Speaking Out
Via As I Please:
Lileks has a great post today, here are some of my favorite parts:
Not only is this laugh-out-loud funny but its right on target too. The problem with our media is that, before 9/11, they haven't had anything very serious to cover since Vietnam. Sure major news stories came and went, but nothing like the terrorist attacks or the war in Iraq. This new generation of television producers doesn't know what's important and what isn't when something like the Michael Jackson story trumps one of the most important Presidential speeches of the last decade.
But don't take my word for it, go and read the entire post.
Lileks has a great post today, here are some of my favorite parts:
You know what? Michael Moore is right. There are many Americans who are ignorant of the world around them. And they're all TV news producers. Two big bombs in Istanbul, and what's the big story of the day? Following around a pervy slab of albino Play-Doh as he turns himself into the police. I was stunned to discover last night that Nightline not only covered the Jackson case in detail, but bumped coverage of the Whitehall speech, which was the most important speech since the Iraq campaign began and arguably the most important speech of the war, period.
...
Nightline, supposedly the Thinking Person's Late Night Show, was split about whether a repudiation of 50 years of foreign policy was slightly more important than the arrest of a washed-up, crotch-grabbing yee-hee! squeaking nutball who was probably the horrid pedophile everyone already thought he was.
...
Of course Jackson is an item of interest, but it's a below-the-fold story. It's an artifact of the noisy empty 90s, the Jerry Springer era, the time when the networks sought out the people pasted to their sofas shoveling in Doritos and watching hapless fools throw folding chairs at their ex-lovers. Watching the nets fall over themselves covering Jackson makes you suspect that they yearn for those days, because they are profoundly ambivalent about the conflict in which we are engaged.
They fear Islamic terrorism, but it's an abstract fear now. Their distaste of Bush is much more tangible and immediate; it's part of the atmosphere in the newsroom. This is his war, not theirs. If it is a war at all.
Not only is this laugh-out-loud funny but its right on target too. The problem with our media is that, before 9/11, they haven't had anything very serious to cover since Vietnam. Sure major news stories came and went, but nothing like the terrorist attacks or the war in Iraq. This new generation of television producers doesn't know what's important and what isn't when something like the Michael Jackson story trumps one of the most important Presidential speeches of the last decade.
But don't take my word for it, go and read the entire post.
