Support For Iraq War Highest At Any Time Since 2006

Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, along with most of his political party, said we lost the Iraq nearly a year ago. Since then peace has broken out in Iraq. Troop casualties are down. Iraqi casualties are down. Al Qaeda is on the run, and Iraq’s various political factions are finding common ground.
And, perhaps most importantly, more and more Americans are starting to think that we can win this thing.

American public support for the military effort in Iraq has reached a high point unseen since the summer of 2006, a development that promises to reshape the political landscape.
According to late February polling conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 53 percent of Americans — a slim majority — now believe “the U.S. will ultimately succeed in achieving its goals” in Iraq. That figure is up from 42 percent in September 2007.
The percentage of those who believe the war in Iraq is going “very well” or “fairly well” is also up, from 30 percent in February 2007 to 48 percent today.
The situation in Iraq remains fluid, of course. A surge in violence or in troop deaths could lead to rapid fluctuations in public opinion. But as the war nears its fifth year, the steady upturn in the public mood stands to alter the dynamics of races up and down the ballot.

Unfortunately for the Democrats, they have so thoroughly invested themselves in the idea of defeat in Iraq (their Presidential front-runner, Barack Obama, is campaigning on the idea of Iraq as a failure and a policy that would require the precipitous withdrawal of troops from that country) that they literally cannot change course on the issue even as American attitudes do just that. If the tried a flip-flop on Iraq it’d come off as phony and calculated. The sort of thing politicians more concerned with winning elections than sound war-time policy would do.
Of course, the fact that the Democrats are politicians more concerned with winning elections than sound policy is the reason why they invested themselves in defeat in the first place.
But every day now it’s looking more and more like history will vindicate President Bush’s decision to invade Iraq and that Democrats – though they’ll never admit it – may just have to swallow that bitter, jagged pill.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    Losing is NOT an option!

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    If they tried a flip-flop on Iraq it'd come off as phony and calculated.

    It no longer surprises me how much Democrats will forgive their "leaders," and it shouldn't surprise you.

  • fuckyou

    1 trillion dollars later…..stop being a delusional douche….we have lost so fucking much. Anyone who thinks that we have improved anything over there is a fucking moron. Fuck you all stupid neo-con fucks.

  • richNJ

    Well F…Y.. Spoken like a true child. If you have an arguement state it! Cheap language only makes you look foolish.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Rob,

    It's good to see that you finally caught up with my post of 28 February on this…. Oh and see this preview of General Patreus' next report as well.

    Ah and I see we have another mouth breathing troll infestation, this one calling itself "fuckyou." Not much to say about that other than wondering if it uses those hands and that mouth to eat, and if its mommy knows what it's up to on the family computer…

  • Hannitized

    If the tried a flip-flop on Iraq it'd come off as phony and calculated.

    Unless of course they change their mind in "sixty days"….right?

    Give me a break with this Rob. Cheyney said the the insurgency was in its last throes before things got reatlly, really bad.

    Be honest.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Hannitzed offers:

    Give me a break with this Rob. Cheyney said the the insurgency was in its last throes before things got reatlly, really bad.

    In historical terms (for insurgency/counter-insurgency) it never got "reatlly, really bad." Since one would have to have more than a trivial understanding of such things to realize the truth of that, it's far from surprising that you don't.

    Be honest.

    There goes the pot calling the kettle blackie…

  • Hannitized

    In historical terms (for insurgency/counter-insurgency) it never got "reatlly, really bad." Since one would have to have more than a trivial understanding of such things to realize the truth of that

    You can always count on a good history revisionist to show up to tap that last nail in the coffin.

    Nice job Rodney.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Hannitzed,

    We rely on you for shallow and meaningless analysis of military affairs and history, and have so far never been disappointed (though often <acronym title="like calling Drudge a Limey">amused</acronym>).

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development