Stupid: Maryland City Attacks Private Schools By Banning Children From City Parks

The idea behind public parks is that they provide a safe place for kids to come and play. In one Maryland city, they think too many kids are playing in their parks. So children over five have been banned from the parks during daytime hours.
The motivation? A local private school’s children were playing in one of the private parks during recess.

KENSINGTON, Md. – Public parks are usually the places where children go to have fun. But the town of Kensington just passed a new rule that bans kids over five years old from playgrounds during the daytime. …
The town council unanimously passed a resolution this week saying only caretakers with children five years old and younger can be in Reinhardt Park from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Since that resolution passed, Brookewood students have gone elsewhere for recess. “We like to use the park because it’s big and we like to run around and play games,” said Basia Syski, a fifth-grade student.
The town manager says students using the park for recess created maintenance issues and damage. The town council asked the school to pay $4,000 a year to help with upkeep but never heard back.
“Do a clean through trash pickup, lay mulch around the swings — we could do that,” said McPherson. “But pay $4,000? We just don’t have it. We just don’t have it in our budget.”

So now a public part is going to sit empty during the day because the city’s politicians couldn’t shake down the private school for some extra money.
Here’s the ugliest part of the whole story: The suggestion by the town’s mayor that the private school kids were “abusing” the park.

Brookewood’s headmaster tells ABC 7 News it’s a public park for all too use but Kensington’s mayor disagrees. By phone he said the park is for taxpaying citizens — not abuse by a private non-profit school.

So if it was a public school it’d be ok. But a private school?
I guess those kids’ parents don’t pay taxes.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Bill

    I live on the street where the park is, what the headmaster of the school doesnt tell you is that the town council called and sent letters to him to sit down and dicuss the matter, the headmaster refused, instead he called the news stations and said the town is mean and wont let our kids use the park for free. It is not even a county park it is a town park, the residents of the town pay for it. The council has no problem with the kids using it but they need to pitch in financially like everyone else. The headmaster won’t even sitdown to have a conversation, if he thinks smearing the towns public image will help his cause he is wrong. Yes the town said 4k, but sitdown with them and make your case, maybe its 1k and the schools own handyman helps out with repairs, who knows, but you can’t resolve anything if you are unwilling to talk about it.

  • sayanything-287

    While I understand your point, isn’t a weakness to your argument that these people were willing to do clean-up, lay mulch around the swings and etcetera? So it wasn’t like they were not willing to cooperate and work with the city, it was their denying all children access and wanting to charge the private school $4,000./year that was out of line.

  • sayanything-287

    Chances are the parents still pay taxes for public schools and other city or school district owned and operated facilities don’t they? I know that in most states everyone, even private school student parents, pay taxes for these things, even if they don’t use them.

  • sayanything-43

    Believe it or not that crap happens in North Dakota. The city (or park board) of Grand Forks took down the basketball hoops in University park because “kids were using it.”

    Horrors.

  • sayanything-4204

    …and we’d think that conservatives would not be denied certain facets of health care by levels upon levels of beuracrats loyal only to some ‘ism.

  • sayanything-2407

    Interesting. A public park that isn’t for all of the public, just …some.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    You just don’t get. A park means lots of high paying jobs for slackers. An
    empty park means even less work.

    You just have to understand WHAT the park is for.

  • sayanything-4124

    I homeschool. My daughter spent 4 years in public school, but my 9th grade son has never attended a public school(a year and a half in a private Lutheran school).

    I pay taxes for public schools and don’t use any of the facilities, equipment or books. I pay out of pocket for my kids curric each year.

    I actually save the school district money each year, as the money is with the school, but the extra body isn’t ;)

    That being said, I have never said anything about paying for ps. This would have me speaking out I think.

    “taxpaying” citizens are indeed parents of private and homeschooled children, and have every right to use that park. I bet day-care and after school programs wouldn’t have an issue using that park.

    I think their offer of mulching, etc was quite reasonable.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Since when are public parks based on usage anyway. Is this town going to
    refund money to people that never go to the park?

  • Fannie Canfield

    Incorrect. The park is paid for by Town tax only and only Town Residents pay this special tax. The school is non-profit and none of the parents live in the Town limits.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    So why select one small group to chip in and pay. Why not users of the park
    in the evenings as well?

    No there’s just an attitude here that the public park belongs to the park
    district, not the public.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Well they should, rather than pick on this small group that was using it
    during the day time.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    instead he called the news stations and said the town is mean and wont let our kids use the park for free.

    It’s a public park. The school, the school’s employees and the parents of the school’s students all pay taxes no doubt. So why shouldn’t they get to use it for “free”? They’re paying for it, as well as the city school system which they’ve opted out of.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Maybe they should start charging admission to the parks.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    So the park isn’t for kids to play in. The park is for the government
    to give bureacrats jobs managing and administering them.

    Gotcha.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Federalism is a wonderful thing.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    And then they complain that our kids are too fat.

  • sayanything-7743

    Nieman, you are right, Maryland parents who send their children to private schools, still pay property taxes to fund government run schools. When you think about it, it is a good deal for the local government run school, they get money and don’t have to perform a service in exchange. Believe me, based upon experience, I know this is true – I have writtten many a titution check.

    It would be interesting to know if this use restriction applies in the summer when schools, including governemnt run schools, are out closed for summer vaction. What happens if some 8 year olds want tp play in the park some summer afternoon? Will they be arrested? Maybe parenst who send their children to private chools should refuse to pay taxes to support the park.

    Spartacus: you are right, Maryland elects the worst politicians around. Martin O’Malley was one reason I fleed too. Maryland is a nice state, a great place to live, but…..

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    That’s a really good point, Neiman. Private school/home school parents continue to pay taxes for public schools. And they pay taxes for the public parks. And yet they’re denied use of them?

  • sayanything-81

    I don’t think SOME of the logic is hard to follow.

    If a private business is using the park for business purposes and inflicting unusual wear on it, and all of this can be proven, I think it’s within the city’s right to ask for compensation.

    Banning all children, however, is f**king stupid.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    The parks that is, specifically. Not that these parents are being denied access to the public schools.

  • bikebubba

    Exactly how does a bit of wear and tear on a park amount to four grand? I’m sorry, but having spent two summers working for public parks (three parks with three playgrounds), I’m hard pressed to believe that wear and tear on one park was that much. Properly built playground equipment simply doesn’t get beat up that way.

  • spartacus

    haven’t all of the childrens parents already paid for maintenance of the park through normal taxes? Shouldn’t wear & tear be based on annual usage since the budget is annual.

    Spin it any way you want Sparkie, you’re wanting to turn tax dollar funded parks into a revenue stream, capitalist pig.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I doubt very much that the school’s enrollment is entirely out-of-town parents, but even if that were true…the school itself pays no property taxes? No city sales taxes? It contributes nothing to the revenue coffers of the city at all?

    I’m sorry, but that sounds like baloney to me.

  • sayanything-21

    This needs to be opposed. I will post it in a couple places. Pressure works.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Right. I thought the whole point here was to build parks so people would
    use them. What good does an empty park do anyone?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I think the parents being targeted for this should ask to be opted out of
    the park department taxes.

  • spartacus

    We’re talking about Maryland here. They like to elect that breed of idiot to office there. That’s just one of many reasons why I fled the stupidity years ago.

  • sayanything-7743

    Whistler, you maybe right, there could easily be some petty park people protecting their turf, but call me cynical, I guess my observation is based upon experience and years of watching these elected legislative critters. Regardless of whether they are city, county, state or federal critters in Fargo, Bismarck, Annapolis, Baltimore or Washington, they are always looking for two things: increasing their power/authority over our lives and seeking more of other people’s (our) money to spend. These critters prefer having our money given to them to spend, but as an alternative, they will settle for mandating how you spend your money. True, the amount is small, but you have to start somewhere – the old adage about the camels nose in the tent comes to mind. As to your question why target this group? Just my gut feeling but, based upon years of living in MD, this state is heavily controlled by Democrats helped kept in power by their union goons and thugs. If you are going to shake down an organization for money, what better way to help your friends than to pick on a private school which probably is not under the control of the local teacher’s Union?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Yeah, “shakedown” came to my mind too.

  • sayanything-7743

    On the other hand, maybe it isn’t about maintenance and clean-up, but the money. Like most governments, Kensington has probably been impacted by the current economic downtown and is looking for ways to increase revenues – you can not expect government officials to participate in the recession. The town just wants the money.

  • bikebubba

    I’m reminded of what my boss said about another town department (street department); that they’d have one thumb in their mouth, the other at the other end, changing occasionally for taste.

    We tried not to be government workers. Slack off on a 95 degree day, and you’d quickly be accused of being union. In a town where half the workers belonged to one. (steel town in Indiana)

  • sayanything-3352

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development