend on tax income from oil, gambling. We have to invest in our people, more so also in the people of eastern ND, not outside biz bringing in low wage stuff either.

    Well I think I vented for the day, whhoooo

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin
  • Hungry Bear

    Sorry about the typo Jim Dangle

  • Hungry Bear

    I think you have the wrong picture again. That’s obviously Lt. Jim Danle of the Reno Sheriff’s Department.

    http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/reno_911/officers/lt_dangle/index.jhtml

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    ND needs a Taxpayers’ bill of Rights limiting spending increases to the rate of population increase plus the inflation rate. Up close to 60% in two years is way out of line.

  • Frank

    A question was asked in the posting about why agencies received a higher budget recommendation than was requested. Answer – Agencies don’t include salary increases in their budgets (except higher ed)so PART of the excess is for the executive compensation recommendation. For some agencies, such as the Department of Corrections, a much higher amount than requested is noted because the executive recommendation includes equity pay (above the average 5%) to address low salaries.

  • FlybyKnight

    I know it’s sad to have to say it, but 26% is actually a lot less than I was afraid it was going to be.

    Which is a cold comfort.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I’ve seen nothing but expansion of government, and efforts to make people more dependent on government.

    What’s even worse is that the main effort by John Hoeven has to make state government more expensive not to do anything that the people actually need.

    Heck, we still don’t have 24/7 coverage of the state’s highways. But some of the most overpaid sectors in the state are going to get a lot more overpaid.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    True Conservitives should want and promote programs that empower the people of ND to be productive, self relient, education. Iv really seen none of this promoted by any politicians in ND.

    Exactly.

    I’ve seen nothing but expansion of government, and efforts to make people more dependent on government.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    more public awareness on spending and input. Our media reports mostly fluff.

    Transparency is going to be a big issue in our upcoming Public Poilcy Institute event. At the very least we need to open the state’s checkbook so that taxpayers can search and see exactly where their money is going.

    And yes, the media needs to do more than just go along with whatever the politicians do. The journalists in this state, for the most part, aren’t a check on the state government. They’re cheerleaders for the state government.

    Up close to 60% in two years is way out of line.

    Indeed it is.

    And this is happening with “Republicans” at the helm, no less.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I know it’s sad to have to say it, but 26% is actually a lot less than I was afraid it was going to be.

    It’s still too much.

    I mean, there is necessary spending out there. I’m not saying that. But spending increases at every single state agency across the board? Spending every penny of the oil trust fund?

    This is unnecessary.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    LMAO.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development