Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Suicide Rates Among Soldiers Highest In Nearly Three Decades

Meet the left-wing talking point of the year:

Army soldiers committed suicide last year at the highest rate in 26 years, and more than a quarter did so while serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a new military report. The report, obtained by The Associated Press ahead of its scheduled release Thursday, found there were 99 confirmed suicides among active duty soldiers during 2006, up from 88 the previous year and the highest number since the 102 suicides in 1991 at the time of the Persian Gulf War.

The suicide rate for the Army has fluctuated over the past 26 years, from last year’s high of 17.3 per 100,000 to a low of 9.1 per 100,000 in 2001. . . .

Failed personal relationships, legal and financial problems and the stress of their jobs were factors motivating the soldiers to commit suicide, according to the report.

“In addition, there was a significant relationship between suicide attempts and number of days deployed” in Iraq, Afghanistan or nearby countries where troops are participating in the war effort, it said. The same pattern seemed to hold true for those who not only attempted, but succeeded in killing themselves.

The important thing to remember here, however, is this statistician’s maxim: Correlation does not always suggest causation.  Just because suicide rates among soldiers are high now during a time of war is no reason to suggest that the war itself is causing it.  As Dr. James Joyner points out, the highest suicide rate ever among soldiers took place with the peace-time Army of 1980 under Jimmy Carter:

When I heard this story on NPR this morning as I was awakening, my initial reaction was that it’s not surprising that it’s been 26 years since the numbers were this high, since that was the last time the Army was engaged in a sustained war. But, of course, my groggy math was off by a decade: 26 years ago from 2006 is 1980, the last year of the Carter administration and a full seven years since our departure from Vietnam. Which means that, despite legitimate concern about suicides rising during this war (see here and here for stories from 2003), the rate was actually lower than it was during the peacetime Army of 1980.

During the intervening period, the high has been 17.3 per 100,000 and the low 9.1 per 100,000. It’s not only conceivable but probable that the fluctuation is essentially random, having more to do with the vagaries of the personal lives of the soldiers than what the Army is doing.

Rather than simply working off of just yearly suicide rates, it’d be better to match those dates up with dates of US conflict.  If, over the course of time, suicide rates spiked during conflicts and died off during peace time I think we could say that the correlation probably suggests causation (pending other evidence).  But given that military suicide rates seem to spike at intervals that have nothing to do with the wars or engagements our military is involved in I just don’t think this data indicates much of anything.

That won’t stop this data from being used as anti-war propaganda, of course, but whatever.

Comments

Avatar for FlyOnTheWall

I’d be more curious to know how these numbers compare to the population at large for similar age and demographics. 

I do find it kind of damning that the suicide rates haven’t been this high since the Carter years.  At first blush, that can’t be good.

FlyOnTheWall on August 16, 2007 at 08:03 am
Rob
Rob
18069 comments
Send a private message

I’d be more curious to know how these numbers compare to the population at large for similar age and demographics.

This, again from Dr. Joyner’s piece, is illuminating:

Marc Danziger, whose son has recently enlisted in the military, has done some calculations and found that the Army suicide rate, even at this peak, is actually lower than for their civilian cohorts. That’s interesting indeed and speaks to the Army’s vetting process and support system.

I do find it kind of damning that the suicide rates haven’t been this high since the Carter years.  At first blush, that can’t be good.

I’d say it isn’t good if we could actually tie the suicide rates to any specific military policy, up to and including deployments to war zones.  But it appears as though the peaks and valleys are completely random, owing more to the personal lives of the soldiers than anything the military is doing.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 16, 2007 at 08:10 am

One causative factor comes immediately to my mind: The overwhelmingly negative, antimilitary propaganda continually spewed by the MSM, the Dems, and by lefties in general.  The phony accusations against the military by Kerry, Obama, Harry Reid, Pelosi and Murtha can’t be good for morale, especially among the young and impressionable, which is what soldiers are.  It makes the importance of our support even more significant.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on August 16, 2007 at 08:18 am
Avatar for Robert Perry

This link indicates that overall suicides in the U.S. are about 10/100,000, but it’s also worth noting that the rates for young men are much higher.

http://www.gunowners.org/fs0404.htm

Here’s one that shows that men have a suicide rate of about 15-20 per 100,000 in the ages of most soldiers.  Again, soldiers have a lower suicide rate than men at large.

http://www.prb.org/Articles/2006/ElderlyWhiteMenAfflictedbyHighSuicideRates.aspx

Moreover, consider that we’re talking only about a few hundred thousand people.  So if the rate is 17.3/100,000, we have a case where about five or ten suicides is the difference between an ordinary year and a horrific year.  Statistically speaking, you cannot differentiate these rates.

Robert Perry on August 16, 2007 at 08:25 am

Statistically speaking, you cannot differentiate these rates.

True that.


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on August 16, 2007 at 08:40 am

As Dr. James Joyner points out, the highest suicide rate ever among soldiers took place with the peace-time Army of 1980 under Jimmy Carter:

What’s up with that?  It doesn’t exactly agree that the war is any sort of causative factor, does it?


Media uncovers more Palin stories in one weekend than Obama stories in two years. Still no bias detected

Obama: more experienced than Bristol Palin

robert108 on August 16, 2007 at 08:41 am

That the highest suicide rates were under Carter supports robert’s statement that the suicide rates may have some correlation to morale since that (morale) couldn’t have been very high under the inept Carter administration.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on August 16, 2007 at 09:18 am

The regular Say Anythingite Conservatives here seem pretty anxious to dismiss these suicide rates for some strange, unstated reason. It seems to this ignorant old fool to be a knee jerk reaction to defend something and only God knows what they are defending here. While I am a low grade moron, a self-righteous hate monger suffering from rampant paranoia, in my diseased mind it seems to me that if the suicide rates are up in the military something must be causing it and if the cause could be determined, perhaps something could be done to help them.

But the Say Anythingites here absolutely do have vastly superior wisdom, knowledge and intellect than most of us unwashed, illiterate conservative fools; and so I am sure they are all perfectly correct that this is much ado about absolutely nothing and certainly not worth investing any time seriously examining.

Too bad though, seems to me that fighting in combat is stressful enough, if something else was adding to the stress then why not find a way to lighten the emotional load. Notice that to avoid the ire of the Say Anythingites, I carefully avoided any intimation that perhaps our hostilty to religion might play a role.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on August 16, 2007 at 09:51 am
Avatar for Robert Perry

Neiman, well said, but the reality here is that all we have is a fairly loose hypothesis and a statistically insignificant uptick in the number of soldiers who take their own lives. 

Now if 75% of soldiers said “I can’t take this camp coffee anymore” or something in suicide notes, then we’d have a way at getting at a significant cause, and something we could fix.  Perhaps such information exists somewhere, but it’s not given here.

As such, it’s premature to worry.  Be concerned about suicide?  Absolutely.  Take care of soldiers to prevent it?  You bet. 

Change the mission based on no clear evidence?  Now there’s a way to get a LOT of soldiers killed, not to mention Iraqis.

Robert Perry on August 16, 2007 at 10:09 am

Robert Perry: I am not too bright and I don’t want to offend anyone here as they can be a pretty vicious lot, in my foggy brain it still appears to me that everyone posting until my post were trying very hard to totally dismiss these statistics for some unknown reasons.

I could have missed where anyone was using these statistics to justify ending the war, but I am fairly illiterate, so I could have missed it, if so I would be absolutely against that reaction for the reasons you stated much better than I ever could. My only poorly made point was that if the suicide rates have gone up, let us say because of poor moral, then back when I was in the military in ancient times, morale was an important factor in winning a war; and if we identify that as a major factor and that the constant calls to cut and run are even partially behind these increased suicide rates, then the American people need to know about it and tell their elected officials to knock it off.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on August 16, 2007 at 10:21 am
Avatar for FlyOnTheWall

I hadn’t considered that we’ve only got about 200,000 soldiers to draw conclusions from, especially given the 17.3 of 100,000.  I’d want to know what the normal year to year variation is but an uptick of 5 - 10 death begins to approach statistical signifigance for me.  (Man, that sounds callous, dickering over how many sigma I’d worry about.)

I try to keep my end times/Revelation theology in check usually but it’s got to be spritually harsh over there.

FlyOnTheWall on August 16, 2007 at 12:25 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.