Surprise: After Obama Hyped It, AMA May Have To Withdraw Backing Of Health Care Bill

Because a significant chunk of the group is upset about the endorsement.

The American Medical Association’s decision to endorse the House reform bill before its members had a chance to weigh in has dissenting factions threatening a “showdown” this weekend.
Opponents of the group’s endorsement are planning to introduce multiple resolutions to rescind or amend the AMA’s nod, according to an official whose doctor group opposes today’s endorsement.
“All is not happy in Denmark. There is a split within the ranks of the physician community,” the official said. “Clearly, the AMA does not represent the views of all physicians.”
In fact, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons announced their opposition to the House bill today. …
Some AMA members are upset that the association plowed forward with an endorsement ahead of their meeting this weekend in Houston. Also grumbling about the AMA’s endorsement are state medical associations in Ohio, Illinois, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and Florida, the official said.
Former AMA president Stormy Johnson is preparing a resolution to rescind the endorsement, sources said. And the surgeons are introducing a resolution that would call on the AMA to actively oppose any legislation that includes a public option or a temporary doc fix or that doesn’t include medical malpractice reform.

If anyone on the left tries to claim that the nation’s doctors are behind the efforts to make us all dependent on government health care you can call them a liar. Some doctors may be behind the bill, but certainly not all doctors.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Doug

    I’m a doctor and I am dead set against it. The government has already ruined healthcare in a hundred small ways, including making a medical career a joke…and they could have done SO much to help.

  • Swami

    I would think all doctors would support this, as it really is the ultimate answer to liability concerns.

    Public agencies don’t really worry about liability. The taxpayers get to pay for it all. No one ever tells a police department “I’m sorry guys, this one’s coming out of next year’s pay raise” when there is a 100 million dollar judgement against them. A Parks department employee can plant a hundred trees, have them all die within weeks, and isn’t on the hook for anything at all.

    Under the Obama system, private health care will be killed off. When its all public, massive damage awards to victims of malpractice will simply be paid for through more taxes. After all, the private sector worker, who gets his 6 holidays a year and works till he or she is 70, so the public sector worker can retire at 55 and get 12 holidays a year, can always afford to cough up a little more in taxes, right? Of course.

    Maybe that retirement age will just have to go up a year or two, that’s all.

    For the private sector, I mean.

  • http://fu.com/ robert108

    I always doubted that any significant number of doctors really want to be govt employees.

    They already know how much it costs them in time, money and freedom to deal with the amount of govt intrusion we already have.

  • sayanything-2

    Perhaps the morons at AMA should actually, you know, ask their members what they support. Theres a thought!

  • MarkSD

    And I guess AARP didn’t get enough of cut up membership cards in the mail. Or could it be because they sell insurance.

  • sayanything-7610

    Wouldn’t be the first time Barkey’s jumped the gun on who’s supporting what and when….

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development