Stupid: Sarah Palin Joins Other Republican Governors In Begging Congress For “Stimulus” Spending

I’ve got to say that I’ve just lost a whole lot of faith in Sarah Palin.

NEW YORK (AP) — Most Republican governors have broken with their GOP colleagues in Congress and are pushing for passage of President Barack Obama’s economic aid plan that would send billions to states for education, public works and health care.
Their state treasuries drained by the financial crisis, governors would welcome the money from Capitol Hill, where GOP lawmakers are more skeptical of Obama’s spending priorities.
The 2008 GOP vice presidential nominee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, scheduled meetings in Washington this weekend with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and other senators to press for her state’s share of the package.
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist worked the phones last week with members of his state’s congressional delegation, including House Republicans. Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas, the Republican vice chairman of the National Governors Association, planned to be in Washington on Monday to urge the Senate to approve the plan. . . .
Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, who is widely viewed as a potential presidential contender in 2012, said governors have little choice but to accept the relief being offered. “States have to balance their budgets,” he said. “So if we’re going to go down this path, we are entitled to ask for our share of the money.”

“Entitled.” They’re entitled to even more of our tax dollars.
Because goodness knows they can’t balance the budget by, oh I don’t know, cutting back on spending.
Not even Bobby Jindal is taking a principled stand, though he at least seems a bit reluctant about the whole thing:

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a former member of the House, said he would accept the stimulus money but would have voted against the bill if he were still in Congress.

Well that’s reassuring, Bobby.
I think, before any Governor gets any “stimulus” spending (or, more accurately, “bailout” money for irresponsible local spending), he or she should have to prove that their state budgets are absolutely free of any spending on things not strictly necessary to the operation of the government. If they can’t do that, then they’ve no need of a stimulus bailout.
I’ve heard people say that the future of the GOP may lay with the governors, but given the way they’re scrambling over one another to belly up to the federal trough for a bailout of their respective states’ overzealous spending I’d say that future doesn’t look too bright.
On a related note, wouldn’t this be a great time for Governors of states like, oh I don’t know, North Dakota to come out and say “Hey, we don’t need the bailout. Our budgets balance, thank you very much.”
Not that North Dakota’s budget has as much to do with sound political leadership as a favorable mix of favorable energy and ag markets, but whatever.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Hannitized

    You should let the economy tank and our country fall to ruins, like a purist political Conservative. – Rob Port

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    She’s just like all republicans. They whine about government until they’re in need then they’re the first ones with their hands out.

    Happens with the republican citizens too.

  • robert108

    Again, in politics and plumbing, shit rolls downhill.

  • Jay

    Rob,

    You make is sound like asking, receiving and spending federal dollars is new to her as a governor. It’s obviously not. She did her fair share of panhandling as Governor in the past. She’s a neocon, obnoxious spending is her forte.

  • Hannitized

    I don’t know how people who claim to support her, can dump all over her without getting their facts straight.

    Rob is most definitely not known for getting his facts straight. That is the majority of the problem, with most of his posts.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    Rob, who is a great American, is a political purist.

    purists are admirable folk who never hold actual political power…see Ralph Nader

    Sarah Palin is a born politician in the best sense…she will use power FOR her CONSERVATIVE state and if we are lucky, she will use power FOR US

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Rob is most definitely not known for getting his facts straight. That is the majority of the problem, with most of his posts.

    RPDS

  • SHADY

    So has any sissy libs refused their entitlement of child tax credits?? Same as getting fed-funding for each state!!

  • http://kentucky.allamericanblogger.com/ Brandon

    They, including Sarah Palin, want the money for one simple reason:

    If the crap sandwich passes, their constituents will be paying the taxes for it anyway. It would be stupid for residents of states with GOP governors who reject the money to pay the taxes for it with nothing to show in their home state.

    Sarah is probably only wanting it for the transportation money anyway.

  • gustave776

    Dino, you are the colon.

    Sara is my hero, but she is human. She is doing what will better her state.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    Why’d you put a colon in there?

    Gene will be crushed that she’s one of them!

  • ellinas

    A Citizen. It seems you can’t stay away from me.
    You are taking potshots like a spurned spinster.
    Trying to get my attention? Well no attention is coming your way, until you decide to be honest and forthcoming.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    I take a different view, I guess.

    Should/When this “Commie $hit-Sammich” gets made into law [rammed down our throats], Palin MUST ensure that her state receives their portion of the “Pork-Ulous” monies. It’s a fucking shame, bit true all the same…….

    Having said that, I would be more likely to entrust the money under her control, than say the governor of Michigan or Massachusetts.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Once Govt money is OKed doesn’t it have to be spent? Aren’t they required to spend it? They can’t just keep it and use it wisely? Am I correct?

  • robert108

    Conservatives should want states run in a fashion that makes them more independent of the federal government.

    That’s what we are working toward, but it’s not a present reality. The fact is, a vengeful Obama could put Alaska’s oil industry out of business with some executive orders. The erosion of State sovereignty has been going on for a very long time, and this is one of the outcomes of that erosion.
    The Dem totalitarians need to be reminded of the fact that the US is a representative Republic, not their own private fiefdom.

  • robert108

    This is certainly discouraging, Rob, but you might be making more of it than is actually there. Governors are primarily responsible to the citizens of their respective States, and must put their needs first. Since the Federal Govt isn’t fiscally responsible, it is much harder to preach fiscal responbilbility to the States, whose residents have to actually pay the bill for the pork spending package. It is a nice fantasy to think that some State should buck the trend, and stand for fiscal responsibility, while the Federal govt crushes its citizens with taxes and “green” regulations, but it’s unrealistic.
    Remember the old principle of politics(and plumbing):

    Shit rolls downhill.

    Maobama is rolling all over all of us right now.

  • brenarlo

    Well, clearly she’s becoming “mainstreamed” which isn’t good.

  • patriot

    The only Governor I’ve seen so far that does NOT have his hand out is Mark Sanford of South Carolina. So far very, very solid.

    Tim Pawlenty is being very disingenuous with his hand out, denying it on one hand with some nonsensical language while putting is hand further out.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    ST. PAUL, Minn., Sept. 1 — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    …In fiscal year 2002, Wasilla took in $6.1 million in earmarks — about $1,000 in federal money for every resident. By contrast, Boise, Idaho — which has more than 190,000 residents — received $6.9 million in earmarks in fiscal 2008.

    All told, Wasilla benefited from $26.9 million in earmarks in Palin’s final four years in office.

    “She certainly wasn’t shy about putting the old-boy network to use to bring home millions of dollars,” said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense. “She’s a little more savvy to the ways of Washington than she’s let on.”

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Arizona, the second fastest growing state in the nation, will receive just $18.70 per capita in federal earmarks this fiscal year. By comparison, Alaska — with roughly a tenth of Arizona’s population — is set to receive $506.34 per capita, the highest in the nation, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group which tracks earmarks.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    The state of Alaska receives about three times as much as Arizona receives in actual dollars, $346 million to $119 million

  • welder4

    I would rather Alaska get a share of the money as to see Acorn get anything, the money if not going to the states will go to one or more of Obamas pet people or organizations so she is just making sure she has some say over how some of the money is spent, other wise the money leaves her state and never returns but goes to fund “how to vote seven times . She is just using her head to see to it that some of the money is spent wisely , not a hard concept at all. Go Plain Go!

  • AR-15

    (To RBB)
    My oh MY, how sad your going to be in four years when we have POTUS Palin. What a historic moment it will be for America.

  • Onslaught

    Why’d you put a colon in there?

    Can’t you type even one sentence without talking about your ass?

  • tjexcite

    It is hard to be Conservative when your books are red and there is a big pile of money that is going somewhere. Why not have it going toward your red over someones else’s red. It is still going somewhere other than back to the taxpayers in tax cuts.

  • http://northerngleaner.blogspot.com/ Gene

    I’m hard to crush. She’s my hero.

    I asked 4 different conservatives today who in their opinion would or could offer a challenge to BHO in 2012. I didn’t tip my hand.

    They were: Son in Fargo, Cousin in Watertown (yes we are those Redlins), Brother in MN and Friend in Riverside IL.

    After a little thought and without any prompting from me they all answered the same way. Sarah Palin.

    Rob, there is no one else. No one. Unless someone emerges, she has to run against the one. The Republican party is pitiful and other than Sarah, leaderless.

  • A Citizen

    Arizona, the second fastest growing state in the nation

    It also has about 500,000 illegals who are sucking the state dry.

  • robert108

    I dislike Sarah Palin as much as the next guy…

    Actually, real men like Sarah; the only ones that don’t are the leftie girlie men who let women tell them what to do and think.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    I read these posts in order and noticed something interesting. When backed into a a corner, as happens a lot when one of the liberals posts something that directly challenges one of the cons, the con will simply deflect, change the subject or otherwise cloud the issue.

    When it was shown how Alaska gets tons more in federal dollars than they put in in comparison to Arizona, the topic shifted to illegals in Arizona. Totally unrelated. Totally unsupporting of an opposing opinion.

  • greg

    Too many people are jumping to conclusions, based on what, a story spread by the AP (Anti-Palin). Obviously, you never read the letter she sent the Alaska congressional delegation outlining 4 projects related to gas pipelines, and told them that she is OPPOSED to requested for pet projects other than these 4 infrastructure projects. By the way, these projects would have been requested, stimulus package or no stimulus package. You should also watch her state of the state address just delivered last week. She is definately opposed to this pork laden bill with money for ACORN, etc.

    I don’t know how people who claim to support her, can dump all over her without getting their facts straight.

    Settle down, and get real.

  • Lioncourt

    I dislike Sarah Palin as much as the next guy, but this attack is unfair.

    As a governor of a state it is her obligation to help the state. If there is money available to the states it is her job to make a case that she can use it for her state.

    It doesn’t do her state any good for her to stand on principle when nobody else does.

  • ellinas

    My! My! Lok at you gals falling all over to defend your Messiah!

  • Hannitized

    So then Obama is enabling her to better her state?

  • DixieKaren

    After a little thought and without any prompting from me they all answered the same way. Sarah Palin.

    Rob, there is no one else

    She’s all there is? Sad state of affairs indeed. Do you really believe she is suited to be the world’s most powerful figure? Better than anything else in the GOP lineup?

  • jk

    whatever is necessary to get elected and enrich herself.

    Sounds like our president

  • bill-tb

    Bailout for state overspending … They spent like drunken sailors when home prices and PROPERTY TAXES were shooting for the moon. Now they are having to lay off precious state workers BOO fricking HOO.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    SO I guess she is a RINO too?

  • Hannitized

    So Proof, is it your position that Rob got it right in this post, yes or no?

  • crshedd

    Once Govt money is OKed doesn’t it have to be spent? Aren’t they required to spend it? They can’t just keep it and use it wisely? Am I correct?

    zsa zsa,

    we know that once money is ‘oked’ by the government that it does not have to be spent.

    didn’t sarah palin ‘just say no’ to the bridge to nowhere? thank god she saved us all millions! oh, wait, no she didn’t. she took the money and spent it on other stuff.

  • http://boyddrivefollies.blogspot.com/ Good Ol Boy

    Question: How does Alaska presently stack up in terms of dollars sent to Washington, vs. dollars back?

  • checkers

    If she refuses stimulus spending then the money that the Federal government takes out of the pockets of Alaskan citizens will go to other states, but not theirs. And it has not a thing to do with what Sarah Palin believes or stands for. She can not stop that money from leaving her state. All she can control is how much she gets back. And as the elected Governor it is her job to do that. If she does not do it she will be booted out by her constituents next election.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Rob is most definitely not known for getting his facts straight. That is the majority of the problem, with most of his posts.

    Which, undoubtedly accounts for the fact that 2009 will only see the seven millionth visitor to Rob’s blog, whereas you, on the other hand, with the Hannitized Surf Shop and Kiddie Pool Review…have how many visitors?

    And what was that URL again? I seem to have misplaced it!

  • Andrew

    I do not this article if fair. The Federal government pushes numerous UNFUNDED MANDATES. Unless the Feds want to remove the mandates, governors are going to come asking for funds.

  • ellinas

    SO I guess she is a RINO too?

    goon on February 1, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    You got it! And you gals took the bait, hook, line and sinker too.
    Like all politicians she is self serving and will do and say
    whatever is necessary to get elected and enrich herself.

  • sayanything-2483

    So then Obama is enabling her to better her state?

    Actually it’s the taxpayers.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I think we have to see how the governors who take the $$ spend it before passing judgement.

    I don’t, frankly.

    Conservatives should want states run in a fashion that makes them more independent of the federal government. Not more dependent. We should want leaders who, when faced with budget short falls, look for ways to limit government instead of feeding its growth with more spending even if that spending does come from another level of government.

    I’m sorry, but there’s no excuse for this sort of behavior from Republicans.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Why’d you put a colon in there?

    Because Sarah isn’t stupid. What she’s doing is stupid.

    Kind of like Obama (though Palin doesn’t deserve to be compared to him). He’s not stupid. He just does stupid things.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    “So if we’re going to go down this path, we are entitled to ask for our share of the money.”

    As in, if the spending is going to be done, then at least the money should not be spent without an eye to the states’ needs as opposed to whatever the morons in congress want to blow it on. That’s the way I interpret that sentence.

    That the spending is going to be done is not in question. The word “mandate” hasn’t come up likely due to the bending over the Dems got from the voters the last time they tried the in-your-face arrogance of claiming that, but it’s the same attitude. They are determined to spend it come hell or high water and the Dems are with very few exceptions very full of themselves right now.

    I’d rather see Republicans scrambling for the dollars at the state level and do everything they can to divert every bit they can to actual public works and infrastructure projects rather than condoms and how to f*ck manuals for kids.

  • sayanything-2483

    I don’t, frankly.

    Good point, I stand humbly enlightened.

  • sayanything-2483

    My! My! Lok at you gals falling all over to defend your Messiah!

    As usual, you’re off point.

  • sayanything-2483

    didn’t sarah palin ‘just say no’ to the bridge to nowhere? thank god she saved us all millions! oh, wait, no she didn’t. she took the money and spent it on other stuff.
    crshedd on February 1, 2009 at 04:40 pm

    Obama and Biden Voted for Bridge to Nowhere
    John Powers 31 August 2008 123 Comments

    Now that Alaska is front and center in the news again, it is a good time to catch up on a favorite story, The Bridge to Nowhere, using the Washington Post US Congress Votes Database.

    Though Gov. Palin originally supported the earmark spending on the Ketchikan bridge (“to nowhere), she eventually killed the project, choosing to spend Federal money on other infrastructure programs.

    However, Sen. Biden and Sen. Obama voted for funding the Bridge, even when given a second chance by Sen. Tom Coburn, who proposed shifting earmark funds to Katrina relief.

    Sen. McCain did not vote on the Coburn Amendment, though he is on record as opposing the Ketchikan bridge earmark.

    Link to votes record below.
    Read the Full Story: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/senate/1/votes/262/

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    As a governor of a state it is her obligation to help the state.

    Like a typical liberal, you assume that more government spending is in the best interests of the state. And, of course, you’re wrong.

    And this is no attack on Sarah Palin. There are many things to admire about her. But in this she’s wrong, so I’m criticizing her for it.

    See, we conservatives hold people on our side accountable when they do wrong. You liberals should try it once in a while.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Hey, I hate ragging on Sarah as much as you guys don’t like reading it, but the truth is the truth. She’s lining up for porked up “stimulus” spending when she could be making a principled stand.

    To suggest that the governors have to take this stimulus spending is to suggest that there is no other solution to the out of control stimulus spending.

    I don’t think that’s accurate.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    It is hard to be Conservative when your books are red and there is a big pile of money that is going somewhere. Why not have it going toward your red over someones else’s red.

    Because it’s all our money. We all feel the burden of it, whether it goes to Alaska or Hawaii or wherever.

    If the books are in the red, why not cut spending instead of increasing it?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Once Govt money is OKed doesn’t it have to be spent? Aren’t they required to spend it? They can’t just keep it and use it wisely? Am I correct?

    I’m not sure if there is a loophole that allows states to re-purpose federal dollars or not. Probably not, given the state of federalism in this country.

    But even so, Palin is in DC asking for the money. This isn’t a situation where it’s being forced on her.

  • sayanything-2483

    Arizona, the second fastest growing state in the nation

    It’s growing because of the number of illegals coming across the border that Napolitano left open. She also left Arizona with $1.6 BILLION deficit. And now she’s the one in charge of protecting us. Buckle up!!!

  • sayanything-2483

    Trying to get my attention? Well no attention is coming your way, until you decide to be honest and forthcoming.

    Again you contradict yourself and prove yourself a fool.

  • sayanything-2483

    Hey, I hate ragging on Sarah as much as you guys don’t like reading it, but the truth is the truth. She’s lining up for porked up “stimulus” spending when she could be making a principled stand.

    I think we have to see how the governors who take the $$ spend it before passing judgement.

  • sayanything-2483

    She’s just like all republicans. They whine about government until they’re in need then they’re the first ones with their hands out.

    Ray Nagin’s comes to mind….

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development