State Run Media: Coming Soon To A Newspaper Near You

Recently the US Senate discussed bailouts for the nation’s newspapers, including the possible creation of a government training program for reporters. In some parts of the country local government is already propping up newspapers in the name of “economic development.” But over in Europe, as usual, they’re way ahead of America when it comes to the audacity of big government.
The Dutch government is actually paying reporters direction, and in France they’re subsidizing demand for newspapers:

The Dutch government is planning to spend 4 million euros (over $5.6 million) to pay the salaries of 60 young journalists to work on otherwise commercially funded regional and national newspapers across the country.
Dutch media minister Ronald Plasterk has outlined a plan to fund two “government journalists” to work on each of the Netherlands’ 30 daily newspapers. …
The Dutch move follows French president Nicolas Sarkozy’s promise to provide 600 million euros ($850m) in emergency aid to France’s failing newspaper industry and supply every 18-year-old with a year’s free subscription to the paper of their choice in an effort to boost reading habits.

Journalists are important no doubt, as is a free and independent press. But a press corps that is dependent upon the government for aid and subsidy is hardly free and independent. And that’s the problem. A press corps beholden to the government does the public at large little good.
Besides, who said that newspapers were so bloody important that they must be propped up at the public’s expense when the public clearly isn’t buying them? As Thomas Jefferson once said, “The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Not to mention that NPR is being funded on our dime to pay for it’s liberal slant.

  • raj58045

    state-run media can be a good thing in that its bias is obvious so the consumer just ignores it.

    I don’t think that applies in this country. Look at the Obama media treatment. Few liberals are even the least bit skeptical of the way his groupies in the media have portrayed him. They fall right in line with whatever the media tells them.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    With respect to Polemic’s comment, during the Cold War I heard a Russian to say, with not a little anger, the difference between the American media and the Soviet media is that the Americans believe theirs!

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    The Up Side:

    There is a long line of political theory (mainly from the former USSR where no Russian citizen took Russian publications seriously) that supports the idea that state-run media can be a good thing in that its bias is obvious so the consumer just ignores it.

    So if we’re taking all of the already-biased media and putting a nice clear government stamp on them, it’s almost like a disclaimer: “Don’t read this shit.”

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Just ’cause they print it don’t mean ya hafta buy it…. ;-)

    I have to ask, though, who will be the new “Media Czar”?

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    MORE Fascism.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Joseph Goebbels would be proud.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development