Sotomayor slipping

As already noted, the bar sinister was far from pleased with nominee Sotomayor’s furious backpedaling. Now Rasmussen reluctantly admits that while an overwhelming majority think this jurist will be confirmed, a plurality believe she should not be.

Following Two Days of Hearings, 90% Expect Sotomayor to Be Confirmed
RasmussenReports


A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 37% of voters now favor her confirmation while 43% are opposed. Importantly, those who are undecided have a positive view of President Obama and are probably willing to give him and his nominee the benefit of the doubt.

The partisan divide over the nominee is predictable. By a three-to-one margin, Democrats say Sotomayor should be confirmed, and by a similar margin Republicans hold the opposite view. Fifty-five percent (55%) of those not affiliated with either major party oppose her confirmation.
Eighty-three percent (83%) also say the U.S. legal system should apply the law equally to all Americans rather than using the law to help those who have less power and influence.

Interesting times indeed.
Hat Tip: HotAir

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    RA,

    FO&D.

  • SigFan

    I have no doubt that she will be confirmed. The question of if she should be though is a totally different animal. Given her very public statements and support for various identity-politics groups, IMO she is unfit to hold the seat she currently occupies, let alone on SCOTUS. Of course the fact that the majority of the people are not in favor of her confirmation won’t have any impact on Congress though, because it’s not like they were elected to represent us or anything.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Best of luck to ya, flatearthers.

    Strange that Sparkless would greet fellow graduates of the Vermont public school system after his nonsensical rant about SAB?

  • Mark

    Except that nobody gives a rat’s ass what republicans think.

    You do, DINO, or you wouldn’t be posting here.

    The Dems could nominate Bill Ayers and you would be in favor of it.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Heh!

    sparkless-pig-fuckin-buckle the “pandering ninny” and apoligist for racists is jealous! But wait, it’s worse than he thinks, because I’ve had two posts promoted to the front page so far. Sparkless? Not so much.

    Stand back folks, you don’t want to be too close when his head assplodes…

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    Supreme Court nominees don’t get elected.

    First time I agree with DINO. What’s more, it’s unfortunate that it takes someone like DINO, probably accidentally, to raise the point that this political circusing will lead to greater and greater partisan decision-making in our Court in the future.

    She was nominated. The senate wants to confirm her. Let it go.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Heh!

    Funny is watching a leftard troll’s head assplode!

    Funny is then seeing them type this:

    just so that you can begin to have a shred of a glimmer of an inkling what actual people out in the actual world thing[sic] funny is.

    A Vermont public Education, free!

    An undergraduate degree, ~ $100,000.00

    A postgraduate degree, ~ $200,000.00

    Watching the soi dissant intellectual’s head assplode: Priceless!

  • robert108

    Actually, whether she is appointed is up to a vote in the Senate, after a vote of the committee. It’s an election, just not an election where all the American people get a vote; only the ruling elite.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    SigFan,

    Indeed. The Congress in general, and the Senate in particular, have become too insulated from the People.

  • LoadTheMule

    Actually, whether she is appointed is up to a vote in the Senate, after a vote of the committee. It’s an election, just not an election where all the American people get a vote; only the ruling elite.

    You have a better idea? Pray tell, share with us.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Heh!

    I warned y’all his head would assplode!

  • Neiman

    She was nominated. The senate wants to confirm her. Let it go.

    Gee, all this time I thought the Senate was charged with giving their “Advice and Consent” to presidential nominations. Further, I thought these Senators were elected to represent “the people” of the United States, not their partisan interests. Damn Constitution!

    Further, it is the role of the “opposition” party to make sure the people see every aspect of the lives of the people the President nominates that, the people then might express their views to their Senators, and the polls help to inform the Senate of their feelings on the matter!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Except that nobody gives a rat’s ass what republicans think.

    And yet, you contribute your rat’s ass on a daily basis! You’re a funny, little troll, Dino!

  • JMT

    HP, “She was nominated. The senate wants to confirm her. Let it go.”

    “The world is a dangerous place; not because of those who do evil, but because of the good men that do nothing.” (or SAY nothing)

    Now I’m not saying I think she is ‘evil’ BUT the concept is the same…

    My family, including me, are known for holding grudges & I will let that be shown come election time.

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    JMT and Neiman,

    Generally I am inclined to agree with you. And of course, the senate is charged with giving advice and consent. But as a practical matter, I think far more harm than good is done by bitching about the inevitable here.

    The current bitching will be used as an excuse in the future to subject every nominee to a political circus where only the most politician-like judges will ever get through the nomination process. In other words, we are creating a precedent where the kind of judges we get are going to be as dishonest and power-oriented as our elected politicians.

    It is my strong opinion that we should not create that kind of environment in our judiciary.

  • http://www.thedailyslant.com/ Hairy Polemic

    In other words: I am not questioning your right to object right now, I am questioning the wisdom of you choosing to exercise that right.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    rob lets da wiz onto the front page?

    Don’t worry, Spark! There’s no danger of you being there!

  • JMT

    HP: “…we are creating a precedent where the kind of judges we get are going to be as dishonest and power-oriented as our elected politicians.”

    I think we are already way past (even before this one) worrying about noms giving “politically safe” answers in a “circus” like setting.

    CYA is already the norm now for SCOTUS noms (& some other noms) & so is the circus.

    AND if we set a 21st century precedent that even noms that have made obviously racist comments (no matter from which race) like she has will “get a pass”…that is really dangerous.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Proof,

    He survived his head assplosion!

    I knew his head is not among his vital parts!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    what actual people out in the actual world thing[sic] funny is.

    I’ve noticed that Wankertized has an aversion to the “T” word (think), as well!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    LOL, Supreme Court nominees don’t get elected. Who cares what Rasmussen/FOX says?

    By a three-to-one margin, Democrats say Sotomayor should be confirmed, and by a similar margin Republicans hold the opposite view.

    Except that nobody gives a rat’s ass what republicans think.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    rob lets da wiz onto the front page?

    that’s almost as bad as when he turned the front page into an illiterate’s drive-up menu.

    what next, picture only posts? posts from Palin?

    dear lord.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Next it will be TOMTOM, your little racist mascot who you let break all the clearly stated rules of participation on this blog because you secretly love his racist screed.

    Have you not noticed that DA WIZ is an obsessive jerk? He repeatedly calls BOB a racist for something anyone with a fucking brain undrstands was cynical humor about the stupid racist blitherings of some old Texan wench. Da Wiz cannot leave it alone because he has been embarassed. Its like you and your cyber-stalking of Hannitizer. Can’t win with arguments or facts, resort to slander and cold-calling our friends.

    You tarts are so fucked politically that making your desperation so much more salient by being obsessive jerks only makes it that much more sad. Back to the drawing board. Start with some facts or some actual fundable policy because you guys couldn’t pay for the last slew of world-storming bullshit you put us through.

    Best of luck to ya, flatearthers.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Da Wiz Pee-body Flagtie:
    I don’t know if they offer comedy classes at the community center or not, but perhaps you should take some… or hit a comedy joint or maybe rent a funny movie sometime… just so that you can begin to have a shred of a glimmer of an inkling what actual people out in the actual world thing funny is.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development