Oh, and when it’s spoken, it’s a contraction: “could’ve”, short for “could have”.

But, then you lefties have trouble with your “shorts” don’t you? (I mean, they’ve been twisted in knots for eight years! ) Heh.

On one hand, I can’t imagine any sane mother choosing to have her child in Kenya instead of the U.S., especially in the sixties. I also know there’s a newspaper announcement of the birth. That said, the President-elect still has yet to produce the vault copy of his birth certificate. Is that really too darned much to ask? It’s not like any sane person is going to blame Mr. Obama for something that appears on the vault copy of his birth certificate!

(unless, of course, it undermines the life story that was a cornerstone of his campaigns)

I will be glad to show my birth certificate and have on numerous times. Only those with something to hide refuse to bring their past to the light.

Here’s a little more grist for the conspiracy mill:
Hawaiian governor seals Obama’s birth certificate.
Hawaii shows up in an appropriations bill for a half billion dollar botanical garden project. (Because we all know how notoriously hard it is to grow things in Hawaii!)

No quid pro quo there!

That is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard. You could of just used any appropriations Hawaii got and claimed it was quid pro quo. Was Hawaii supposed to avoid federal funding for anything?

Which part of that screams “serious research” to your tiny little mind?

I don’t know, I just think that when you make serious charges of corruption, you should know what the fuck you are talking about.

But than again you never do.

All you care about are puns and grammatical errors. Actually understanding what you are talking about doesn’t interest you. You aren’t stupid, just disengaged to a point that you might as well be. Understanding the charges you are leveling is just honorable.

Frankly, I look forward to seeing this particular conspiracy theory put to bed.

This question will not, and should not, go away until Barry releases his birth certificate just like every other nominee should do. The qualifications for being POTUS are not difficult to reach and very easy to prove. Barry still refused to do so.

Barry could put this to bed TODAY, if he were willing, but there is something on his birth certificate that he does not want the world to see. Werther it’s that he’s not a US natural-born citizen or whether it’s that his parents weren’t who he says they are or whatever, there is SOMETHING on that certificate that he does not want us to see… and frankly I find that juicy and interesting.

You want quid pro quo?

Watch and see who Obama appoints to run the World Bank. Every new American President appoints the new head of the World Bank.

Here is where it gets interesting. George Soros makes his billions in many ways, primarily from currency speculating. Now Soros spent millions of dollars and pulled many strings to help Obama get elected. Wouldn’t you expect a pay back to include the appointment of someone to run the World Bank to be someone Soros has ties with? How better to profit from the movement of currency than to have Inside Information on what country will do what/ when.

I don’t know,(Lioncourt’s autobiography in three words!) I just think that when you make serious charges of corruption, you should know what the fuck you are talking about.
But than again you never do.

Like when I have to correct your terminally pathethic spelling and grammar? Wrong again, Le Twit!
What part of the whole “conspiracy theory” are you unclear about? I made no serious charges at all! I said that the half billion dollar appropriation for Hawaii could be looked at by conspiracy theorists as a quid pro quo. I did not say I believed it. I presented no serious linkage to present that. (Did the little voices in your head tell you otherwise?) I said it was “grist for the conspiracy mill”. (Any of those words look at all familiar to you?)

Conspiracy theorists, like 9/11 truthers, do not require evidence, mere coincidence will do. Whether it truly was a quid pro quo or mere circumstance, the sheer size of the expenditure in times of economic hardship might raise eyebrows in some, but could more than pass minimum standard for a good conspiracy factoid.

It might be a good time to bring back “Closed captioning for the humor impaired”. Maybe someone could read it to you?

You could of (sic) just used any appropriations

BTW, it’s could have, Le Twit!

Of course you have done research about this appropriation.

Can you give me one specific about it? Who sponsored it?

Typical smear, you just run in innuendo because you have nothing else.

3rd. world?Isn’t that when you have the rich and the poor with no middle class?