Sotomayor Repudiates Her “Wise Latina” Comments

I’ve always felt that the best way to gauge what someone actually believes is to listen to them talk when they don’t think anyone is really listening. Or when they don’t think there will be any widespread scrutiny of their comments. Today, during her confirmation hearing, Sonia Sotomayor repudiated her now-infamous and oft-made “wise Latina” comment:

WASHINGTON (AP) – Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor vigorously defended herself Tuesday against charges that her speeches and rulings show racial bias, telling a Senate panel vetting her nomination that critics had misunderstood her record.
“I want to state upfront, unequivocally and without doubt: I do not believe that any racial, ethnic or gender group has an advantage in sound judging. I do believe that every person has an equal opportunity to be a good and wise judge, regardless of their background or life experiences,” Sotomayor declared.

That’s what she said when she knew her words would be intensely scrutinized. But let’s go back to what she said when she was under no such scrutiny:

I would hope that a wise Latina woman, with the richness of her experiences, would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.

If she doesn’t believe that any “racial, ethnic or gender group has an advantage in sounding judging” then why did she say that Latina women would more often than not reach a better conclusion than white men?
Personally, I think Sotomayor is lying in her confirmation hearings. I don’t think she meant what she said about her “wise Latina” comment during her confirmation hearing. I think she meant what she said when she made the “wise Latina” comment in prepared speeches six different times.
And it’s a blatantly racist comment.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array carrick

    Hannitized

    We are winning.

    What exactly are you winning? And at what cost?

    You still have to live in this country when you are done “winning”. You may want to think about that too.

  • bill-tb

    Color coded justice, just what the Supreme Court needs.

    I think that the cute wise ‘pug nosed’ Latina smile will get her through. Too back Sarah doesn’t have such stupid facial expressions.

  • carrick

    RBB:

    What’s the deal with fox not showing the dem questioning her, but instead shows their own idiots talking about her?

    Had any of your dem’s done anything other than engage in a sexual orgy with Sotomayor, perhaps they would have.

    I’m pretty sure that most of the dem questioning qualifies as porn under the FCC licensing agreement.

  • SigFan

    She meant what she said when she first said it. Her history of association with groups like La Raza are all the proof anyone with an ounce of common sense needs.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Were Senator Mccain the president today, Sotomayor would NOT be on her way to a seat on the high court.

    Do you want to bet whether or not McSame votes for the racist?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    So what? She’ll say what she has to, placate the vile subspecies we call republican Senator and then go on to serve as a far left liberal on the Supreme Court.

    The end justifies the means.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Mudcat,

    You have the perspective of the terminally anal-cranal inverted. Perhaps some day your head shall emerge from the south end of your alimentary canal, the excretia will fall from your eyes, and you will see the error of your ways.

    Good luck.

  • robert108

    She’ll say what she has to…

    Yes; she’s a leftie liar just like you, little dino.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    buzzardbreath you racist fuck,

    Not at all.

    My defense is that being a blatant racist yourself, you project that aberrant behavior onto everyone you see to make yourself feel less aberrant.

    I have no use for Sotomayor for the same reason I have no use for you: you are both racist, sexist, sacks of excrement.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    I was getting a haircut and they had CNN on, so I got to hear her and the CNN analysis. A seamless presentation. Whoever wrote her script did a fine job. Every i dotted and every t crossed. Smooth as an Obama reading when the teleprompter is feeling 100%

    Now stand by for American justice getting a bad haircut, the same kind she gave the white firefighters.

    She is JALLS (just another lying liberal swine)

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Oh my!

    The Chutzpah continues!

    eunuchized, himself an apologists for racists, cries:

    Surprise, surprise, Rob believes what he wants.

    The projection on this thread by the left is palpable today!

  • Buzz

    I’d like to see her questioned on her bases for decision and reasoning in Ricci.

    Why would that matter to a bigot like yourself? She is not white, in your eyes she is inferior. Nothing she could say would possiably change your mind about her.

    You have already admitted you don’t listen to what liberals have to say anyway, so I am guessing your post is merely a comment booster, a fain attempt to appear tolerant to the casual observer. YOU FAIL AGAIN.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Heh!

    buzzardbreath the grand kleagle of SAB racists (and a sexist to boot):

    I would never try to defend these sub-humans. I said earlier im [sic] no nigger loving liberal. They are animals, pure and simple. Stay out west… its not safe here. -Buzz

    “Sand niggers”

    “Porch monkey”

    “kike”

    “knee deep in shines”

    “less than stellar minority’s (sic)”

    The only good hood nigger, is a dead hood nigger.

    Let’s see who had the balls to get an army of 1.2M gooks pissed off.

    “towlhead” [sic]

    You don’t think I would actually listen to what that cunt had to say would you?

    More nigger shit.

    Accuses someone else of being a bigot!

    That’s Chutzpah writ large!

    I don’t give a damn about the gender or ethnicity of a nominee for the Supreme Court. I do care about keeping self confessed racists and sexists such as Sotomayor off the court.

  • Buzz

    So under your analogy, you are not a drunk because you don’t drink as much as THAT guy. My personal thoughts have nothing to do with the fact that you are a bigot. Pointing to me does not distract from you.

  • carrick

    So Bob, you want to see US Senators butt-licking Sotomayor?

    Nope, sorry pp. With Schumer, they didn’t go to him for quite a few minutes.

    I didn’t see Feingold so you may be right about his coverage.

    So of course all we have here is your subjective opinion of the coverage.

    Even if it turned out that Fox had more balanced coverage, you would be the last person on the Earth to admit it.

    I’m only saying this because it is true, not because I admire Fox News, which I don’t, and which I certainly don’t waste my life by watching it.

  • Hannitized

    Personally, I think Sotomayor is lying in her confirmation hearings. I don’t think she meant what she said about her “wise Latina” comment during her confirmation hearing. I think she meant what she said when she made the “wise Latina” comment in prepared speeches six different times.

    And it’s a blatantly racist comment.

    Surprise, surprise, Rob believes what he wants.

    And Bush lied about his drug use, but then again, it’s OK when Republicans lie…….in your mind?

    And well soon find out which lie it was Cheney was telling…..that you will excuse.

    Had you any principles, your opinion just might have legs, as it stands now, you are wobbly.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    I’d like to see her questioned on her bases for decision and reasoning in Ricci. It’s already been decided by the Supreme Court, and thus not subject to further litigation. Since there was no examination of the issues and the law in the summary decision, and since the issue is now a decided matter not subject to further review, let her explain herself before the committee and the nation now.

  • robert108

    Sotomayor is obviously lying, and little H desperately tries to change the subject. Pathetic leftie denial.
    As little dino pointed out, one Justice makes a big difference, which is why her racist beliefs, and her willingness to lie about them, are vitally important.

  • sayanything-5371

    If Sotomayor were truly a “wise latina” she would not have made the idiotic taped remarks that she did. Ergo, she is not fit to be on SCOTUS, and therefor will be on SCOTUS. Once she is on SCOTUS it will shortly be confirmed that she indeed did mean what she said and that she perjured herself in order to get on SCOTUS. God save the USA from liberal fascism.

  • Hannitized

    If she truly meant what she had said, it would reveal itself in the coutroom, but she has voted against minority cases many times, based on the law.

    Her actions speak louder than her hyperbole, and you know it.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Interestingly, Senator Schumer is – at this moment – going through case after case where Judge Sotomayor voted against the interest of people of color ,

    I’m sure you’d be equally impressed by some Klan guy who told you that he once told a white kid he couldn’t date his daughter either.

    She isn’t being appointed to the minor leagues here. It’s a lifetime appointment and people that don’t get justice in her court can’t go anywhere else.

  • Hannitized

    I think she was revving up some attitude just as Palin does.

    I don’t believe she is lying, I believe she was being in your face. Lord knows some of you deserve it.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Oh my!

    We really need a better class of troll, this is just too easy!

    If she truly meant what she had said, it would reveal itself in the coutroom, but she has voted against minority cases many times, based on the law.

    Yeah, just like she did in Ricci without even providing here reasons…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Even given the often-noted collegiality of the Second Circuit, Judge Sotomayor has been in agreement with her colleagues more often than most – 94% of her constitutional decisions have been unanimous.

    She has voted with the majority in 98.2% of constitutional cases.

    When she has voted to hold a challenged governmental action unconstitutional, her decisions have been unanimous over 90% of the time.

    Republican appointees have agreed with her decision to hold a challenged governmental action unconstitutional in nearly 90% of cases.

    When she has voted to overrule a lower court or agency, her decisions have been unanimous over 93% of the time.

    Republican appointees have agreed with her decision to overrule a lower court decision in over 94% of cases.

    She overruled lower court and agency decisions at a rate that closely conforms to the circuit overall average.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • mudcat

    Rodney..the defender of racism..defending Sotomexican is liken to defending jack the ripper.

  • JMT

    I recognize “CYA” when I see/hear it & this is a classic example.

  • Bat One

    We really need a better class of troll…

    Far and away the most profound comment this year!!!

  • Hannitized

    Nothing of substance from either Bat or Da Wiz. Only ad hominem.

    We are winning.

  • Bat One

    I’m especially amused by Hannitized allusion to “substance.”

    Its kinda like the 3rd grader who hears the word “shit” on the school bus and decides to go home and try it out on the adults.

  • Hannitized

    Which, more often than not, Hannitized, appears to be your mode of civil discourse… WIN at any cost.

    Meh, that is just your opinion at the moment.

    I meant we are winning the battle of ideas and of making sound arguments in lieu of ad hominem.

    My inbox reveals the effort to elevate the debate. Don’t get too hung up on a comment here and there PP.

    Remember, I was the guy that agreed with Rob that the media should have covered what ended up being a bogus story, and while Rob was punked, he refuses to update his post.

    He claimed to care about the POTUS and our country, yet he PROMOTES the propaganda.

    Win at any cost? Look in the mirror.

  • pparets

    We are winning.

    Which, more often than not, Hannitized, appears to be your mode of civil discourse… WIN at any cost.

  • Spartacus

    mudcat = moby =
    An insidious and specialized type of left-wing troll who visits blogs and impersonates a conservative for the purpose of either spreading false rumors intended to sow dissension among conservative voters, or who purposely posts inflammatory and offensive comments for the purpose of discrediting the blog in question.

    The term is derived from the name of the liberal musician Moby, who famously suggested in February of 2004 that left-wing activists engage in this type of subterfuge: “For example, you can go on all the pro-life chat rooms and say you’re an outraged right-wing voter and that you know that George Bush drove an ex-girlfriend to an abortion clinic and paid for her to get an abortion. Then you go to an anti-immigration Web site chat room and ask, ‘What’s all this about George Bush proposing amnesty for illegal aliens?’”

    The strategy has been frequently attempted on conservative blogs, but has not been nearly as effective as Moby envisioned, since false rumors are easily debunked by fact-checking minions, and cartoonishly extreme commenters often get immediately identified as mobys and banned.
    “While I agree that it is vital to monitor incoming international phone calls from terrorists, President Bush has gone too far.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    pparets,

    Our eunuchized puts me more forcefully in mind of the “Black Knight”: “It’s just a flesh wound!”

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    She’s a racist. Her whole record shows that to be the case.

  • pparets

    Interestingly, Senator Schumer is – at this moment – going through case after case where Judge Sotomayor voted against the interest of people of color , in spite of her sympathy for them. Good stuff.

    In answer to one query, Sotomayor just said, “hate speech is protected by the consitution.” While on the 2nd Circuit, She had voted against the firing on a white NYC fire-fighter for distributing printed hate speech.

  • Hannitized

    Back up your statement with facts Whistler.

    You have been challenged.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    What’s the deal with fox not showing the dem questioning her, but instead shows their own idiots talking about her?

    Gee, I thought they were fair and balanced.

    Who Knew?

  • pparets

    RBB…. that’s just not true. They have given full coverage to Schumer and Russ feingold.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    C, thank you for confirming what most normal Americans already know, that fox is in no way fair and actually quite unbalanced.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    “Wise Latina.”

  • pparets

    You have a conveniently short memory, Whistler.

    I’m sure you’d be equally impressed by some Klan guy who told you that he once told a white kid he couldn’t date his daughter either.

    I’m the one who said that the Supreme Court was at stake all during the presidential election!

    Were Senator Mccain the president today, Sotomayor would NOT be on her way to a seat on the high court.

    Spare me your asinine little digs.

  • Spartacus

    C, thank you for confirming what most normal Americans already know, that fox is in no way fair and actually quite unbalanced.

    Apparently you still believe in the tooth fairy and have you’re own definition of “normal” that does not adhere to a Websters definition.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Nope, sorry pp. With Schumer, they didn’t go to him for quite a few minutes.

    I didn’t see Feingold so you may be right about his coverage.

  • pparets

    Whaddya think, Whistler… true or false?

    Were Senator Mccain the president today, Sotomayor would NOT be on her way to a seat on the high court.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    not showing Schumer do his stchick? that’s an act of mercy

    I was gonna watch it all but decided to observe the cracks forming in my driveway instead.

  • Neiman

    This hearings, especially on television, but really even in the Senate are a big waste of time, tax money and effort. She will be confirmed, the Democrats long before the hearings even started and without knowing one thing about her all pledged to vote for her confirmation. A few RINO’s and several more gutless Republicans will confirm her as well, it will be by a huge margin. This is all play acting for the cameras at our expense and the joke is on us, played o us by Mahdi Obama.

    This woman is a racist and sexist and all her pretense and that of the Democrats and the White House will never change that simple, absolute fact.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    He gets that from me.

    Years ago a very good friend of mine was his assistant press sectary. When I would go out there to see her, I’d alway end up in his office and we’d have a nice chat.

    Since then there are times when he has strayed from the path I set out for him. But over all, I’d say I’m 67% pleased with what he has done with all I taught him.

  • Spartacus

    If Sotomayor is confirmed, will they install urinals in the ladies restrooms or will they go coed?

  • pparets

    Well, they skipped his opening remarks… both sides being pretty predictable by now… “You helped the Framers write the Constitution, Didn’t you?” or “When did you discover that you are a spawn of satan?”.

    But, as soon as he began his interaction with Judge Sotomayor, they covered it all. His presentation, by the way, was brilliant!

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    barb, are you talkin’ about FOX NEWS, which dominates every cable time slot and draws more viewers than all other cable news combined?

    try to get out more…see the sun, walk on real grass…you sad lil’ monitor mouse.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Again C, thank you for confirming what normal Americans know about fox news.

  • Spartacus

    So Bob, you want to see US Senators butt-licking Sotomayor?

    Carrick, what the dems & RBB do isn’t licking, I believe the proper term is frenching.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    barb, are you talkin’ about FOX NEWS, which dominates every cable time slot and draws more viewers than all other cable news combined?

    Yet the Dumbocrats call it biased because no one listens to their irrelevant news anymore.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Whaddya think, Whistler… true or false?

    Obviously false, picking court nominees was probably one of the things that least scared me about McSame.

    Too bad he all but handed the election to Barri.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Obviously false, picking court nominees was probably one of the things that least scared me about McSame.

    Too bad he all but handed the election to Barri.

    I am not sure McCain’s picks would have been much better.
    I hope next time our party picks a decent candidate and doesn’t let the moderates and media pick them for us.

  • Mickey

    If she was a “Wise Latina” she would get a make over.

    That woman is a Plain Jane. She needs new clothing also.

    I mean come on, she is a national figure in the mother of all interviews…”congress”. At least dress for success and get a hair job. Spend some change. Lefty’s and media are easy to fool. Be a rock star, it worked for Barry. Style sells. This is the left for God sake. PUT ON A SHOW.

    Sell it, and they will come.

  • Hannitized

    How about this woman Carrick?

  • JMT

    Heck, McAmnesty (err, McCain) might even have PICKED HER TOO given that she is a member of the racist pro-amnesty for INVADERS group LaRaza.

    BTW, do NOT forget that Schumer is among the pro-amnesty for INVADERS crowd.

  • WOOFX

    It’s just Kabuki, though the Repugs will manage to lose more minority voters.
    As Vince says:
    White cheese, yellow cheese, comes with a twister.
    Tacos, fettuccine, linguine, martini, bikini. Justice Sotomayor

    Vince Slap Chop

  • sayanything-2483

    Surprise, surprise, Rob believes what he wants.
    Hannitized on July 14, 2009 at 09:28 am

    Even your head psychopath knows she’s lying.

    So what? She’ll say what she has to, placate the vile subspecies we call republican Senator and then go on to serve as a far left liberal on the Supreme Court.
    The end justifies the means.
    DINO on July 14, 2009 at 08:02 am

    Surfs up Gidget!

  • sayanything-2483

    Just curious…how many times have her decisions been over turned, and why?

  • sayanything-2483

    Not that I doubt you, but can you please provide a source for that information.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development