Shocker: Obama’s “Stimulus” Bill Created A Bureaucracy That Exists To Ration Your Health Care

I’ve been banging this drum since before the stimulus was even law, but this issue can’t get too little attention.

Dr. Erik Novack is a health policy fellow with the Washington, DC-based group Americans for Prosperity (AFP). He believes healthcare plans being drawn up by the Obama administration will only serve to strengthen federal government involvement with vital healthcare decisions.
“[T]he so-called ‘stimulus bill’ — which was passed by Congress even though not a single member of Congress read the bill — …created a Comparative Effectiveness Research Board. This is a de facto rationing board,” Novack says.
The AFP spokesman explains the purview of that panel. “It is going to be given the authority not to compare whether…for example, one treatment versus another is better for a broken wrist, but it has been designed with the ability to determine…for the ‘public good’ [if] it is worthwhile treating somebody who is 80 [years old] who might get breast cancer versus somebody who is 60 [years old] with diabetes.”
According to Novack, an amendment was introduced that would have revoked the board’s ability to ration healthcare, but 54 Democrats voted against it.

Let’s keep in mind that Obama has already set the stage for this. Remember that a little-discussed part of Obama’s “stimulus” spending spree bill (which nobody in Congress actually read before voting it into law) created a new federal bureaucracy called the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology which reportedly will “monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective” with a goal to “reduce costs and ‘guide’ your doctor’s decisions.”
And just the other day Obama’s chief economic adviser was talking about all the money the Obama administration was going to save us on health care by stopping Americans from getting health care the government believes to be redundant or unnecessary. Now, maybe many Americans do get redundant and unnecessary health care, but what business is that of the government’s? Do we really want some bureaucrat making that decision for us?
Again, the end-game here is to have the government making your health care decisions for you. Based on some bureaucrat’s assessment of how many tax dollars they feel you’re worth.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://www.thechristianwoman.com/ Carrie

    It’s hard to believe Americans would ever accept this but I am afraid people have been duped into thinking this is somehow good. Lord help us.

  • SigFan

    If they manage to pull this off (and I still think at present that’s a BIG if), I wonder if they’ll publish the stories about the people who go off on the dimwits when they’re denied care for whatever the government deems to be a reason. I predict that there will be more than a few violent reactions to this.

    Of course, all our leftie friends who so desparately want this will just slink off to die when told to do so, because it’s for the good of all, right?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Earl Pomeroy said he read the bill.

    I didn’t know he could read.

  • Mark

    The amazing thing is SD’s own Tom Daschle thought this insane idea up.

    I’ve said it before, if you get old they want you to do the patriotic thing and die to save taxpayer’s money.

    This is a scary man, folks. We need to start hammering our congress people about this. And tell them we won’t stand for it.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development