T. Boone Pickens Coming To North Dakota

North Dakota Senator Byron Dorgan issued a press release about T. Boone Pickens, the “legendary” oil man who is currently hawking wind power with the same level of shameless promotion of a carnival barker, coming to Dorgan’s Great Plains Energy Expo and Showcase (a taxpayer-funded event that exists for the exclusive purpose of promoting the all-Democrat North Dakota Congressional delegation’s energy agenda).
Here’s an interesting way to look at this development: Dorgan hates the oil companies. He thinks the oil companies make excessive amounts of profits. He thinks those profits should be taken from the oil companies and given to the government. He, in general, doesn’t think the government should help the oil companies in any way.
Pickens, on the other hand, is an oil billionaire who stands to make billions more if the government invests in his wind energy plan. And since wind energy has never once in the history of the world been marketable in the energy markets without government subsidy, the investment Pickens is looking for is significant.
So answer me this: Why is Dorgan ok with promoting the interests of wind energy billionaires who want to dip further into the taxpayer’s pockets to fund their industry, but not ok with oil industry billionaires making their profits?

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://www.fileitunder.com/ Rob B.

    Here’s one for you.
    ‘Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.’ – Ronald Reagan

  • Bat One

    Pickens is well aware that Dorgan and his fellow Dems have it in for the oil companies and those affiliated with that industry.

    In other words, Pickens knows which way the wind is blowing!

    (Sorry!)

  • http://www.fileitunder.com/ Rob B.

    Let ask, additionally, what has Dorgan's stance on oil development in ND been? Where does he fall on ethanol, which competes with wind for subsidies. Why would wind provide additional labor when oil would not? Where would Dorgan fall on imminent domain used to condemn the acreage for electrical right of way?

    I bet you can find more inconsistencies in all of that.

    The sad truth is, he's typical of the other politicians in that they all have failed to provide leadership in forming a comprehensive energy strategy. Mostly because of politics and because we didn't need one when we had cheap oil.

  • http://Array imagine

    We have a windy state. It is an alternative NRG source.
    The cost of transmission lines is huge.
    Giving a subsidy is cheaper than having the state put in the lines (which is sad because he who owns the lines will enjoy the profits)

    I recall hearing from a potential wind investor that the cost of the transmission lines is something close to 100k per foot?..not sure if that is an accurate number but the investors I know backed away from investing in ND wind due to that cost….

  • http://www.fileitunder.com/ Rob B.

    I will say this, eventually transmission lines will be an issue just due to infrastructure degradation. However, the question of a national grid vs the smaller non-collective grids is one that deserves some strategic focus.

    Here in Texas, Ercot has pros and cons but at least we didn't have rolling blackouts. That's when "supply and demand" meets "supply and delivery."

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    Just follow the money.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Let ask, additionally, what has Dorgan's stance on oil development in ND been?

    He's for it, which means he's a terrible hypocrite. He hates the oil companies nationally, but when he's here at home where oil development is driving the booming economy he's just fine with them.

    We have a windy state. It is an alternative NRG source.
    The cost of transmission lines is huge.

    If wind were competitive with other sources of energy in the state (such as coal, which we already have, and nuclear power which we should be looking into) I'd say we should clear way the red tape so that transmission lines could be built. They are, after all, infrastructure.

    The problem is that wind has a lot of problems. It's much more expensive to produce than coal, natural gas or even nuclear energy. And it's not a constant energy supply. There's no way to store up wind energy so that it can continue to meet demand even during periods of low wind (which, interestingly enough, tend to happen during peak periods of demand such as when it's really hot or really cold).

    I don't have a problem with wind per se. I have a problem with politicians trying to shove wind down our throats.

    Which is also my objection to ethanol.

  • James

    What happens when the wind stops blowing and where do we get the energy then? I don't know about you but there aren't enough JackAsses is the world that will make up for this issue.

    Wait a minute, there are plenty of us peons that won't have a dime or a job left after this is shoved down our throats, so there you go, this must be where all those jobs are coming from.

    T. Boondogle has to know this so why is he pushing for this when we actually will still need 2 to 3 times the number of windmills proposed to produce the reliable amount of energy predicited?

    I can answer that, it all about the Benjamins baby!!!!

    "We cannot blow ourselves out of this situation." WJC

  • http://www.wethepeopleforum.com/forum/forums.asp golfmann

    Wouldn't the money involved to outfit Kansas, say with these contraptions be enough to build nuke reactors to service the whole midwest, working 24/7 and last 100 years?

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    Dorgan and his fellow travelers want the government to ration energy.
    They will decide who is worthy to get any.

  • imagine

    ND is an extremely windy state. There would be few days where harvesting wind NRG would not occur. In fact we have so much wind that there is additional expense to add additional gearing to the mills.

    I am a believer in wind NRG. Granted it is expensive to get set up and there will be costs to maintain the mills, but the wind is free and it is clean and it is a 'non- depleting' resource. We should have been looking at wind and solar more deeply these past 40 years. If we had spread the cost over that length of time, we very well may have been in a different place today.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Pickens is well aware that Dorgan and his fellow Dems have it in for the oil companies and those affiliated with that industry.

    In other words, Pickens knows which way the wind is blowing!

    What the dems don't realize is T Boone Pickens wants to drill as well. This wind energy is most costly than it is good.

  • Henry

    No one has investigated the effect of removing megawatts of energy from prevailing winds in the various states that Boondoggle wants the rate payers to subsidize his latest money making scheme that include tax rebates (more ratepayer money).

    Removing this much energy from the wind may have an unforeseen effect on the weather patterns that are governed by wind.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development