Shocker: Political Contributions From Journalists Favor Democrats Over Republicans 100 – 1

But don’t worry. They’re still completely objective in their reporting.

image

In related news, Time Magazine just dubbed Obama (with a straight face I’m sure) the “Next JFK.”

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array RebTex

    “.. Time Magazine just dubbed Obama … the “Next JFK.”
    .
    .
    ..
    They’d better hope he’s not!

  • JR Ewing

    With the online donations now it’s really impossible to get a 100% accurate number these days. However, the point is that many, many, more members of the media are liberal then are conservative. Combine that with journalists being allowed to present opinion as “news” these days and you get a heavily liberally biased media.

  • crshedd

    i went to the google to see if i could find your source (you should provide links) and found similar info at american thinker who links to huffington post.

    i have a hard time with these numbers.

    fox news contributed $0 to any republican.
    and msnbc is the real ‘fair and balanced’ organization, it gave equally (well, $72 more to republicans) to both sides.

    either the numbers are wrong or… i don’t know what.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Rob,

    I don’t know… There’s something to be said for those who put their money where their mouths are…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I don’t have a problem with their contributions. I just have a problem with all of them claiming that they’re objective.

    They’re not. That’s the problem.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development