Surprise: Obama Wants Anti-Abortion Language In The Health Care Bill Changed

Pelosi cut a deal on abortion with Demcorats from red states to get them on board for her narrow victory in the House on Saturday. And as soon as the bill is out of the House? Well, everything changes of course.

President Obama said today that Congress needs to change abortion-related language in the health care bill passed by the House of Representatives this weekend.
“I laid out a very simple principle, which is this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill,” Obama said. “And we’re not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions.
Saying the bill cannot change the status quo regarding the ban on federally funding abortions, the President said “there are strong feelings on both sides” about an amendment passed on Saturday and added to the legislation, “and what that tells me is that there needs to be some more work before we get to the point where we’re not changing the status quo.”

And of course, by “work” he means the anti-abortion language needs to be stripped out. Which is going to be difficult. Not only is that going to create more hostility in the Senate where the chances of this bill seeing any progress before early next year are between slim and none, but should the Senate strip the abortion language out and pass its changes back to the House for approval Pelosi is going to have a tough time rallying the troops again with no deal-making possible on a straight up-or-down vote on the Senate’s changes.
What’s more, the timing is going to be bad. Asking on-the-fence Democrats who just voiced tepid support for this bill to support an even worse bill at the beginning of next year’s pivotal elections?
I don’t ever want to be accused of underestimate Nancy Pelosi’s arm-twisting skills, but that’s going to be a tough row to hoe.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-9974

    To bad Obama wasn’t aborted.

  • TheTodd (now with child!)

    “And of course, by “work” he means the anti-abortion language needs to be stripped out.”

    Of course!!!

    Why bother posting the article, if you’re just going to decide what Obama means anyway?

  • sayanything-48

    And as soon as the bill is out of the House? Well, everything changes of course.

    Might as well… No one has read it yet anyway.

  • JFH

    Uh, Todd, that’s what political blogs are all about, interpreting political events and speech. In fact isn’t it a GOOD thing that Rob quotes the actual language so that you might be able to dispute it?

    What do YOU think that the president meant by his statement? It is very vague and, IMHO, purposely so, because Obama can’t EVER say what he means so that he can back out of stance on ANYTHING when politically unpopular.

  • gary gulrud

    Obviously, Pants Afire wants to strip the ‘guarantee’ no public funds can be used(people wanting that insurance pay more) out. Only co-conspirators and the brain-dead fail to see the import.

    Dear Liar.um.Leader is veracity-challenged(and morally-impaired).

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development