Sweden Is Trying To Outlaw Gender Differences

1206572112160208723johnny_automatic_NPS_map_pictographs_part_67.svg.med

Stamping out differences and individuality in the name of diversity (via Robert Wargas):

“In an effort to support gender neutrality, Sweden recently added a gender-neutral pronoun, ‘hen,’ to the country’s National Encyclopedia. Slate reports that several preschools in Sweden have stopped making references to the gender of their students. Instead of calling children ‘boys and girls,’ teachers are referring to students as ‘buddies.’ One school even stopped allowing free playtime during the day because stereotypical gender patterns are born and cemented. In free play there is hierarchy, exclusion, and the seed to bullying.’ And the country just published its first gender-neutral children’s book, ‘Kivi och Monsterhund.’“

Conservatives talk a lot about how socialists want to stamp out individualism, but who knew the socialists would take it so far? To the point where they’re trying to obfuscate actual gender differences.

The idea that children can’t even be allowed to play freely lest they undermine the government’s notions about appropriate social behavior is downright chilling. But this is where we at. Individualism must be destroyed because if individuals are allowed to behave freely they might not adhere to certain notions about proper society the powers-that-be wish to implement.

In other words, you can’t just be your own person.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters. He writes a weekly column for several North Dakota newspapers, and also serves as a policy fellow for the North Dakota Policy Council.

Related posts

  • Neiman

    The Soviets and Red Chinese governments knew going in that individuality, and opposition to the State Religion (atheism) was contrary to peace and treasonous. I have read many true stories of people that were tortured and killed because they believed in individual liberty, in free thoughts and the right to express them. Socialism, we call it Progressive Liberalism, as promoted by the Democrats, is a movement that leads inevitably to full communism and the end of all free speech, freedom of thought cannot be allowed.

    • Jay

      Hey, Ayatollah Neiman, maybe you should be intellectually honest and mention all the theocracies that have engaged in persecution and mass murder. The Catholic Church during the Middle Ages was a huge offender in this regard, and your own Bible has God order Joshua to commit genocide against the Canaanites for the horrible crime of existing. Even here in what would later be the U.S., innocent girls died because of religious fanatics like you during the Salem witch trials. Thankfully Christianity is less likely to be responsible for oppression and religion-based atrocities currently though Islam has been happy to assume the sanguinary mantle of religious barbarism. The leftwingers broadly and Dems specifically are great offenders in the war on individualism, but I fail to see how you and your gaggle of Big Brother-worshipping socons are much better.

      • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

        Be nice to Neiman, Jay. He does, after all, represent half the gop base.
        You’re gop too, arentcha, Jay?

        • Jay

          Actually, no, I’m a Libertarian. I used to be GOP but switched registration in 2006 because I was too disgusted to be be in the same party with inarticulate big-spending moron the GOP had in the White House at the time. I sat out the presidential part of 2008 because I had a choice between Bush II and Obama, but I’ll be voting GOP again this year because Republicans grew some brains nominated Romney over Santorum. Had Darth Santorum won the presidential nod, I would have had to vote for Obama over him. Thankfully I don’t have to do that now.

          • thevoiceofreason

            There is no difference between Obama and Romney. I don’t understand your stance considering you’re libertarian. Gary Johnson would be better than either of these “moderates.”

          • Onslaught1066

             Which is why Jay the liberaltarian can now pretend to have a choice, and he can tell all his GOP neighbors, that he mooches off of, that he didn’t vote for Dumb-O.

            Pretty slick for an intellectually dishonest democrat, huh?

          • Jay

            Intellectually dishonest Democrat, huh? Wow. I’ve never been called that before. I guess all those Republicans I contributed to in 2010–Kristi Noem, Jamie Herrera, Renee Ellmers, Richard Burr, Tim Scott, Justin Simmons, et al–need more “intellectually dishonest Democrats” like me to keep opening up their checkbooks in the future then if they want to keep winning.

          • Onslaught1066

             “Libertarian” is just the latest dodge to avoid being tarred with the liberal/progressive brush, so all your self-serving BS aside “intellectually dishonest democrat” sums it up perfectly.

            But, whatever helps you sleep at night… I suppose.

          • Jay

            If Gary Johnson had a chance, I’d vote for him. He hasn’t one. My stance is anyone but Obama as long as it’s not Santorum. Romney isn’t a lock to win, but he has a shot and isn’t from the same wing of the GOP as Ayatollah Neiman and the Moral Police. Ergo, Romney’s my pick.

          • Salydrc

            Even though I think Santorum went over the line, and I was never for Santorum, I think you ought to change your name. Here are some options – Adolf Hitler, Herman Goering, Heinrich Himmler, Joachim Von Ribbentrop, Josef Mengele, Karl Barth – cause I am sure you are 100 percent in line with them.

            I am also for freedom of religion BTW – including any peaceful Muslim, and for beer.

            We have technologies now that Hitler and Stalin would have killed for, and I think people ought to “civically” not religiously speak out against it in the public fear. I think the blue state general white public is secular Hitler, yet I think Santorum was wrong, and I do not favor a religious state.

      • Neiman

        First, please get your facts straight about the Salem Witch trials: In Colonial America, witchcraft was a felony (a crime) punishable by
        death by hanging. However, in Europe witchcraft was considered heresy (a
        crime against the church itself) and punishable by burning at the
        stake. So the people of Salem hung Nineteen people and as many as
        thirteen people may have died in prison. I don’t think a maximum of nine hung and 13 dead by other causes compares very badly against the 50+ million babies you and your liberal allies have murdered. Not that I agree even with the 31 deaths, but they would not even register statistically, compared to your murders.

        Next, while admittedly and most regrettably religious zealots, falsely using Jesus dear Name have committed many terrible crimes over the many centuries and a small number still do so today; if you read the New Testament, you would discover not one word therein of justification for any of these crimes. So, anyone thus engaged were/are acting outside the faith and will answer to God.

        You are outside the faith and so it is absolutely impossible for you to be made to understand Scripture at all, let alone the Old Testament. Just let me say only that when God sent His people out and on rare occasion when He acted directly, it was against those people outside of Israel that had rejected God, representing a great danger of spiritual pollution and everlasting punishing to His Chosen people, a people that were used by Him for the Salvation of all mankind and for the faithful preservation of His Holy Word.

        It is silly and false of you to accuse me of being an Ayatollah without clear justification, which you have refused to defend herein.

        It is likewise silly and false to accuse me of believing in a Big Brother, intrusive government as my often defended views are in exact proportion to the Founding Fathers. You only object to any laws as you want your drugs and relations with prostitutes to be legal, so you won’t fear arrest. I have often defended limited government, but unlike you, to me that does not mean that we as a “people,” you know those “of, by and for the people” that you seem to hate, we cannot agree to place reasonable restraints on your decadent, licentious lusts when they cause danger to me or my loved ones.

        You may tell your brother Gay Bob, in rejection of his lies below, which I have often disproved that, I am a conservative by political ideology, but I have never been a member of the GOP or for that matter never a Democrat.

        • Jay

          Apparently I hit the target dead center to get Ayatollah Neiman frothing at the mouth like this. For the record, Ayatollah, I was Catholic till last year when I had the epiphany that it’s cute when children have invisible friends but creepy when adults do. It’s really liberating to have real friends and not lie to myself about how some tyrant in the sky supposedly loves me.

          • Neiman

            You still have not supported the silly Ayatollah claim, you just keep repeating it because . . . well you are far too intellectually handicapped to deal in facts. More proof you are really a Democrat – all childish emotions.

            Frothing at the mouth? You mean rationally, in detail, refuting each of your lies, that is frothing? Then I guess to you, anyone with a brain that, defends their beliefs, are all “frothing?”

            So you were a cafeteria Catholic and hated the rules, well … like any rebellious child that cannot suffer any discipline in your life, it explains your debauched state of mind and your lust after things just like a child set free in a candy store. Well, there is hope, you might still grow up some day.

            If I gave you a billion dollars as a free gift, gave you a beautiful pacific island with all your heart’s desires on it and only required that you refrain from doing one small thing as a condition, would that make me a tyrant? Or, would you demand I give it to you and shut the hell up and leave you alone or you would refuse it? If a parent gives you their unconditional love and acceptance, but asks you to do certain things and gives you the means to do them, would they by tyrants? Or, would you reject their love and act hateful towards them, is that how you would react to their love?

            You need desperately to grow up and become a man,or you will live a failed, miserable life as a child. It is up to you of course, but pardon me if I observe such rebellion is akin to cutting off your nose just to spite your face or pissing into the wind, all things a child would do, but pretty stupid.

          • $8194357

            Sad what “religion” does to a soul..

            Try “Salvation”…

            A real relationship with the “Living Jesus”….

            Like the difference from a pop corn fart to
            A catagory five hurricane…

            God Bless now, Hear?

      • Salydrc

        Jay, why don’t you compare the numbers of the Salem witch trials and crusades versus the big seven atheists – Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Robbespierre, Kim Jong Il and Mengistu. There is a HUGE number discrepency.

        • 2hotel9

          Really? Four women wrongly executed is equivalent to a couple hundred million innocent people murdered in the name of your anti-human ideology. OK, leftard, whatever.

  • Jane

    This was inevitable, and it’s not over yet.  We are reaping what we have sewn.

  • Jay

    This is what you get when the Marxists run a country. What a joke the Left is trying to make of everything.

  • mickey_moussaoui

    Feminazi’s are “hens”, big time. Ever hear a bunch of them together in a room? It sounds just like a hen house.

    Sweden is fucked up, IMO.

    Why do people think we all have to be homoginized into one group as if it makes anything better? Isn’t “diversity” supposed to be the goal of these freaks? You can’t have it both ways. Just STFU and let people be people for cripes sake. I’d rather deal with leftists than expect them to be part of my social group.

  • Econwarrior

    Those wacky Euros are, once again, showing us the true intent of liberalism.

  • awfulorv

    I’ll believe it’s working when the gals pay for 51% of evenings out, it’ll never happen. I don’t care how ugly a women is, they all think they’ve got something precious down there, and demand payment for it’s use.

    • ndoldman

      I don’t think it has any thing to do with looks rather than the natural desire to reproduce  

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Mollet/528523868 Jonathan Mollet

    So this confuses me. Don’t we already have genderless pronouns that do the same thing with the words “they” “you” “their” and “themself”? How is this any different? 

    The way that it seems to be intended for use is different potentially, but having a genderless pronoun does make sense.

  • 2hotel9

    The best of Sweden ran down the a$$ crack of Norway 400 years ago.

  • yy4u2

    Fact, coincidence, causation…http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_Sweden

    When the moral fabric of common sense is cut away…

  • Thresherman

    I recall a Baby Blues cartoon where the dad came home and proudly proclaimed that he had found “gender neutral” toys fo the the kids, a boy and a girl.  So he gave them the “gender neutral” toys and the girl named hers “Happy Rainbow Sunshine” and the boy named his “Twuck”.  The girl went off dancing and spinning with hers while the boy drove his though a mud puddle while mouthing engine noises.

    Some things are just hard wired.

    • Thresherman

      Oh, the “gender nuetral” toys were Teddy Bears.

  • $8194357

    (But this is where we at.)
    This is where they want us..
    .
    Cultural inversion of Judeo/Christian western society…

    Quote:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphous_perversity

    Polymorphous perversity is a psychoanalytic term for human ability to gain sexual gratification outside socially normative sexual behaviors. Sigmund Freud used this term to describe the normal sexual disposition of humans from infancy to about age five

    Freud’s theory

    Freud theorized that humans are born with unfocused sexual libidinal drives, deriving sexual pleasure from any part of the body. The objects and modes of sexual satisfaction are multifarious, directed at every object that might provide pleasure. Polymorphous perverse sexuality continues from infancy through about age five, progressing through three distinct developmental stages: the oral stage, anal stage, and phallic stage. Only in subsequent developmental stages do children learn to constrain sexual drives to socially accepted norms, culminating in adult heterosexual behavior focused on the genitals and reproduction.

    Freud taught that during this stage of undifferentiated impulse for sexual pleasure, incestuous and bisexual urges are normal. Lacking knowledge that certain modes of gratification are forbidden, the polymorphously perverse child seeks sexual gratification wherever it occurs. In the earliest phase, the oral phase, the child forms a libidinal bond with the mother via sexual pleasure gained from sucking the breast.

    For Freud, “perversion” is a non-judgmental term. He used it to designate behavior outside socially acceptable norms.
    End quote

    Marxist public indoctrination centers known as “the public school system” been workin overtime on this one…

    Heck Califorinia been forcing unisex bathroom laws for a long time already as well..

    If gay bob wants to be branded as normal so must every gender identity crisis cause
    Freuds lemmings could ever dream up must as well…

    This is corpes my dead partner…
    We been together now since he/she died two years ago now….

    Polymorphus perversity or use of PC “Cultural Terrorisms” war on the Biblical Rule of Law….

    • ellinas1

      Sevenpoint62 says:”Heck Califorinia been forcing unisex bathroom laws for a long time already as well..”

      I ellinas1 say to my dear friend 7.62:
      Someone has been giving you false information.

      • Econwarrior

        You’re the dispenser of false information here, liar.

      • $8194357

        Over 20 years ago E…

        Parent California company comes in to soviet satelite in ND with “explansion plans”..
        Using California law and code to build our expansion needed three seperate bathrooms…

        Male
        Female
        Genderless unisex..

        We said no..Its not required in ND…

        Two years ago…
        ND plant went gender neutral on benifits provided to significant others to avoid the lawsuit threatened…

        We are “behind the times” up here..
        California and Federal Laws are changinging that “fast”…

        My “false information”?
        Not so false, E…

  • Flamejob5
  • $141015

    Just listened to   http://www.coasttocoastam.com/   last night for 3 hours about the Socialist State of Sweden. Joining John B. Wells, the host of Red Ice Radio in Sweden, was Henrick Palmgren, This article fits the picture of Sweden.

  • Camsaure

    Just look at the reversed gender person the Dems are trying to run for ND Gov.

  • Lianne

    Hen? As in hen being female and rooster being male?  Is there something missing in the translation?  I have always used the word ‘shim’ myself, but of course, in that case the gender is in question!

  • Salydrc

    I like being a woman, I am not a man, yet I think there need to be protections for women too. Many women are abused and killed the world over, and many women have to be the breadwinner in a family. Thus being said, I am not better off than my grandmothers, and probably not than my mother.

Top