Shocker: The UAW Is Now The Majority Stockholder In Chrysler

Say you’re a labor union. Your big, bloated labor contracts are killing your industry to the point where its teetering on the edge of insolvency. What do you do? Negotiate more reasonable contracts?
Of course not. Get the Democrats you just got elected to take over the company for you and then give it to you.

STERLING HEIGHTS, Mich. — The United Auto Workers union will own 55% of a restructured Chrysler LLC and its retiree health care trust will get a seat on the board if union members vote to approve contract concessions this week.
Chrysler stock could even be traded publicly again, as there are mechanisms for the UAW to sell shares to fund the health care trust.

So that’s why the Obama administration couldn’t just let the automakers go bankrupt. That’s why the federal government had to step in to help guide companies like Chrysler and GM into extra-special government-run bankruptcy.
So that the unions could come out on top in all this.
And it’s not a conflict of interest at all that the unions are now not only controlling the labor at Chrysler, but the management too given their majority stake in the company.
Move along. Nothing to see here.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    “Workers Control the Means of Production.”

    Where have I heard that before.

    It seems to me that management negotiated away all value of the business to the unions. Really the stockholders should have no expectation of getting anything out of the company. The remaining ones should get what they can get out of it.

    As Sweet said, it’s time for the unions to put up or shut up. They own the company and the failure rests on them.

    Pfeh said:

    I hope Ford is taking note – if they handle themselves correctly, they will absolutely dominate GM and Chrysler in the coming years.

    Absolute domination. Who wants to bet that the Ford workers are better off than the GM/Chrysler workers?

  • sayanything-4625

    GM has just become a money pit, just like AMTRACK! God help us all!

  • http://pocketjacksblog.blogspot.com/ Jay W.

    jimmypop said:

    they can move EVERYTHING BACK to the usa in a year or so and build the cheapest, best cars in the world. frankly, i hope it works.

    Me too, I really do. But for that to happen the union’s primary focus will have to be growing the company which means increasing profit and cutting costs. In other words, they’ll have to be businesspeople.

    They have shown no inclination towards Chrysler in the past to work with the company to grow the business and increase profits for all to benefit (workers as well as shareholders). Their focus has been getting union employment as high as possible and to get as big a cut of the pie for the blue collar workers be darned.

    Understand, I agree with this; that’s the union’s job generally. I don’t get the suicide mentality of the union, the ‘we’d rather the company go bankrupt than give up the fight’, but that’s a matter of degree.

    The problem is that for a company to grow, the shareholders have to be satisfied. Long term it may be that Chrysler will be totally worker-owned. If that happens, will the management let the workers form a union to represent their interests? After all, the old union will now be management and it wouldn’t be fair to expect the workers to just trust management to look out for them, right?

  • docdave

    Chrysler is doomed. Unions don’t have the professional business knowledge to run a company

    My guess is that they are depending on government subsidies to keep them afloat, and with Obama in power they will probably get them.

    As a taxpayer providing the bailout money, I demand ownership in the bailout corporations too.

  • deadrody

    they can move EVERYTHING BACK to the usa in a year or so and build the cheapest, best cars in the world

    Are you joking ? You really think making every single part, nut, bolt, rivet, and supply material American made will do anything but DOUBLE the cost of a Chrysler vehicle ?

    And the idea that the very people that are to blame for the current quality of their vehicles are going IMPROVE it ? Let alone the impact on the management side of the company as the A-holes in the UAW exert control on the company. Sorry, but this move will only seal the fate of Chrysler

    Which is to say nothing of the fact that there has been no deal whatsoever with the banks that hold the $7 Billion in Chrysler debt.

  • Bodhi

    win win for the union hacks.

    lose lose for the stock holder and the tax payer.

  • http://www.bismarckmandanblog.com/ clintf

    Hopefully the UAW dies along with the car companies it runs into the ground. They were killing these companies already, now they’ll just be able to finish the job.

  • Mark

    And GM is going to be owned primarily by the govt and the unions.

    I will not buy a car from the government or the UAW.

    If Ford ends up this way too, guess I will have to buy foreign for the first time in my life.

  • http://pocketjacksblog.blogspot.com/ Jay W.

    The upside is that either the new union overlords will either start running the company more efficiently, cutting costs and labor where necessary, reducing hours and benefits or the company will continue its spiral towards bankruptcy.

    In other words, they’ll either turn into the very thing they’ve been fighting or they’ll perish.

    Most likely, the union leaders will eat up as much value as they can and leave the workers jobless.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Now they will have no one to blame except themselves. They will have to stop playing the child and behave as adults now.

  • Pfeh

    Maybe this will get the unions to start being something closer to even handed and dare I hope honest.

    Unions as they exist today have one goal – artificial inflation of the cost of labor by obtaining a local monopoly. They’re not about competitive advantage. They’re not altruistic or given to “honest” tendencies.

    I hope Ford is taking note – if they handle themselves correctly, they will absolutely dominate GM and Chrysler in the coming years.

    Also – with a Democrat controlled government, I don’t think GM or Chrysler will ever be allowed to fail. They will continue to get bailout after bailout (and possibly a few favorable laws) until the citizens of the USA, finally enraged by the flagrant abuse they’ll suffer for the sake of the unions, will vote a sea change in Congress.

  • SigFan

    If Ford ends up this way too, guess I will have to buy foreign for the first time in my life.

    At least for now, Ford is immune since they didn’t take any loans or bailout money. I wonder how the anti-monopoly laws would apply though if the Unions through Chrysler and GM manage to squeeze Ford out? FWIW – There are no 100% USA made cars anymore, and most of the foreign companies do final assembly at a minimum here. Hard to buy American, harder still not to buy foreign.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Here is another step towards Marxism and there will be no way to stop it. Until the next election.

  • Pfeh

    If we allow more taxpayer money to go to these crooks shame on us. And you might have to if Chrysler becomes the Lada of the USA. And if that happens, we are all so screwed!

    I’m anxiously awaiting the 2010 election cycle, hopefully congress can swing back to the right with some politicians who actually practice fiscal responsibility.

    In the meantime, expect to regularly see bailout money handed out to Chrysler and GM. Government loans which are then quietly “forgiven”, anyone?

  • HG

    Shocker: The UAW Is Now The Majority Stockholder In Chrysler

    Union thugs take over ownership of the very corps. they demonize and now they pay the salaries they confiscate a portion of? This ought to be fun.

  • Pfeh

    That’s a luxury they have as external adversary to an opponent more a matter of their created image. They put out the idea that the management has massive money they unfairly aren’t sharing, that there’s hidden profits, that there’s more than enough money to give better benefits… Now they will see right up front the difference between creating a false image for sociopolitical purposes and actually walking the walk of “if only I was in charge”.

    If I read you right, I think we’re in total agreement. It should be entertaining to watch as the marketing image the UAW has crafted for itself is torn aside by reality. Once management (the Union) has to bargin with labor (also the Union) for cost control on the company – comedy gold.

    We’ll need the laughter, since we can expect Barry-O and Congress to step in every so often with more taxpayer money.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    In no way the taxpayers should pay anymore to support these guys.

    I’m not buying their cars either.

  • http://northerngleaner.blogspot.com/ Gene

    I believe the union thugs should triple their salary and double benefits and salaries for everyone on the Chrysler payroll. I mean, let’s run this without any common sense. That will be normal for these doofuses

    I will never buy a union made car again. Toyota anyone??

  • HG

    Kinda gives new meaning to the ‘company store’, eh?

  • http://www.igormarxo.org/ Igor marxomarxovich

    Old Russian saying…You can tell same lie 1000 times but not change truth!

    Difference between USSR Communist media and USA “mainstream media”

    In Russia government make media say what they want – even if lie.
    In USA “mainstream media” try make government what they want – even if lie..
    …..eventually they become same thing?!

    I Igor produce Obama Birth Certificate at http://www.igormarxo.org

  • SigFan

    In no way the taxpayers should pay anymore to support these guys.
    I’m not buying their cars either.

    If we allow more taxpayer money to go to these crooks shame on us. And you might have to if Chrysler becomes the Lada of the USA. And if that happens, we are all so screwed!

  • studakota

    You see this is transparency, sort of. Instead of shoveling money through the back door, by giving it to Chrysler,to give to It’s Unions, we now give it, directly,to those fat assed workers I see on the production line.

  • Oswaldo

    Chrysler is doomed. Unions don’t have the professional business knowledge to run a company

    You mean to “ruin” a company, like their predecessors.

  • Pfeh

    At this point, it doesn’t matter what they do – I’ve boycotted Chrysler for life. Quite a few people have made the same decision.

    Doesn’t matter what they build now, if no one’s buying.

  • Mickey

    Chrysler is doomed. Unions don’t have the professional business knowledge to run a company. Oh well, Chrysler vehicles sucked anyway.

  • sayanything-2407

    Rob:

    If I were a union member, I’d be ticked right now. Suddenly my representatives in negotiating with my employer are now my employers?

    Conflict of interest?

    I was just thinking of that when I read the post.

    What are they going to do, negotiate with themselves for a raise?

  • SigFan

    GM is next – heard a couple of reports saying that the government and the union would become the majority stockholders in them under their restructuring plans. In GM’s case though I think there is a provision for the government to get common stock in exchange for “loans”. Which just makes us all stockholders in GM now, whether we would want to be or not. In fairness, I also heard that Obama hasn’t accepted the plan yet so it’s not a done deal, but given the news here with Chrysler I can’t imagine it’s far off.

    I wonder if this makes the union folks at Chrysler self-employed now – you know, subject to the double payroll taxes that independent business owners pay!

  • SigFan

    What are they going to do, negotiate with themselves for a raise?

    Why not, their role models in Congress do it all the time.

  • http://www.eaweb.ch/ mediaplazza

    Move along. Nothing to see here.

    That’s so true… quite nice finish

  • jimmypop

    I was just thinking of that when I read the post.

    What are they going to do, negotiate with themselves for a raise?

    yes. and they will move all their plants back to detroit. wouldnt they have to?

    best part about all of this; the lazy union workers now have nobody to blame for their failure.

  • jimmypop

    sure this is bad, but only for the share holders (and yes, we tax payers, but these guys were not going under no matter what).

    anyway, this is their chance to show the world how its done. they have a union owned and union run corporation that builds cars. they can move EVERYTHING BACK to the usa in a year or so and build the cheapest, best cars in the world. frankly, i hope it works. it would be great. yes, im being serious. and no, there is not a chance in the world its going to work, but it will be great fodder for any conservative when they fail to do what they wanted everyone else to do (bring every job back to the usa, pay the line people more than anyone, have bigger benefit packages, blah, blah, blah)

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    You mean to “ruin” a company…

    No, they’ve already done that!

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Pfeh:

    Unions as they exist today have one goal – artificial inflation of the cost of labor by obtaining a local monopoly. They’re not about competitive advantage. They’re not altruistic or given to “honest” tendencies.

    That’s a luxury they have as external adversary to an opponent more a matter of their created image. They put out the idea that the management has massive money they unfairly aren’t sharing, that there’s hidden profits, that there’s more than enough money to give better benefits… Now they will see right up front the difference between creating a false image for sociopolitical purposes and actually walking the walk of “if only I was in charge”.

    This has the added benefit of dragging the union leadership and rank and file apart. They will have to come clean and the rank and file aren’t going to like it. The truth is there’s no free ponies and ice cream. No new car keys under the chair. They’ve been paid way more than the business should if it wants to be profitable, prosperous and forward moving. They spent years construing fairness to mean a right to make as much as they demanded, and without the slightest nod to economic reality: the money is not there.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Now we get to see the unions put up or shut up. It’s about damn time and I am so very glad of this turn. It will be a learning experience for them and the spectators both who care to open themselves to it. Running a business leaves you with no wiggle room. You have control. Fail, and it is your fault.

    They will see that the amount of money given in executive compensation all added up and then distributed evenly across all the workers would be an amount were it offered during contract talks considered a pittance and unacceptable, tantamount to an insult. They imagine there’s some stockpile of money evil management is hiding. Now they are management and will see that there is no hoard to plunder.

    Maybe this will get the unions to start being something closer to even handed and dare I hope honest.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Most likely, the union leaders will eat up as much value as they can and leave the workers jobless.

    If I were a union member, I’d be ticked right now. Suddenly my representatives in negotiating with my employer are now my employers?

    Conflict of interest?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development