Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Since When Did We Become Afraid Of A Little Competition?

Zachary Karabell, writing in the Wall Street Journal:

The recent outcry over poisonous pet food and the recall of lead-tainted toys sourced by Mattel in China proves one thing: We have a China problem. It is not, however, a China problem in the way most people think. It is not a problem with safety standards that threaten our children and our pets. It is a problem with the very fact of China as an emerging force on the global economic stage, and it underscores a profound and worrying trend in American political and economic life. For half a century we fought for the creation of a global capitalist system. Now that we have one, we seem to have forgotten one little thing: Capitalism means competition, and we are acting like we can’t handle it.

I hear so many people complain about China and our trade with that nation, but what so few realize is just how good that trade is both for our country and for China.

For us, we get a ready supply of cheaply-manufactured goods that save us money without forcing Americans to work in the low-pay (by our standards) factories that make them.  For China, they get a huge market for their manufactured goods, which in turns provides good-paying factory jobs (by their standards) to people who would otherwise be trying to grow enough food to eat by subsistence farming.

I’ll grant that China’s social and political climate is atrocious.  The nation is a communist dictatorship and fiercely oppresses it’s people.  But then, the oppression isn’t as bad as it once was and a big reason for that is trade with America.  Which is also a big reason why China isn’t a military threat (aside from the reality of their exaggerated global military power) to us either.  If China attacks us they lose the market their economy depends on.

We should embrace trade with China, and also embrace the competition that nation’s businesses represent for American businesses.  America clawed it’s way to the top of the world’s economic pyramid through a free market that allowed our best and brightest to invent, innovate and generally engage in commerce with as little intervention from the government as possible.  But every time we pass a protectionist policy that impedes international trade, and every time we pass a new tax or burdensome regulation on business, we hurt our ability to stay on top of that pyramid.

Comments

I’m not sure that eliminating dangerous and hazardous products interferes with competition.  In fact, requiring standards actually improves competition, if only by not killing customers.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on September 5, 2007 at 08:05 am

But then, the oppression isn’t as bad as it once was and a big reason for that is trade with America.

I don’t think either of those statements is true, Rob.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on September 5, 2007 at 08:07 am

China currently produces in excess of 80% of toys sold worldwide. (a little competition?)

The latest fiasco with Mattel looks like this:

22 million toys recalled at $2 each = $44 million (if Chinese manufacturers agree to buy back the toys. Otherwise the loss will be a lot higher)

Loss to investors as a result of recall announcements and stock price drop at $.68 per share with 441 million shares issued = $300 million

50,000 man hours spent over the last 2 weeks for additional inspections = $1.5 million.

Do you think that Chinese manufacturers even begin to have the money to cover these losses?

I’m sure that Mattel is encouraging more companies to get their products from China.

ews48 on September 5, 2007 at 08:58 am

I’m sure that Mattel is encouraging more companies to get their products from China.

Why?


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on September 5, 2007 at 09:04 am
Avatar for Robert Perry

I also don’t know how much things are improving on the human rights scene; certainly the right to keep property is better, but the right to use it as one desires--say for one’s children, or for religious purposes--just ain’t there.

My take; let things in, but charge a revenue tariff to cover inspection fees and the cost of ports/Navy/coast guard we need to keep sea lanes free. 

And no, that’s not protectionism in the classical sense.  It’s simply a note that it costs us a certain amount to keep trade flowing freely, and we’re going to assess a tax to cover that cost.

(from Bastiat)

Robert Perry on September 5, 2007 at 12:46 pm

Is China a Communist dictatorship anymore?  They may mouth the words, but they seem to have slid more into a bureaucratic oligarchy of late.


The Universe Doesn’t Care If You’re Having Fun - Larry Niven

Never Waste Calories. - Fuzzy Pink

Random Numbers on September 5, 2007 at 01:36 pm

Remember about 15 years ago, all the “Buy American” bumper stickers and propaganda that was prevalent?

It was all correct—just about 15 years too late coming.

If we’re not there already, America will NOT be able to fight a large-scale war unless the Chinese (yes, they’re still red, but faking green) are on board.

Think that one over…


[Feet make good soup!]

Marty on September 5, 2007 at 08:47 pm
Avatar for Anh

Anything that is good for China, is bad for the America and the world.  China is a cancer that keep on coming back.  It is time for a radical chemotherapy.  We don’t need a stable China to trade with the people inhabiting it terroritories. We sure as hell do not need to concentrate industrial know how, and infrastruction in the only country that is actively pursueing policies to undermine our interest around the world.  Trade with China, just remember that we have to kill alot of Chinese on day or they will kill us.

Anh on September 6, 2007 at 07:28 am
Avatar for Corina Savin

In Romania (Central Europe) tooth paste and clothing from China was declared as dangerous because of some bacteria on them. All this stuff was retracted from the market and now people training to work for the protection of the consumer are obliged to take a class called Forex Trading Education so that they can label the bad merchandise on spot.

Corina Savin on December 20, 2007 at 10:55 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.