Surprise: Chrysler Drops Electric Vehicles They Touted When They Were Seeking Bailouts

Conventional wisdom on the left had it that General Motors and Chrysler were insolvent because they spent too much time focusing on making the sort of gas-guzzling vehicles only stupid rubes in fly-over country like to drive and not enough time focusing on the small, socially conscious, environmentally friendly vehicles that liberals prefer.
Crippling labor contracts and burdensome government regulations and taxes that put them at a competitive disadvantage with their foreign competitors totally had nothing to do with it.
So when Chrysler and General Motors were bellying up to the federal trough to be slopped with buckets of taxpayer money they tried to appeal to that conventional wisdom by promoting all the wonderful, energy efficient vehicles they were going to produce.
But now that they got their money? Well, now those promises aren’t important any more.

If you believed all the talk from Chrysler about how our tax dollars would help finance its fast-track electric-vehicle future, you’re in for a big disappointment.
Chrysler has disbanded the engineering team that was trying to bring three electric models to market as a rush job, Automotive News reports today. Chrysler cited its devotion to electric vehicles as one of the key reasons why the Obama administration and Congress needed to give it $12.5 billion in bailout money, the News points out. …
The change of heart on electric vehicles has come under Fiat. At a marathon presentation of Chrysler’s five-year strategy, CEO Sergio Marchionne talked about just about everything on Chrysler’s plate last week except its earlier electric-car plans. With the group’s disbanding, Chrysler’s electric plans will be melded into Fiat’s. Marchionne is apparently no fan of electric power:
He says electrics will only make up 1% or 2% of Fiat sales by 2014 and that he doesn’t put a lot of faith in the technology until battery developments are pushed forward.
So, basically, despite government attempts to manipulate us into buying the sort of vehicles the politicians think we should be driving, the simple fact of the matter is that the market isn’t ready for electric vehicles yet.
This is why the government should stay out of private markets. Let the companies that can’t turn a profit fail to be succeeded by the companies who can.
Of course, that would mean letting the host bodies (General Motors and Chrysler) currently surviving on federal life support for the express purpose of keeping the union parasites attached to them die. But it would also mean no more burden for the taxpayers, and increased competition as other car companies spring in to fill the vacuum.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array jimmypop

    electric cars cost too much and suck too much to be viable. even liberals like algore dont drive them.

  • sayanything-6847

    This shouldn’t be surprising. Just another lie.

  • sayanything-342

    union employyes of GM should be forced to drive electric cars

  • sayanything-48

    I think we should force the FED to buy these for the offical car of the UN Ambassadors or VIP’s. Congress too…

  • sayanything-9974

    I am shocked, shocked I tell you. The Dem/Libs wrong again – who’d a thunk it. The politicians will soon be telling us that they need more money to bail out the auto industry (union cronys). I will buy a Ford. Make room for the GM and Chrysler UAW members in the unemployment lines. How is that Hope and Change working for you. Oops – they killed the golden goose.

  • jimmypop

    union employyes of GM should be forced to drive electric cars

    they should be forced to BUY them.

  • sayanything-15427

    By the FED you mean the taxpayers…you realize that right?

  • jimmypop

    If you think about how most of the electricity in this country is generated it’s not too much of a stretch to say electric cars belch pollution in a similar way that the old steam locomotives did, both are getting their power from burning coal. And by the way, I love seeing a big black exhaust cloud behind an accelerating vehicle, blue tire smoke is cool too!

    this is one fact libbers literally have NO IDEA ABOUT. its sad. if you ask them where the power comes to make their $85 coffee they dont know. moving a 2,000 lb object takes ‘x’ amount of energy. regardless of where it comes from it takes ‘x’ amount of power. what we are doing is centralizing the pollution out of town. unless they start to pimp the idea of nuke plants all over, their theory of electric cars is nuts. even then, the battery waste and nuke waste will kill us.

  • spartacus

    If you think about how most of the electricity in this country is generated it’s not too much of a stretch to say electric cars belch pollution in a similar way that the old steam locomotives did, both are getting their power from burning coal. And by the way, I love seeing a big black exhaust cloud behind an accelerating vehicle, blue tire smoke is cool too!

  • alexandrs
  • alexandrs

    union employyes of GM should be forced to drive electric cars

    they should be forced to BUY them.

  • spartacus

    with cattle prods implanted in the seats?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development