Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Saturday, May 06, 2006

Stenehjem: UND Nickname Lawsuit Should Use Private Funds

Hmm...

BISMARCK, N.D. - The University of North Dakota should raise private funds for any legal fight against the NCAA over the use of the school's Fighting Sioux nickname, Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem says.

Stenehjem said he will provide school officials an outline of the legal grounds they could use to attack the NCAA's conclusion that the nickname is hostile and abusive to American Indians. However, UND's nickname argument shouldn't be paid for by taxpayer funds or student tuition, he said.

"Any lawsuit should be funded by voluntary contributions, and we should find a way to make that happen, if there's a lawsuit at all," he said. A legal fight should cost well under $1 million, the attorney general said.


I'm a bit torn on this.

On one hand, I see the logic behind using only private funds. Public funds and tuition money are provided to the school for one single purpose: Providing higher education. Using those funds for a lawsuit against the NCAA would only detract from that goal.

On the other hand, one must remember that Fighting Sioux Hockey is a significant source of revenue for UND, not to mention something that makes the school attractive to potential students. While changing the hockey teams logo/nickname won't make UND hockey disappear the loss of a regional icon could have a significant impact on interest among fans and students, and the resulting loss of revenue would have serious repercussions for the university.

Let's not forget that UND sports brings in a lot of money to the school in general. Protecting that revenue stream would seem to be a valid expenditure of the university's allocated public funds and tuition funds.

Comments

Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Let’s not forget that UND sports brings in a lot of money to the school in general. 

It would be interesting to know what would happen if Athletics were seperate from Academics in the budget.  I’d can only assume that if Athletics were forced to be self-sustaining that they would go under rather quickly.

Rob, you’ve called for a halt to the subsidized education system.  Lets start with sports.   

FreeRepublicans.com on May 6, 2006 at 03:08 pm
Rob
Rob
19175 comments
Send a private message

Free,

I think the Sioux probably make enough to fund themselves.  But you’re right for most colleges.

But, here’s a thought: How about we stop subsidizing higher education altogether?  That’s something I could get behind. 


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on May 6, 2006 at 03:10 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Ok, but when revenues go down cause people arent educated and can’t make as much dont complain when the libs raise your taxes.

The only way expanding the base and dropping the burden works is if people can make more money.  

Also, your not allowed to take advantage of any benifits an educated society provide, ok? 

FreeRepublicans.com on May 6, 2006 at 03:14 pm

Raising a $1 million would be cake to do.  There are plenty of alumni and supporters out there to surmount a viable fight.  GO SIOUX!!!

Dave W on May 6, 2006 at 04:40 pm
Avatar for PJG

There are plenty of alumni and supporters out there to surmount a viable fight.  GO SIOUX!!!

As a graduate of one of the Fighting Sioux past rivals (North Dakota State), I would even send money to help them fight to retain their nickname and logo. During my years at NDSU, the best cheer coming from the student section at the "New Fieldhouse" and Dacatoh Field was: "THE SIOUX SUCK, SIOUX SUCK, SIOUX SUCK". Now, if only UND had the courage to play us in sports again.

PJG on May 7, 2006 at 05:08 am

FreeRepublicans.com said, Ok, but when revenues go down cause people arent educated and can’t make as much dont complain when the libs raise your taxes.

Why would you assume that tax revenues would go down? You seem to have a lot of assumptions that you base your economic "reality" around Dustin. You’re like most liberals in that regard.

likwidshoe on May 7, 2006 at 05:16 am

Now, if only UND had the courage to play us in sports again.

It’s NDSU who doesn’t want to agree on terms for football.  NDSU is D-I, they’re too good for little ol’ UND.  It’s all about the money now for SU. 

Dave W on May 7, 2006 at 05:37 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Now, if only UND had the courage to play us in sports again.

NDSU jumped because they couldn’t beat us anymore.  They figured that with double the scholarshps they’d win.  I think it’s fitting not to play the cheaters.

More seriously, athletics are a huge part of marketing a university to students and alumni.  There aren’t many schools that don’t rely on athletics.

That being said if UND requires private doners to  pay for the defense it’ll happen.  But don’t be surprised if the university get’s less money in other donations. 

 

The Whistler on May 7, 2006 at 05:43 am
Avatar for ellinas

Why would you assume that tax revenues would go down? You seem to have a lot of assumptions that you base your economic "reality" around Dustin. You’re like most liberals in that regard.

 

likwidshoe on May 7, 2006 at 8:15 AMBecause dummy, generaly speaking educated workers earn more than ones without a college degree!
ellinas on May 7, 2006 at 08:12 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Because dummy, generaly speaking educated workers earn more than ones without a college degree!

Q.  How do you get an NDSU graduate off of your porch?

A.  Pay him for the pizza. 

 

The Whistler on May 7, 2006 at 10:44 am
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Q.  How do you get an NDSU graduate off of your porch?

A.  Pay him for the pizza.

Having been a delivery driver three seperate times during college I can tell you he’s probably making more money driving than he could make at a "real job."

I’m trying to pursue a professional career, but driving is always a lucrative fall-back option. 

FreeRepublicans.com on May 7, 2006 at 11:00 am
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

yeah, too bad the oil companies are screwing you, right Free....

Tom_with_a_Dream on May 7, 2006 at 11:10 am
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

yeah, too bad the oil companies are screwing you, right Free....

Amongst others.   

FreeRepublicans.com on May 7, 2006 at 11:20 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Having been a delivery driver three seperate times during college I can tell you he’s probably making more money driving than he could make at a "real job."

Philosopher/Driver 

The Whistler on May 7, 2006 at 01:17 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Philosopher/Driver/Grease Monkey/Computer Geeks/Politico/Overly-Unemployed

FreeRepublicans.com on May 7, 2006 at 01:21 pm

Careful with the computer geeks thing.

Dave W on May 7, 2006 at 01:31 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Why? Geek isn’t a derogatory term.  Plus I can describe myself however I see fit.

This is America still, right? 

FreeRepublicans.com on May 7, 2006 at 01:41 pm

I thought he was describing NDSU grads.  Sorry...  /web confusion.

Dave W on May 7, 2006 at 01:45 pm
Avatar for EMU

Jeez, dont use tuition, I’ll get mad.

 

EMU on May 7, 2006 at 01:49 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.